Development of a Stope Stability Prediction Model Using Ensemble Learning Techniques - A Case Study

F. Saadaari, D. Mireku-Gyimah, B. Olaleye
{"title":"Development of a Stope Stability Prediction Model Using Ensemble Learning Techniques - A Case Study","authors":"F. Saadaari, D. Mireku-Gyimah, B. Olaleye","doi":"10.4314/gm.v20i2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consequences of collapsed stopes can be dire in the mining industry. This can lead to the revocation of a mining license in most jurisdictions, especially when the harm costs lives. Therefore, as a mine planning and technical services engineer, it is imperative to estimate the stability status of stopes. This study has attempted to produce a stope stability prediction model adopted from stability graph using ensemble learning techniques. This study was conducted using 472 case histories from 120 stopes of AngloGold Ashanti Ghana, Obuasi Mine. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Bootstrap Aggregating and Adaptive Boosting classification algorithms were used to produce the models. A comparative analysis was done using six classification performance metrics namely Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity, F1-score, Specificity and Mathews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) to determine which ensemble learning technique performed best in predicting the stability of a stope. The Bootstrap Aggregating model obtained the highest MCC score of 96.84% while the Adaptive Boosting model obtained the lowest score. The Specificity scores in decreasing order of performance were 98.95%, 97.89%, 96.32% and 95.26% for Bootstrap Aggregating, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest and Adaptive Boosting respectively. The results showed equal Accuracy, Precision, F1-score and Sensitivity score of 97.89% for the Bootstrap Aggregating model while the same observation was made for Adaptive Boosting, Gradient Boosting and Random Forest with 90.53%, 92.63% and 95.79% scores respectively. At a 95% confidence interval using Wilson Score Interval, the results showed that the Bootstrap Aggregating model produced the minimal error and hence was selected as the alternative stope design tool for predicting the stability status of stopes. \n  \nKeywords: Stope Stability, Ensemble Learning Techniques, Stability Graph, Machine Learning","PeriodicalId":12530,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Mining Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Mining Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gm.v20i2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The consequences of collapsed stopes can be dire in the mining industry. This can lead to the revocation of a mining license in most jurisdictions, especially when the harm costs lives. Therefore, as a mine planning and technical services engineer, it is imperative to estimate the stability status of stopes. This study has attempted to produce a stope stability prediction model adopted from stability graph using ensemble learning techniques. This study was conducted using 472 case histories from 120 stopes of AngloGold Ashanti Ghana, Obuasi Mine. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Bootstrap Aggregating and Adaptive Boosting classification algorithms were used to produce the models. A comparative analysis was done using six classification performance metrics namely Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity, F1-score, Specificity and Mathews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) to determine which ensemble learning technique performed best in predicting the stability of a stope. The Bootstrap Aggregating model obtained the highest MCC score of 96.84% while the Adaptive Boosting model obtained the lowest score. The Specificity scores in decreasing order of performance were 98.95%, 97.89%, 96.32% and 95.26% for Bootstrap Aggregating, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest and Adaptive Boosting respectively. The results showed equal Accuracy, Precision, F1-score and Sensitivity score of 97.89% for the Bootstrap Aggregating model while the same observation was made for Adaptive Boosting, Gradient Boosting and Random Forest with 90.53%, 92.63% and 95.79% scores respectively. At a 95% confidence interval using Wilson Score Interval, the results showed that the Bootstrap Aggregating model produced the minimal error and hence was selected as the alternative stope design tool for predicting the stability status of stopes.   Keywords: Stope Stability, Ensemble Learning Techniques, Stability Graph, Machine Learning
利用集成学习技术开发采场稳定性预测模型-一个案例研究
在采矿业中,采场坍塌的后果可能是可怕的。在大多数司法管辖区,这可能导致采矿许可证被吊销,尤其是在危害造成生命损失的情况下。因此,作为矿山规划和技术服务工程师,对采场的稳定状态进行评估势在必行。本研究尝试利用集成学习技术从稳定性图中建立采场稳定性预测模型。本研究使用AngloGold Ashanti Ghana, Obuasi矿山120个采场的472个案例进行。使用随机森林、梯度增强、自举聚合和自适应增强分类算法生成模型。通过准确性、精密度、灵敏度、f1评分、特异性和马修斯相关系数(MCC) 6个分类性能指标进行对比分析,确定哪种集成学习技术在预测采场稳定性方面表现最好。Bootstrap Aggregating模型的MCC得分最高,达到96.84%,Adaptive Boosting模型的MCC得分最低。自举聚合(Bootstrap Aggregating)、梯度增强(Gradient Boosting)、随机森林(Random Forest)和自适应增强(Adaptive Boosting)的特异性得分分别为98.95%、97.89%、96.32%和95.26%。结果表明,Bootstrap Aggregating模型的Accuracy、Precision、f1得分和Sensitivity得分均为97.89%,Adaptive Boosting、Gradient Boosting和Random Forest模型的准确率分别为90.53%、92.63%和95.79%。在95%的置信区间内,结果表明Bootstrap Aggregating模型产生的误差最小,因此被选为预测采场稳定状态的备选采场设计工具。关键词:采场稳定性,集成学习技术,稳定性图,机器学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信