Childhood trauma history of female sex offenders: A systematic review

IF 1.2 Q3 Medicine
E. Neofytou
{"title":"Childhood trauma history of female sex offenders: A systematic review","authors":"E. Neofytou","doi":"10.1016/j.sexol.2021.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This review examined the existing empirical literature on trauma histories of female sex offenders to investigate the effects of childhood sexual abuse along with other traumatic experiences that lead to developmental traumas.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>For this, validated questionnaire were used; we searched for articles in PsycInfo, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The inclusion criteria comprised studies that employed the Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire and the </span>Childhood Trauma Questionnaire<span> and that were published in English from 2007–2020. To direct this review, the articles’ selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews<span> guidelines. After reviewing 2039 abstracts, 78 met the criteria; after removing duplicates, 12 articles were assessed for eligibility. Eventually, four abstracts that used the validated questionnaires were considered admissible and their methods involved non-randomized convenience samples of sex offenders either in prison or in treatment programs.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistics on female sex offender prosecutions were relatively low compared to victim reports of sexual abuse committed by females. Compared with males, sexual abuse perpetrated by females had more damaging effects on the victims. The results indicated that childhood sexual abuse history was the most common type of maltreatment, along with physical abandonment, emotional abandonment, mental illness at home, and family instability due to divorced or unmarried parents, contributing to the development of sex offending behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Future research should address policies that allow for early intervention and treatments that target the understanding of maltreatment histories to ameliorate the child sexual abuse effects in life's early stages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45416,"journal":{"name":"Sexologies","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136021000864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

This review examined the existing empirical literature on trauma histories of female sex offenders to investigate the effects of childhood sexual abuse along with other traumatic experiences that lead to developmental traumas.

Material and methods

For this, validated questionnaire were used; we searched for articles in PsycInfo, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The inclusion criteria comprised studies that employed the Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and that were published in English from 2007–2020. To direct this review, the articles’ selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. After reviewing 2039 abstracts, 78 met the criteria; after removing duplicates, 12 articles were assessed for eligibility. Eventually, four abstracts that used the validated questionnaires were considered admissible and their methods involved non-randomized convenience samples of sex offenders either in prison or in treatment programs.

Results

Statistics on female sex offender prosecutions were relatively low compared to victim reports of sexual abuse committed by females. Compared with males, sexual abuse perpetrated by females had more damaging effects on the victims. The results indicated that childhood sexual abuse history was the most common type of maltreatment, along with physical abandonment, emotional abandonment, mental illness at home, and family instability due to divorced or unmarried parents, contributing to the development of sex offending behaviors.

Conclusion

Future research should address policies that allow for early intervention and treatments that target the understanding of maltreatment histories to ameliorate the child sexual abuse effects in life's early stages.

女性性犯罪者的童年创伤史:系统回顾
目的通过对女性性犯罪者创伤史的实证研究,探讨儿童期性侵及其他创伤经历对发育性创伤的影响。材料与方法本研究采用验证问卷;我们在PsycInfo, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE和EMBASE上搜索了文章。纳入标准包括采用不良童年经历问卷和童年创伤问卷的研究,并于2007-2020年以英文出版。为了指导这一综述,文章的选择遵循了系统综述指南的首选报告项目。在审查2039篇摘要后,78篇符合标准;在去除重复项后,对12篇文章进行了合格性评估。最终,四个使用有效问卷的摘要被认为是可接受的,他们的方法涉及监狱或治疗项目中的性犯罪者的非随机方便样本。结果与女性性侵犯受害者报告相比,女性性犯罪者起诉的统计数据相对较低。与男性相比,女性性虐待对受害者的破坏性影响更大。结果表明,儿童时期的性侵史是最常见的虐待类型,此外,身体遗弃、情感遗弃、家庭精神疾病以及父母离异或未婚导致的家庭不稳定是性侵犯行为发生的原因。结论:未来的研究应制定政策,允许早期干预和治疗,以了解虐待史为目标,改善生命早期阶段儿童性虐待的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexologies
Sexologies PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Sexologies offers a large panel of information to all health professionals working in the field of sexuality: anatomophysiological and basic research; psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioural and relational evaluations of sexual difficulties; epidemiological, sociological, forensic data; information on new sexoactive molecules; research on sexual physiology, reports on specialized congresses; press and books reviews; ethical aspects; calendar of major events of sexology around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信