Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch
{"title":"Classification between early onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using a single neuroimaging feature","authors":"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch","doi":"10.1117/12.2632990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.","PeriodicalId":13820,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","volume":"71 1","pages":"122040D - 122040D-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.