Unconditionally positive finite difference and standard explicit finite difference schemes for power flow equation

B. Drljača, S. Savović
{"title":"Unconditionally positive finite difference and standard explicit finite difference schemes for power flow equation","authors":"B. Drljača, S. Savović","doi":"10.5937/univtho9-23312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power flow equation for step-index glass optical fiber was solved using recently reported unconditionally-positive finite difference (UPFD) scheme. Solution obtained using UPFD scheme was compared with solution obtained using standard explicit finite difference (EFD) scheme. For accuracy testing both schemes were compared with analytical solution for steady state distribution of given fiber. The advantage of UPFD is reflected in stability of the scheme regardless of discretization step taken. Nevertheless EFD scheme has better concurrence with analytical solution than UPFD. This is due to the additional truncation-error terms in the approximations of the first and second derivatives with respect to θ.","PeriodicalId":22896,"journal":{"name":"The University Thought - Publication in Natural Sciences","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University Thought - Publication in Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/univtho9-23312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Power flow equation for step-index glass optical fiber was solved using recently reported unconditionally-positive finite difference (UPFD) scheme. Solution obtained using UPFD scheme was compared with solution obtained using standard explicit finite difference (EFD) scheme. For accuracy testing both schemes were compared with analytical solution for steady state distribution of given fiber. The advantage of UPFD is reflected in stability of the scheme regardless of discretization step taken. Nevertheless EFD scheme has better concurrence with analytical solution than UPFD. This is due to the additional truncation-error terms in the approximations of the first and second derivatives with respect to θ.
潮流方程的无条件正有限差分格式和标准显式有限差分格式
采用近年来报道的无条件正有限差分(UPFD)格式求解了阶跃折射率玻璃光纤的功率流方程。将UPFD格式解与标准显式有限差分格式解进行了比较。为了精度测试,将两种方案与给定光纤稳态分布的解析解进行了比较。UPFD的优点体现在无论采取何种离散步骤,该方法都具有较好的稳定性。与UPFD相比,EFD方案具有更好的解析解并行性。这是由于在一阶导数和二阶导数对θ的近似中附加了截断误差项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信