Criminal Liability of Political Parties from the Perspective of Anti-Money Laundering Act

Q3 Social Sciences
M. S. E. Wangga, Dian Adriawan Dg. Tawang, Ahmad Sabirin, Andrés Herrera Esquivel
{"title":"Criminal Liability of Political Parties from the Perspective of Anti-Money Laundering Act","authors":"M. S. E. Wangga, Dian Adriawan Dg. Tawang, Ahmad Sabirin, Andrés Herrera Esquivel","doi":"10.15294/jils.v7i1.54534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research addresses the questions on, among other things, criminal liability of political parties from the perspective of the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering and the models of criminal liability of political parties with respect to criminal acts of money laundering. The juridical-normative research method used shows that political parties have met the criteria as corporations, being groups of people or assets to which the corporate criminal liability system applies. The fault of a political party in criminal acts of money laundering can be viewed through the actions of its administrators being a systemically integral part of the party as they have been given the roles by the party for the benefit of the party. The first conclusion is that a political party can be held criminally liable for criminal acts of money laundering. Secondly, the models of criminal liability of a political party in criminal acts of money laundering comprise (1) the model of criminal liability under Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering. (2) Administrative model guided by the principle of systematiche specialiteit and the method of economic analysis of law approach through the Political Party Law. (3) Restorative justice model in the form of dual track system. This model is the alternative companion to the penal justice system, namely the criminal model and administrative model.","PeriodicalId":32877,"journal":{"name":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.54534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research addresses the questions on, among other things, criminal liability of political parties from the perspective of the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering and the models of criminal liability of political parties with respect to criminal acts of money laundering. The juridical-normative research method used shows that political parties have met the criteria as corporations, being groups of people or assets to which the corporate criminal liability system applies. The fault of a political party in criminal acts of money laundering can be viewed through the actions of its administrators being a systemically integral part of the party as they have been given the roles by the party for the benefit of the party. The first conclusion is that a political party can be held criminally liable for criminal acts of money laundering. Secondly, the models of criminal liability of a political party in criminal acts of money laundering comprise (1) the model of criminal liability under Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering. (2) Administrative model guided by the principle of systematiche specialiteit and the method of economic analysis of law approach through the Political Party Law. (3) Restorative justice model in the form of dual track system. This model is the alternative companion to the penal justice system, namely the criminal model and administrative model.
从《反洗钱法》看政党的刑事责任
本研究除其他外,从《防止和根除洗钱犯罪行为法》和政党在洗钱犯罪行为方面的刑事责任模式的角度探讨了政党的刑事责任问题。所采用的司法规范研究方法表明,政党符合公司的标准,是公司刑事责任制度所适用的人或资产群体。政党在洗钱犯罪行为中的过错可以通过其行政人员作为政党的系统组成部分的行为来看待,因为他们是为了党的利益而被政党赋予角色的。第一个结论是,政党可以对洗钱犯罪行为承担刑事责任。其次,政党在洗钱犯罪行为中的刑事责任模式包括:(1)2010年《预防和根除洗钱犯罪行为第8号法》规定的刑事责任模式。(2)以系统论专门性原则为指导的行政管理模式和通过政党法途径的经济分析方法。(3)双轨制形式的恢复性司法模式。这种模式是刑事司法制度的替代伴侣,即刑事模式和行政模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信