Application Geological Strength Index (GSI) quantification method on the characterization of carbonate rock mass

IF 0.7 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
S. Saptono, Danu Mirza Rezky
{"title":"Application Geological Strength Index (GSI) quantification method on the characterization of carbonate rock mass","authors":"S. Saptono, Danu Mirza Rezky","doi":"10.46873/2300-3960.1387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Determining GSI as a representation of the presence of rock mass in slope analysis continues to develop. The development of the quantitative GSI method was carried out because the basic (qualitative) GSI values were deemed too subjective so the results from the use of the quantitative GSIwere expected to be more objective and accurate. The method used is to combine 3 GSI quantitative methods to find GSI based on surface conditions and joint structure. The results showed that the Quantitative GSI value was smaller than the GSI predictive value (qualitative). The GSI approach with RQD and UCS parameters is also presented to describe rock mass conditions due to changes in GSI values, and the third result shows a directly proportional relationship, the greater the GSI value, the greater the RQD and UCS values. The combined application of these three quantification methods is suitable for slopes that have not been properly exposed so that surface and structural conditions can only be seen from visual observations of outcrops and some initial construction slopes.","PeriodicalId":37284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Determining GSI as a representation of the presence of rock mass in slope analysis continues to develop. The development of the quantitative GSI method was carried out because the basic (qualitative) GSI values were deemed too subjective so the results from the use of the quantitative GSIwere expected to be more objective and accurate. The method used is to combine 3 GSI quantitative methods to find GSI based on surface conditions and joint structure. The results showed that the Quantitative GSI value was smaller than the GSI predictive value (qualitative). The GSI approach with RQD and UCS parameters is also presented to describe rock mass conditions due to changes in GSI values, and the third result shows a directly proportional relationship, the greater the GSI value, the greater the RQD and UCS values. The combined application of these three quantification methods is suitable for slopes that have not been properly exposed so that surface and structural conditions can only be seen from visual observations of outcrops and some initial construction slopes.
地质强度指数(GSI)量化方法在碳酸盐岩岩体表征中的应用
确定GSI作为边坡分析中岩体存在的表征的方法在不断发展。定量GSI方法的发展是因为基本(定性)GSI值被认为过于主观,因此期望使用定量GSI的结果更加客观和准确。所采用的方法是结合3种GSI定量方法,根据表面条件和节理结构寻找GSI。结果表明,定量GSI值小于定量GSI预测值(定性)。利用RQD和UCS参数的GSI方法来描述GSI值变化引起的岩体状况,第三个结果显示成正比关系,GSI值越大,RQD和UCS值越大。这三种量化方法的联合应用适用于未适当暴露的边坡,因此只能通过露头和一些初始施工边坡的目视观察来了解地表和结构状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Journal of Sustainable Mining Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信