Multiple anthropometric failures and early child development in 34 low- and middle-income countries

Joshua Jeong, Rockli Kim, S. Subramanian
{"title":"Multiple anthropometric failures and early child development in 34 low- and middle-income countries","authors":"Joshua Jeong, Rockli Kim, S. Subramanian","doi":"10.35500/jghs.2019.1.e42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Child stunting is negatively associated with early child development (ECD) outcomes. However, less is known regarding the associations between multiple co-occurring anthropometric failures and ECD. The objective of this study was to determine the association between categories of anthropometric failures (CAF)—disaggregating single, double, and triple failures—with ECD among children in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We combined data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys for 98,189 children aged 36–59 months in 34 LMICs. Height-for-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for-age were calculated using the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards. Children were classified into 7 mutually exclusive categories: no deficits; stunted only; wasted only; underweight only; stunted and underweight but not wasted; wasted and underweight but not stunted; and stunted, wasted, and underweight. ECD was measured using the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI), an index of cognitive, literacy-numeracy, socioemotional, and physical development milestones for preschool-aged children. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate the association between CAF and ECDI z-scores. Results: Overall, 20.4% of children had a single failure (17.9% stunted only, 1.0% wasted only, and 1.5% underweight only), 13.7% had double failures (12.0% stunted and underweight, 1.7% wasted and underweight), and 1.5% had triple failures. Compared to children with no deficits, children with a single failure of stunting only (β = −0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.10 to −0.07), double failure of stunting and underweight (β = −0.17; 95% CI, −0.19 to −0.15), and triple failure of stunting, wasting, and underweight (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.20 to −0.10) were associated with statistically significant lower ECDI z-scores. Conclusion: We found a potentially additive relationship between multiple anthropometric failures and ECD. Findings highlight the importance of integrated interventions that support mild to severe malnutrition as a key component of nurturing care approaches to improve ECD in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":93578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health science","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2019.1.e42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Child stunting is negatively associated with early child development (ECD) outcomes. However, less is known regarding the associations between multiple co-occurring anthropometric failures and ECD. The objective of this study was to determine the association between categories of anthropometric failures (CAF)—disaggregating single, double, and triple failures—with ECD among children in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We combined data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys for 98,189 children aged 36–59 months in 34 LMICs. Height-for-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for-age were calculated using the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards. Children were classified into 7 mutually exclusive categories: no deficits; stunted only; wasted only; underweight only; stunted and underweight but not wasted; wasted and underweight but not stunted; and stunted, wasted, and underweight. ECD was measured using the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI), an index of cognitive, literacy-numeracy, socioemotional, and physical development milestones for preschool-aged children. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate the association between CAF and ECDI z-scores. Results: Overall, 20.4% of children had a single failure (17.9% stunted only, 1.0% wasted only, and 1.5% underweight only), 13.7% had double failures (12.0% stunted and underweight, 1.7% wasted and underweight), and 1.5% had triple failures. Compared to children with no deficits, children with a single failure of stunting only (β = −0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.10 to −0.07), double failure of stunting and underweight (β = −0.17; 95% CI, −0.19 to −0.15), and triple failure of stunting, wasting, and underweight (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.20 to −0.10) were associated with statistically significant lower ECDI z-scores. Conclusion: We found a potentially additive relationship between multiple anthropometric failures and ECD. Findings highlight the importance of integrated interventions that support mild to severe malnutrition as a key component of nurturing care approaches to improve ECD in LMICs.
34个低收入和中等收入国家的多次人体测量失败与儿童早期发育
背景:儿童发育迟缓与儿童早期发展(ECD)结果呈负相关。然而,关于多重同时发生的人体测量失败与ECD之间的关系,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定在中低收入国家(LMICs)的儿童中,人体测量失败(CAF)类别(分解为单次、两次和三重失败)与ECD之间的关系。方法:我们综合了34个低收入国家98,189名36-59个月儿童的多指标聚类调查数据。身高年龄比、体重身高比和体重年龄比的计算采用了2006年世界卫生组织的生长标准。将儿童分为7个相互排斥的类别:无缺陷;发育不良;浪费;体重不足;发育迟缓和体重不足,但不消瘦;消瘦和体重不足,但不发育不良的;发育不良,消瘦,体重不足。儿童早期发展指数(ECDI)是衡量学龄前儿童认知、识字、计算、社会情感和身体发展里程碑的指标。我们使用多变量线性回归模型来估计CAF和ECDI z-评分之间的关联。结果:总体而言,20.4%的儿童出现单一失败(17.9%发育不良,1.0%消瘦,1.5%体重不足),13.7%出现双重失败(12.0%发育不良和体重不足,1.7%消瘦和体重不足),1.5%出现三重失败。与没有缺陷的儿童相比,单一失败的儿童仅发育迟缓(β = - 0.08;95%可信区间[CI],−0.10至−0.07),发育迟缓和体重不足的双重失败(β =−0.17;95% CI, - 0.19至- 0.15),以及发育迟缓、消瘦和体重不足的三重失败(β = - 0.15;95% CI(- 0.20 ~ - 0.10)与统计学上显著降低的ECDI z-score相关。结论:我们发现多次人体测量失败与ECD之间存在潜在的叠加关系。研究结果强调了支持轻度至重度营养不良的综合干预措施的重要性,将其作为改善中低收入国家儿童早期发展的培育护理方法的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信