{"title":"An Analysis of the Debate Between al-Tūsī and al-Kātibī on Infinite Regress","authors":"Mehmet Tayfun Kucuk","doi":"10.5152/ilted.2022.2279191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents an analysis of the written debate between Najm al-Dīn al-K ā tibī and Nasīr al-Dīn al-Ṭ ūsī on the possi bilit y/imp ossib ility of infinite regress. This debate addressed three of the most famous arguments put forward by Islamic philosophers, regarding the impossibility of infinite regress in the classical period. These arguments are known as burh ā n al-arshi, burh ā n al-tatbīq, and burh ā n al-tazayuf in the classical Islamic thought. Al-K ā tibī wrote a letter to his teacher al-Ṭ ūsī to raise his objections against these arguments. In this letter, he first presented the arguments about the impossibility of infinite regress and then voiced his objections against them. However, al-Ṭ ūsī offered quite satisfactory and convincing answers to al-K ā tibī's objections. Convinced by his teacher’s explanations, al-K ā tibī accepted the validity of these arguments, which were offered in the classical period regarding the impossibility of infinite regress, and expressed this acceptance by writing a final letter of confession. The debate ended with the last letter that al-Ṭ ūsī wrote, in response to this confession, to express his gratitude and appreciation.","PeriodicalId":40262,"journal":{"name":"Ilahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi-Journal of Ilahiyat Researches","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi-Journal of Ilahiyat Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ilted.2022.2279191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents an analysis of the written debate between Najm al-Dīn al-K ā tibī and Nasīr al-Dīn al-Ṭ ūsī on the possi bilit y/imp ossib ility of infinite regress. This debate addressed three of the most famous arguments put forward by Islamic philosophers, regarding the impossibility of infinite regress in the classical period. These arguments are known as burh ā n al-arshi, burh ā n al-tatbīq, and burh ā n al-tazayuf in the classical Islamic thought. Al-K ā tibī wrote a letter to his teacher al-Ṭ ūsī to raise his objections against these arguments. In this letter, he first presented the arguments about the impossibility of infinite regress and then voiced his objections against them. However, al-Ṭ ūsī offered quite satisfactory and convincing answers to al-K ā tibī's objections. Convinced by his teacher’s explanations, al-K ā tibī accepted the validity of these arguments, which were offered in the classical period regarding the impossibility of infinite regress, and expressed this acceptance by writing a final letter of confession. The debate ended with the last letter that al-Ṭ ūsī wrote, in response to this confession, to express his gratitude and appreciation.
本研究分析了Najm al- d īn al- k ā tib_和nas r al- d īn al-Ṭ ūsī关于无限回归的可能性/可能性的书面辩论。这场辩论讨论了伊斯兰哲学家提出的三个最著名的论点,即古典时期无限倒退的不可能性。这些论点在古典伊斯兰思想中被称为burh ā n al-arshi, burh ā n al- tatb q和burh ā n al-tazayuf。al- k ā tib写了一封信给他的老师al-Ṭ ūsī,提出他对这些论点的反对意见。在这封信中,他首先提出了无限回归不可能的论点,然后表达了他的反对意见。然而,al-Ṭ ūsī对al- k ā tibir的反对意见提供了相当令人满意和令人信服的答案。被他老师的解释所说服,al-K ā tibji接受了这些论点的有效性,这些论点是在古典时期提出的,关于无限回归的不可能性,并通过写最后的忏悔信来表达这一接受。辩论以al-Ṭ ūsī为回应这一忏悔而写的最后一封信结束,这封信表达了他的感激之情。