A Lost Opportunity: The Case of the Water Reform Debate in the Fourth Parliament of Zimbabwe

Zambezia Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V28I1.6761
E. Manzungu
{"title":"A Lost Opportunity: The Case of the Water Reform Debate in the Fourth Parliament of Zimbabwe","authors":"E. Manzungu","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V28I1.6761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the debate on water reform that took place in the fourth Parliament of Zimbabwe leading up to the enactment of the Water Act [Chapter 20: 24] and the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA) Act [Chapter 20:25]. It assesses how Members of Parliament tried to ensure the utilisation and management of the country's water resources for the benefit of their constituencies, most of them disadvantaged smallholder farmers, and the nation in general. Using Moore (1989)'s critique of the neo-liberal doctrine in water management, that emphasizes \"the market\" and technical efficiency, as water use-regulating mechanisms, it is argued that the debate failed to push for a more people-oriented water reform. This is illustrated in the article with regards to the goal of the reform torn between economictechnical and social objectives, lack of strong local institutions to hirther the democratic ideals and poor financing of water resource development. Overall the debate failed to place on the national agenda sustainable water development. Perhaps at a later date the lost opportunity can be regained by way of amending the concerned Acts of parliament.","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"19 1","pages":"97-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V28I1.6761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

This article analyses the debate on water reform that took place in the fourth Parliament of Zimbabwe leading up to the enactment of the Water Act [Chapter 20: 24] and the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA) Act [Chapter 20:25]. It assesses how Members of Parliament tried to ensure the utilisation and management of the country's water resources for the benefit of their constituencies, most of them disadvantaged smallholder farmers, and the nation in general. Using Moore (1989)'s critique of the neo-liberal doctrine in water management, that emphasizes "the market" and technical efficiency, as water use-regulating mechanisms, it is argued that the debate failed to push for a more people-oriented water reform. This is illustrated in the article with regards to the goal of the reform torn between economictechnical and social objectives, lack of strong local institutions to hirther the democratic ideals and poor financing of water resource development. Overall the debate failed to place on the national agenda sustainable water development. Perhaps at a later date the lost opportunity can be regained by way of amending the concerned Acts of parliament.
失去的机会:津巴布韦第四届议会的水改革辩论案例
本文分析了津巴布韦第四届议会关于水改革的辩论,这些辩论导致了《水法》(第20:24章)和《津巴布韦国家水务局法》(第20:25章)的颁布。它评估了国会议员如何努力确保国家水资源的利用和管理,以造福于他们的选区,其中大多数是处于不利地位的小农,以及整个国家。利用摩尔(1989)对水管理中强调“市场”和技术效率作为水使用调节机制的新自由主义的批评,认为辩论未能推动更加以人为本的水改革。这在文章中说明了改革的目标在经济、技术和社会目标之间左右为难,缺乏促进民主理想的强有力的地方机构,以及水资源开发筹资不足。总的来说,这场辩论未能将可持续水资源开发列入国家议程。也许在晚些时候,可以通过修改议会的有关法案来重新获得失去的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信