Effect of Body Posture on Lung Ventilation and Oxygenation During Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum in Rabbit

Iulia Melega, Cosmina Dejescu, M. Dragomir, C. Danciu, F. Matei, L. Oana, C. Peștean
{"title":"Effect of Body Posture on Lung Ventilation and Oxygenation During Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum in Rabbit","authors":"Iulia Melega, Cosmina Dejescu, M. Dragomir, C. Danciu, F. Matei, L. Oana, C. Peștean","doi":"10.15835/BUASVMCN-VM:2020.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to investigate the influence of body position on respiratory compliance and oxygenation during iatrogenic pneumoperitoneum in the rabbit. The peak inspiratory pressure, dynamic compliance, static compliance and arterial gas parameters were calculated and measured 10 min before and 30 min after the creation of pneumoperitoneum with the patient in the horizontal position, 30 min after placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position and 30 min after placing the patient in the reversed Trendelenburg position. Following the creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning, there was a significant increase in peak inspiratory pressure while dynamic and static respiratory compliance decreased. Similarly, arterial oxygenation increased during Trendelenburg position while arterial carbon pressure remained within limits during all positions. Overall, the reverse Trendelenburg position did not improve ventilation, neither the oxygenation. However, this position showed to be more appropriate because may reduce the risk of lung injury associated with high-pressure ventilation during pneumoperitoneum.","PeriodicalId":9470,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15835/BUASVMCN-VM:2020.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of body position on respiratory compliance and oxygenation during iatrogenic pneumoperitoneum in the rabbit. The peak inspiratory pressure, dynamic compliance, static compliance and arterial gas parameters were calculated and measured 10 min before and 30 min after the creation of pneumoperitoneum with the patient in the horizontal position, 30 min after placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position and 30 min after placing the patient in the reversed Trendelenburg position. Following the creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning, there was a significant increase in peak inspiratory pressure while dynamic and static respiratory compliance decreased. Similarly, arterial oxygenation increased during Trendelenburg position while arterial carbon pressure remained within limits during all positions. Overall, the reverse Trendelenburg position did not improve ventilation, neither the oxygenation. However, this position showed to be more appropriate because may reduce the risk of lung injury associated with high-pressure ventilation during pneumoperitoneum.
兔二氧化碳气腹时体位对肺通气和氧合的影响
本实验旨在探讨兔医源性气腹时体位对呼吸顺应性和氧合的影响。计算并测量患者水平体位气腹形成前10 min、后30 min、Trendelenburg体位放置后30 min、反Trendelenburg体位放置后30 min的峰值吸气压力、动态顺应性、静态顺应性和动脉气体参数。在气腹形成和Trendelenburg定位后,吸气峰值压力显著增加,而动态和静态呼吸顺应性下降。同样,在Trendelenburg体位期间,动脉氧合增加,而在所有体位期间动脉碳压保持在限制范围内。总的来说,反向Trendelenburg体位并没有改善通气,也没有改善氧合。然而,这种体位更合适,因为可以降低气腹期间高压通气引起肺损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信