Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Magill, Arturo Rodriguez
{"title":"Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity","authors":"K. Magill, Arturo Rodriguez","doi":"10.14288/CE.V12I1.186451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a critical case study, which proposes intellectual solidarity as a grounding framework for education. Our initial assumptions considered the following: first, what are those antagonisms limiting authentic human relationships and social transformation in schooling and society? Second, what are some of the dispositions, pedagogies, and experiences of teachers who identify as critical educators and endeavor to transform those antagonisms with students and community members? As we proceed, we describe what we understand to be the interconnected relationship between alienation, schooling, and socialization. Our claim is the relationship between intellectualism and solidarity might be understood as an important remedy to the harmful ideologies limiting personal freedoms and especially collective agency. We identify middle class neoliberal whiteness as the prevailing ideological construct limiting the type of work teachers might otherwise conduct. We further argue teachers might begin by adopting and embodying a critical ontological pedagogical posture to focus more transformational forms of learning. Finally, we acknowledge intellectual solidarity is not a series of practices, but rather an approach working toward informed collective agency.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V12I1.186451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper is a critical case study, which proposes intellectual solidarity as a grounding framework for education. Our initial assumptions considered the following: first, what are those antagonisms limiting authentic human relationships and social transformation in schooling and society? Second, what are some of the dispositions, pedagogies, and experiences of teachers who identify as critical educators and endeavor to transform those antagonisms with students and community members? As we proceed, we describe what we understand to be the interconnected relationship between alienation, schooling, and socialization. Our claim is the relationship between intellectualism and solidarity might be understood as an important remedy to the harmful ideologies limiting personal freedoms and especially collective agency. We identify middle class neoliberal whiteness as the prevailing ideological construct limiting the type of work teachers might otherwise conduct. We further argue teachers might begin by adopting and embodying a critical ontological pedagogical posture to focus more transformational forms of learning. Finally, we acknowledge intellectual solidarity is not a series of practices, but rather an approach working toward informed collective agency.
作为智力团结的教学
本文是一个重要的案例研究,它提出智力团结作为教育的基础框架。我们最初的假设考虑了以下几点:首先,在学校和社会中,哪些对抗限制了真正的人际关系和社会转型?第二,那些认为自己是批判性教育者并努力改变与学生和社区成员之间的对立的教师,他们的一些性格、教学法和经验是什么?接下来,我们将描述我们所理解的异化、学校教育和社会化之间的相互联系。我们的主张是理智主义和团结之间的关系可以被理解为对限制个人自由特别是集体能动性的有害意识形态的重要补救。我们认为中产阶级的新自由主义白人是一种主流的意识形态结构,限制了教师可能从事的工作类型。我们进一步认为,教师可能首先采取并体现一种批判的本体论教学姿态,以关注更多的转化形式的学习。最后,我们承认知识分子的团结不是一系列的实践,而是一种朝着知情的集体机构努力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信