Overview of Bioethical Issues in Contemporary PTSD Treatment and Research: Considering Priorities for Future Empirical Ethics Investigation

Shaili Jain, Deborah Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, S. Lindley
{"title":"Overview of Bioethical Issues in Contemporary PTSD Treatment and Research: Considering Priorities for Future Empirical Ethics Investigation","authors":"Shaili Jain, Deborah Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, S. Lindley","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.629640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last decade has seen a surge in biomedical research advancing the evidence base for the effective clinical management and study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors review the literature describing ethical issues in conducting PTSD research; controversies over the role of preventive pharmacotherapy for PTSD; and ethical quandaries in the identification, treatment, or empirical investigation of PTSD in postdisaster settings. Findings are synthesized within an ethics framework that utilizes major constructs in the biomedical literature: beneficence/nonmaleficence, informed consent, and autonomy. Gaps and weaknesses in the current evidence base are highlighted. The authors conclude by considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation in this field.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"20 1","pages":"26 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.629640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The last decade has seen a surge in biomedical research advancing the evidence base for the effective clinical management and study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors review the literature describing ethical issues in conducting PTSD research; controversies over the role of preventive pharmacotherapy for PTSD; and ethical quandaries in the identification, treatment, or empirical investigation of PTSD in postdisaster settings. Findings are synthesized within an ethics framework that utilizes major constructs in the biomedical literature: beneficence/nonmaleficence, informed consent, and autonomy. Gaps and weaknesses in the current evidence base are highlighted. The authors conclude by considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation in this field.
当代创伤后应激障碍治疗和研究中的生物伦理问题综述:考虑未来实证伦理调查的优先事项
在过去的十年中,生物医学研究的激增为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的有效临床管理和研究提供了证据基础。作者回顾了描述PTSD研究中的伦理问题的文献;关于PTSD预防性药物治疗作用的争议;以及在灾后环境中PTSD的识别、治疗或实证调查中的伦理困境。研究结果是在一个伦理框架内综合的,该框架利用了生物医学文献中的主要结构:有益/无害、知情同意和自主。强调了当前证据基础中的差距和弱点。最后,作者考虑了未来在这一领域的实证伦理调查的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信