Decision-Focused Optimization: Asking the Right Questions About Well-Spacing

Ryan A. Hassen, D. S. Fulford, Clayton T. Burrows, G. Starley
{"title":"Decision-Focused Optimization: Asking the Right Questions About Well-Spacing","authors":"Ryan A. Hassen, D. S. Fulford, Clayton T. Burrows, G. Starley","doi":"10.2118/191783-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Engineers and leaders who must decide on development strategies for unconventional resource projects face a challenging design problem. While we must make decisions on well and completion design, including well-spacing in three-dimensions, the complexity of the physical system and the interactions between these parameters can become overwhelming. The technical optimization problem can be difficult; however, asking the right questions can make the business decision clearer than it first appears.\n The typical approach to design optimization problems is to build models, with a tendency toward including an ever-increasing number of parameters to describe the system in exhaustive detail. However, our uncertainty in the model parameters often makes it impossible to identify the true optimum. In this work, we focus instead on reducing the number of model parameters and capturing the impact of these critical uncertainties on our business decisions. This allows us to answer the right questions in order to define and choose the best well-spacing strategy.\n For well-spacing optimization, a critical uncertainty is the relationship between the chosen well-spacing and the potential well-performance degradation, in terms of estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and initial production (IP). Rather than attempting to describe fracture geometry and well interference from a mechanistic standpoint, we introduce a lumped parameter, the shared reservoir (SR) factor, to account for this complex relationship. The parameter distribution may be calibrated to (a) well results in a play, (b) well results in carefully selected analogue plays, or (c) simulated well results from probabilistic analyses. An example of a Monte-Carlo simulation using the uncertainty of the SR factor, as well as the mean EUR and IP, highlights the utility of the method. We also illustrate how the spacing decision impacts key risk and financial metrics, including the expected monetary value of the project, the probability of regretting the decision, and the probability of commercial success of the project.\n The shared reservoir factor is proposed to capture the complex relationships between the well-spacing decision and the EUR and IP that result from this decision. Using the shared reservoir factor, we can develop simple stochastic models to clarify an otherwise frustratingly complex optimization problem.","PeriodicalId":11155,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191783-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Engineers and leaders who must decide on development strategies for unconventional resource projects face a challenging design problem. While we must make decisions on well and completion design, including well-spacing in three-dimensions, the complexity of the physical system and the interactions between these parameters can become overwhelming. The technical optimization problem can be difficult; however, asking the right questions can make the business decision clearer than it first appears. The typical approach to design optimization problems is to build models, with a tendency toward including an ever-increasing number of parameters to describe the system in exhaustive detail. However, our uncertainty in the model parameters often makes it impossible to identify the true optimum. In this work, we focus instead on reducing the number of model parameters and capturing the impact of these critical uncertainties on our business decisions. This allows us to answer the right questions in order to define and choose the best well-spacing strategy. For well-spacing optimization, a critical uncertainty is the relationship between the chosen well-spacing and the potential well-performance degradation, in terms of estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and initial production (IP). Rather than attempting to describe fracture geometry and well interference from a mechanistic standpoint, we introduce a lumped parameter, the shared reservoir (SR) factor, to account for this complex relationship. The parameter distribution may be calibrated to (a) well results in a play, (b) well results in carefully selected analogue plays, or (c) simulated well results from probabilistic analyses. An example of a Monte-Carlo simulation using the uncertainty of the SR factor, as well as the mean EUR and IP, highlights the utility of the method. We also illustrate how the spacing decision impacts key risk and financial metrics, including the expected monetary value of the project, the probability of regretting the decision, and the probability of commercial success of the project. The shared reservoir factor is proposed to capture the complex relationships between the well-spacing decision and the EUR and IP that result from this decision. Using the shared reservoir factor, we can develop simple stochastic models to clarify an otherwise frustratingly complex optimization problem.
以决策为中心的优化:提出正确的井距问题
工程师和领导者必须决定非常规资源项目的开发策略,他们面临着一个具有挑战性的设计问题。虽然我们必须对井和完井设计做出决策,包括三维井距,但物理系统的复杂性以及这些参数之间的相互作用可能会变得非常复杂。技术优化问题可能很困难;然而,提出正确的问题可以使商业决策比最初看起来更清晰。设计优化问题的典型方法是建立模型,倾向于包括越来越多的参数,以详尽地描述系统的细节。然而,模型参数的不确定性往往使我们无法确定真正的最优。在这项工作中,我们专注于减少模型参数的数量,并捕获这些关键不确定性对我们的业务决策的影响。这使我们能够回答正确的问题,从而定义和选择最佳的井距策略。对于井距优化,一个关键的不确定性是所选择的井距与潜在的井性能下降之间的关系,即估计的最终采收率(EUR)和初始产量(IP)。我们不是试图从力学的角度来描述裂缝的几何形状和井眼干扰,而是引入了一个集总参数,即共享油藏(SR)因素,来解释这种复杂的关系。参数分布可以校准为:(a)某一区块的井结果,(b)精心选择的模拟区块的井结果,或(c)概率分析的模拟井结果。一个蒙特卡罗模拟的例子使用SR因素的不确定性,以及平均EUR和IP,突出了该方法的实用性。我们还说明了间隔决策如何影响关键风险和财务指标,包括项目的预期货币价值、后悔决策的可能性以及项目商业成功的可能性。提出了共享储层因子,以捕捉井距决策与由此决定的EUR和IP之间的复杂关系。利用共享储层因子,我们可以建立简单的随机模型来澄清一个令人沮丧的复杂优化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信