Najwa Alfarra, Nouf Aldhawyan, Sammah Alharbi, Mohammed Sheeha
{"title":"Perception of Healthcare Providers in Agile Environment Imposed by the COVID-19","authors":"Najwa Alfarra, Nouf Aldhawyan, Sammah Alharbi, Mohammed Sheeha","doi":"10.31579/2693-4779/027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Nearly nine months have passed since the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the rapidly spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, unprecedented precautionary strict measures were applied to prevent virus entry to the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives. The physical rehabilitation is the 3rd largest profession in the area of healthcare and is the most representative profession in the area of rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. Physical rehabilitation services provide the development, maintenance, and recovery of people’s movement and functional ability, improving their quality of life. In this way, many hospitalized patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as chronic patients, need physical rehabilitation services. This study aimed to determine the number of therapists/ clinicians who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the therapists/clinicians to continue serving and supporting their patients. METHODS The sample comprised 46 therapists/clinicians who worked in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), 19 (41.4%) males and 27 (58.6%) females. The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire applied mid-July to mid-August 2020 through email. The questionnaires consisted of four primary sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service. RESULTS Out of the 46 therapists/clinicians, 37 (80.4%) interrupted their work activities because of the pandemic and 9 (19.6%) continue with the existing daily practice. The number of patients seen/day before pandemic decreased compare to pre pandemic by21.7%, in arrange of 15 patients/day to zero patient/day by 26.1%, that led to change the way of therapists daily practice such as seven therapists shifted their clinics to virtual clinics, and almost most of the therapists (n= 32) continue working in inpatient ward, taking in their considerations the main measures that was adopted by the organization, when they deal with the direct patient contact which included: hand washing, mask use, material disinfection and gloves. The three administrative respondents work on quality issues, managerial guidelines and research. While the four orthotics/ prosthetics clinicians shifted their work to fabricate medical supportive devices to be used for the patients. Seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found it very convenient to the patients. CONCLUSIONS Our result revealed that most of the therapists/clinicians interrupted their regular work , impact number patient seen per day and face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to several reason such as spread of infection and the patients are afraid to come and they cancelled their appointment, however, half of the respondents continue with their existing work and taking into their considerations the measured that were adapted by the organization, the others who did not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance by using virtual visits.","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly nine months have passed since the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the rapidly spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, unprecedented precautionary strict measures were applied to prevent virus entry to the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives. The physical rehabilitation is the 3rd largest profession in the area of healthcare and is the most representative profession in the area of rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. Physical rehabilitation services provide the development, maintenance, and recovery of people’s movement and functional ability, improving their quality of life. In this way, many hospitalized patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as chronic patients, need physical rehabilitation services. This study aimed to determine the number of therapists/ clinicians who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the therapists/clinicians to continue serving and supporting their patients. METHODS The sample comprised 46 therapists/clinicians who worked in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), 19 (41.4%) males and 27 (58.6%) females. The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire applied mid-July to mid-August 2020 through email. The questionnaires consisted of four primary sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service. RESULTS Out of the 46 therapists/clinicians, 37 (80.4%) interrupted their work activities because of the pandemic and 9 (19.6%) continue with the existing daily practice. The number of patients seen/day before pandemic decreased compare to pre pandemic by21.7%, in arrange of 15 patients/day to zero patient/day by 26.1%, that led to change the way of therapists daily practice such as seven therapists shifted their clinics to virtual clinics, and almost most of the therapists (n= 32) continue working in inpatient ward, taking in their considerations the main measures that was adopted by the organization, when they deal with the direct patient contact which included: hand washing, mask use, material disinfection and gloves. The three administrative respondents work on quality issues, managerial guidelines and research. While the four orthotics/ prosthetics clinicians shifted their work to fabricate medical supportive devices to be used for the patients. Seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found it very convenient to the patients. CONCLUSIONS Our result revealed that most of the therapists/clinicians interrupted their regular work , impact number patient seen per day and face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to several reason such as spread of infection and the patients are afraid to come and they cancelled their appointment, however, half of the respondents continue with their existing work and taking into their considerations the measured that were adapted by the organization, the others who did not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance by using virtual visits.