The difference in scaling root-planing results between addition of photodynamic therapy and application of metronidazole gel of 25% in chronic periodontitis treatment

Andreas Tjandra, K. Murdiastuti, Al Sri Koes Soesilowati, Fitri Yuniawati
{"title":"The difference in scaling root-planing results between addition of photodynamic therapy and application of metronidazole gel of 25% in chronic periodontitis treatment","authors":"Andreas Tjandra, K. Murdiastuti, Al Sri Koes Soesilowati, Fitri Yuniawati","doi":"10.22146/majkedgiind.54560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scaling Root-Planing (SRP) is a mechanical treatment for removing hard and soft deposits as well as bacteria that adhere to the tooth surface. The additional use of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) can lead to damage of pathogen bacteria cell. Metronidazole is a common antibiotic with broad spectrum that goes againsts periodontal pathogen. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between combined treatment SRP+PDT and SRP+metronidazole gel 25% in treating chronic periodontitis from the clinical parameters of Pocket Depth (PD), Relative Attachment Level (RAL), Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI) and the number of bacterial colonies. The study samples were taken from 30 periodontal pocket points, which were divided into two treatment groups. The first group was treated with SRP, then had an application of chlorophyll into the pockets and was lighted by 405 nm light, while the second group was treated with SRP, and was applied by metronidazole gel 25% into the pocket. The procedures were started by taking bacteria in the pocket using paper point in two treatment groups, then measuring PD, RAL and PBI as the baseline. After the treatments, PD and RAL results were calculated within observation time of the baseline, the 3rd, the 6th and the 9th weeks, while PBI and the number of bacterial colony were calculated at the baseline and the 3rd week. Distribution of data was analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test and the data reduction used non parametric test of Mann Whitney. The result showed a decreasing level in PD, RAL, PBI and the number of bacterial colony in both groups, but significant difference was seen in PD, and RAL of the baseline of the 9th week. Thus, the study concludes that the combination of SRP+PDT has the same effectiveness when compared to the combination of SRP+metronidazole gel of 25% in chronic periodontitis treatment, and the result is even greater in reducing the level of PD and RAL as seen from the baseline of 9th week measurement.","PeriodicalId":31262,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","volume":"PP 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.54560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scaling Root-Planing (SRP) is a mechanical treatment for removing hard and soft deposits as well as bacteria that adhere to the tooth surface. The additional use of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) can lead to damage of pathogen bacteria cell. Metronidazole is a common antibiotic with broad spectrum that goes againsts periodontal pathogen. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between combined treatment SRP+PDT and SRP+metronidazole gel 25% in treating chronic periodontitis from the clinical parameters of Pocket Depth (PD), Relative Attachment Level (RAL), Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI) and the number of bacterial colonies. The study samples were taken from 30 periodontal pocket points, which were divided into two treatment groups. The first group was treated with SRP, then had an application of chlorophyll into the pockets and was lighted by 405 nm light, while the second group was treated with SRP, and was applied by metronidazole gel 25% into the pocket. The procedures were started by taking bacteria in the pocket using paper point in two treatment groups, then measuring PD, RAL and PBI as the baseline. After the treatments, PD and RAL results were calculated within observation time of the baseline, the 3rd, the 6th and the 9th weeks, while PBI and the number of bacterial colony were calculated at the baseline and the 3rd week. Distribution of data was analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test and the data reduction used non parametric test of Mann Whitney. The result showed a decreasing level in PD, RAL, PBI and the number of bacterial colony in both groups, but significant difference was seen in PD, and RAL of the baseline of the 9th week. Thus, the study concludes that the combination of SRP+PDT has the same effectiveness when compared to the combination of SRP+metronidazole gel of 25% in chronic periodontitis treatment, and the result is even greater in reducing the level of PD and RAL as seen from the baseline of 9th week measurement.
慢性牙周炎加光动力治疗与25%甲硝唑凝胶治疗牙根刮垢效果的差异
牙根刨除(SRP)是一种机械治疗方法,用于清除附着在牙齿表面的硬、软沉积物和细菌。光动力疗法(PDT)的额外使用会导致病原菌细胞的损伤。甲硝唑是一种常用的广谱抗菌素,用于治疗牙周病原体。本研究旨在从牙袋深度(PD)、相对附着水平(RAL)、乳头状出血指数(PBI)及菌落数量等临床指标比较SRP+PDT与SRP+ 25%甲硝唑凝胶联合治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效。研究样本取自30个牙周袋点,分为两组。第一组先用SRP处理,然后在口袋中施用叶绿素,用405 nm光照射;第二组用SRP处理,然后用25%的甲硝唑凝胶在口袋中施用。在两个治疗组中,首先用纸点取口袋中的细菌,然后测量PD、RAL和PBI作为基线。治疗结束后,分别在基线、第3周、第6周和第9周观察时间内计算PD和RAL结果,在基线和第3周计算PBI和菌落数。数据分布分析采用Shapiro Wilk检验,数据约简采用Mann Whitney非参数检验。结果显示,两组患者PD、RAL、PBI及菌落数均下降,但PD、RAL与第9周基线比较差异有统计学意义。因此,本研究得出SRP+PDT联合治疗慢性牙周炎的效果与SRP+ 25%甲硝唑凝胶联合治疗的效果相同,并且从第9周基线测量来看,在降低PD和RAL水平方面效果更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信