Identification of the Material Hardening and Failure of an Aluminum Alloy Sheet via a Simple Shear Test

Q. Luo, Lin Yuan, Kelin Chen
{"title":"Identification of the Material Hardening and Failure of an Aluminum Alloy Sheet via a Simple Shear Test","authors":"Q. Luo, Lin Yuan, Kelin Chen","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-69574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Numerical simulation of the ductile failure of sheet metals usually requires a hardening response to large strains and a reliable failure criterion. This work investigates the material hardening and shear failure of AA6061-T6 sheet using a newly designed shear specimen. A series of numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the stress and strain states in some critical regions of the specimen, and an optimized geometry is obtained that delays the localized deformation on the edges of the specimen. The newly designed shear specimen is tested using a universal testing machine and the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique is adopted to monitor the strain field. The von Mises equivalent strain in the test section reaches 0.79 before the specimen fractures. For comparison, two simple shear tests of AA6061-T6 sheet based on two representative shear specimen designs from the literature are conducted using the same experimental setup. The two shear specimens fail at the strain level between 0.5 and 0.6, lower than the failure strain of 0.79 obtained in ours. This comparison shows the better performance of our newly designed shear specimen in the identification of the shear failure strain of this sheet. The shear stress-strain response of our specimen is also used to establish the material hardening response up to a maximum equivalent strain of 0.56, much higher than the limit strain of 0.09 from the uniaxial tension test, which demonstrates the advantage of using appropriately designed shear specimen in the material hardening identification of sheet metals.","PeriodicalId":23837,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Advanced Materials: Design, Processing, Characterization, and Applications","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Advanced Materials: Design, Processing, Characterization, and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Numerical simulation of the ductile failure of sheet metals usually requires a hardening response to large strains and a reliable failure criterion. This work investigates the material hardening and shear failure of AA6061-T6 sheet using a newly designed shear specimen. A series of numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the stress and strain states in some critical regions of the specimen, and an optimized geometry is obtained that delays the localized deformation on the edges of the specimen. The newly designed shear specimen is tested using a universal testing machine and the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique is adopted to monitor the strain field. The von Mises equivalent strain in the test section reaches 0.79 before the specimen fractures. For comparison, two simple shear tests of AA6061-T6 sheet based on two representative shear specimen designs from the literature are conducted using the same experimental setup. The two shear specimens fail at the strain level between 0.5 and 0.6, lower than the failure strain of 0.79 obtained in ours. This comparison shows the better performance of our newly designed shear specimen in the identification of the shear failure strain of this sheet. The shear stress-strain response of our specimen is also used to establish the material hardening response up to a maximum equivalent strain of 0.56, much higher than the limit strain of 0.09 from the uniaxial tension test, which demonstrates the advantage of using appropriately designed shear specimen in the material hardening identification of sheet metals.
通过简单剪切试验确定铝合金板的材料硬化和破坏
金属薄板塑性破坏的数值模拟通常需要大应变下的硬化响应和可靠的破坏准则。采用新设计的剪切试样对AA6061-T6板材的材料硬化和剪切破坏进行了研究。通过一系列数值模拟研究了试件关键区域的应力应变状态,得到了一种优化的几何形状,可以延缓试件边缘的局部变形。采用通用试验机对新设计的剪切试件进行了试验,并采用数字图像相关技术对应变场进行了监测。试件断裂前试件截面的von Mises等效应变达到0.79。为了进行对比,采用相同的试验装置,基于文献中两种具有代表性的剪切试件设计,对AA6061-T6薄板进行了两次单剪试验。两个剪切试件在0.5 ~ 0.6的应变水平下破坏,低于我们得到的0.79的破坏应变。通过对比可以看出,新设计的剪切试样在识别该薄板的剪切破坏应变方面具有较好的性能。试样的剪切应力-应变响应也被用来建立材料硬化响应,最大等效应变为0.56,远高于单轴拉伸试验的极限应变0.09,这表明使用适当设计的剪切试样在钣金材料硬化识别中的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信