Various reagent kits for comparatively analyzed effectiveness of humoral immune response after vaccination “Sputnik V"

S. P. Kazakov, D. Reshetnyak, N. Davydova, Оksana А. Efimushkina, S. Putkov
{"title":"Various reagent kits for comparatively analyzed effectiveness of humoral immune response after vaccination “Sputnik V\"","authors":"S. P. Kazakov, D. Reshetnyak, N. Davydova, Оksana А. Efimushkina, S. Putkov","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-vrk-1977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern methods of vaccination have confirmed their high effectiveness in fighting against the pandemic of a novel coronavirus infection. However, the use of various types of vaccines requires studying the effectiveness of the post-vaccination immune response (PIO), first of all, assessing the specificity and amount of production of antibodies to the surface and internal antigens of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in particular, after the use of the most promising domestic vaccine Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V). In particular, the data on the effectiveness of PVIR (increased antibody level) for the most promising domestic vaccine Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V) need to be confirmed. It is also necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the laboratory methods used for this purpose. To assess the effectiveness of PVIR, samples of biomaterial (blood serum) obtained on the 2225 day after inoculation of the second component of the vaccine from 202 Sputnik V-vaccinated, not preimmunized subjects, lacking antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination, were examined. The levels of IgG and IgM antibodies to the surface and nucleocapsid antigens of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were determined using several semi-quantitative and quantitative methods and reagent kits from national and foreign manufacturers. To assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the methods, a comparative analysis of the specificity and sensitivity of all the laboratory methods used and a data correlation for various quantitative methods (using the Spearman correlation coefficient) between antibodies specific to the full-sized trimerized S-protein and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein were carried out. During the study, it was determined that all the reagent kits used to study IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and S-protein RBD showed maximum (100%) specificity in in the majority subjects (from 186 to 202 samples). The relevance of the data (comparative specificity), both for semi-quantitative and quantitative ELISA as well as for both ILA test systems regarding qualitative characteristics (positivenegative) was also close to the maximum magnitude (98.499.4%). A post-vaccination immune response during Sputnik V vaccination analyzing production of specific IgG antibodies was observed in 98.9% of all vaccinated subjects. IgG antibody range was studied to assess related protective level. Data are presented that a protective level of more than 150 BAU/мл was observed in 59.390.5% of the subjects, above 500 BAU/мл in 22.052.4% of the subjects, depending on the method used and the set of reagents. Based on the data obtained, it is concluded that all the methods and kits of reagents used, including domestically manufactured semi-quantitative tests, can be considered adequate to assess effectiveness of the post-vaccination immune response analyzing production of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-vrk-1977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern methods of vaccination have confirmed their high effectiveness in fighting against the pandemic of a novel coronavirus infection. However, the use of various types of vaccines requires studying the effectiveness of the post-vaccination immune response (PIO), first of all, assessing the specificity and amount of production of antibodies to the surface and internal antigens of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in particular, after the use of the most promising domestic vaccine Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V). In particular, the data on the effectiveness of PVIR (increased antibody level) for the most promising domestic vaccine Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V) need to be confirmed. It is also necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the laboratory methods used for this purpose. To assess the effectiveness of PVIR, samples of biomaterial (blood serum) obtained on the 2225 day after inoculation of the second component of the vaccine from 202 Sputnik V-vaccinated, not preimmunized subjects, lacking antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination, were examined. The levels of IgG and IgM antibodies to the surface and nucleocapsid antigens of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were determined using several semi-quantitative and quantitative methods and reagent kits from national and foreign manufacturers. To assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the methods, a comparative analysis of the specificity and sensitivity of all the laboratory methods used and a data correlation for various quantitative methods (using the Spearman correlation coefficient) between antibodies specific to the full-sized trimerized S-protein and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein were carried out. During the study, it was determined that all the reagent kits used to study IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and S-protein RBD showed maximum (100%) specificity in in the majority subjects (from 186 to 202 samples). The relevance of the data (comparative specificity), both for semi-quantitative and quantitative ELISA as well as for both ILA test systems regarding qualitative characteristics (positivenegative) was also close to the maximum magnitude (98.499.4%). A post-vaccination immune response during Sputnik V vaccination analyzing production of specific IgG antibodies was observed in 98.9% of all vaccinated subjects. IgG antibody range was studied to assess related protective level. Data are presented that a protective level of more than 150 BAU/мл was observed in 59.390.5% of the subjects, above 500 BAU/мл in 22.052.4% of the subjects, depending on the method used and the set of reagents. Based on the data obtained, it is concluded that all the methods and kits of reagents used, including domestically manufactured semi-quantitative tests, can be considered adequate to assess effectiveness of the post-vaccination immune response analyzing production of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.
“斯普特尼克V”疫苗接种后体液免疫反应效果对比分析的各种试剂
现代疫苗接种方法在抗击新型冠状病毒感染大流行方面的有效性得到了证实。然而,使用各种类型的疫苗需要研究疫苗接种后免疫反应(PIO)的有效性,首先要评估SARS-CoV-2病毒表面和内部抗原抗体的特异性和产生量,特别是在使用最有前途的国产疫苗Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V)后,关于最有希望的国产疫苗Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V)的PVIR(提高抗体水平)有效性的数据需要得到确认。也有必要评估用于此目的的实验室方法的有效性。为了评估PVIR的有效性,对接种了Sputnik v疫苗的202名未预免疫、接种前缺乏SARS-CoV-2抗体的受试者在接种疫苗第二组分后2225天获得的生物材料(血清)进行了检测。采用半定量和定量方法及国内外生产企业的试剂盒检测SARS-CoV-2病毒表面抗原和核衣壳抗原IgG和IgM抗体水平。为了评估这些方法的诊断有效性,对所使用的所有实验室方法的特异性和敏感性进行了比较分析,并对针对全尺寸三聚s蛋白的抗体与SARS-CoV-2 s蛋白的受体结合结构域(RBD)的各种定量方法(使用Spearman相关系数)进行了数据相关性分析。在研究过程中,所有用于研究SARS-CoV-2 s蛋白和s蛋白RBD的IgG抗体的试剂盒在大多数受试者(186至202个样本)中都显示出最高(100%)的特异性。半定量和定量ELISA以及两种ILA检测系统在定性特征(阳性-阴性)方面的数据相关性(比较特异性)也接近最大值(98.499.4%)。在Sputnik V疫苗接种期间,分析特异性IgG抗体的产生,在所有接种者中观察到98.9%的接种后免疫应答。研究IgG抗体范围以评估相关保护水平。数据显示,根据使用的方法和试剂的不同,59.390.5%的受试者的防护水平大于150 BAU/мл, 22.052.4%的受试者的防护水平大于500 BAU/мл。根据获得的数据,我们认为所有使用的方法和试剂试剂盒,包括国内生产的半定量测试,都可以被认为足以评估疫苗接种后免疫反应分析sars - cov -2特异性抗体产生的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信