Transformations of Race and Class in South Africa: Discussion Article of Book on Urban Inequality: Theory, Evidence and Method in Johannesburg by Owen Crankshaw

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
David K. C. Cooper
{"title":"Transformations of Race and Class in South Africa: Discussion Article of Book on Urban Inequality: Theory, Evidence and Method in Johannesburg by Owen Crankshaw","authors":"David K. C. Cooper","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2023.2183251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This Discussion Article examines the exciting, innovative new book (2022) by Owen Crankshaw. It focuses on a summary including some comments on Crankshaw‘s key findings for the Greater Johannesburg Area for 1970–2011. It focuses primarily on his book’s Part 1 on issues of “Occupational Class Structure transformations”, but with some consideration also of Part 2 on geographical housing “Spatial Order transformations” by race and class (the author’s concepts). These core findings on socioeconomic transformations over this 40-year period have very important implications for political debate about the future of South Africa. These debates are vital not only for academics, but equally for public intellectuals and social activists in our country, and also for a wider readership in other countries particularly of the South where such urban inequality questions of class, poverty and social marginalization are fundamental. With this broad audience in mind, empirical findings are summarized and its methodology assessed, in general in very favorable light. Nonetheless, critical questions are raised about the book’s reliance on comparative case studies of cities of the North with little reflection on political implications for “Southern” cities. It is also critiqued for insufficient theoretical consideration of the impact of a global post-1970s, knowledge-based Capitalist Industrial Revolution on the class structure of Johannesburg. Notwithstanding, this is a sociological book of very high scholarship whose findings about post-Apartheid South African transformation are a must-read and must-debate.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"12 1","pages":"104 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2023.2183251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Discussion Article examines the exciting, innovative new book (2022) by Owen Crankshaw. It focuses on a summary including some comments on Crankshaw‘s key findings for the Greater Johannesburg Area for 1970–2011. It focuses primarily on his book’s Part 1 on issues of “Occupational Class Structure transformations”, but with some consideration also of Part 2 on geographical housing “Spatial Order transformations” by race and class (the author’s concepts). These core findings on socioeconomic transformations over this 40-year period have very important implications for political debate about the future of South Africa. These debates are vital not only for academics, but equally for public intellectuals and social activists in our country, and also for a wider readership in other countries particularly of the South where such urban inequality questions of class, poverty and social marginalization are fundamental. With this broad audience in mind, empirical findings are summarized and its methodology assessed, in general in very favorable light. Nonetheless, critical questions are raised about the book’s reliance on comparative case studies of cities of the North with little reflection on political implications for “Southern” cities. It is also critiqued for insufficient theoretical consideration of the impact of a global post-1970s, knowledge-based Capitalist Industrial Revolution on the class structure of Johannesburg. Notwithstanding, this is a sociological book of very high scholarship whose findings about post-Apartheid South African transformation are a must-read and must-debate.
南非种族和阶级的转变:欧文·克兰肖《约翰内斯堡的城市不平等:理论、证据和方法》一书的讨论文章
本文探讨了欧文·克兰肖(Owen Crankshaw)令人兴奋、创新的新书(2022)。它的重点是一个总结,包括对曲克肖1970-2011年对大约翰内斯堡地区的主要发现的一些评论。它主要集中在他的书的第一部分关于“职业阶级结构转换”的问题,但也考虑到第二部分关于地理住房的“空间秩序转换”的种族和阶级(作者的概念)。这些关于这40年期间社会经济转型的核心发现对有关南非未来的政治辩论具有非常重要的意义。这些辩论不仅对学术界至关重要,对我国的公共知识分子和社会活动家也同样重要,对其他国家,特别是南方国家的广大读者也至关重要,在这些国家,阶级、贫困和社会边缘化等城市不平等问题是根本问题。考虑到这一广泛的受众,总结了经验发现,并对其方法进行了评估,总体上是非常有利的。尽管如此,人们还是提出了一些关键的问题,即这本书依赖于对北方城市的比较案例研究,而对“南方”城市的政治影响却很少反思。它也被批评为缺乏对20世纪70年代后全球知识型资本主义工业革命对约翰内斯堡阶级结构影响的理论考虑。尽管如此,这是一本学术性很高的社会学著作,其中关于后种族隔离时代南非转型的发现是必读和必须讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信