Awareness, Social Media, Ethnicity and Religion: are they Responsible for Vaccination Hesitancy? A Systematic Review with Annotated Bibliography

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
N. Khan, N. Hussain, A. Naz
{"title":"Awareness, Social Media, Ethnicity and Religion: are they Responsible for Vaccination Hesitancy? A Systematic Review with Annotated Bibliography","authors":"N. Khan, N. Hussain, A. Naz","doi":"10.22359/cswhi_13_4_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination is not only a medical term rather it is framed under socio-cultural perspectives and debates as well. Human history is full of illnesses caused bacteria and viruses killing millions of people including children and adults. Technological development in the health sector enabled to combat pathogenic illnesses through different methods whereby vaccination is one of them. However, it is a dilemma that vaccination has faced many barriers including logistical but most importantly sociocultural and religious. In 2019, WHO revealed vaccine hesitancy as a leading threat to health throughout the globe even in the top 10. This study looks to analyze peer reviewed literature to explore barriers to vaccination. Methodologically, this is desk research and systematic review. Numerous databases were searched with key words and purposively studies were selected for this study. A total of 17 most relevant studies were sampled. Findings show that there are four major factors hindering vaccination. 1st cultural and ethnic background matters whereby religion and the belief system are predominant factors. 2nd awareness and educational variables are also there, for instance, it is noted that many people are not aware of vaccination process specifically in case of HPV vaccination. 3rd social media plays a pivotal role whereby misinformation internalizes negative attitudes and misperceptions about vaccines. 4th social media is a key dimension whereby disinformation and misinformation are communicated through platforms whereby some are intentionally circulated. It is suggested that culturally relativism perspective can be helpful in increasing vaccination percentages. It pertains to intervention through culturally approved methods, for example, sensitizing the ethnic backgrounds through their leadership. In addition, vaccination tracking, media campaigns, focus on school level education to include health related course can be helpful.","PeriodicalId":42256,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22359/cswhi_13_4_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vaccination is not only a medical term rather it is framed under socio-cultural perspectives and debates as well. Human history is full of illnesses caused bacteria and viruses killing millions of people including children and adults. Technological development in the health sector enabled to combat pathogenic illnesses through different methods whereby vaccination is one of them. However, it is a dilemma that vaccination has faced many barriers including logistical but most importantly sociocultural and religious. In 2019, WHO revealed vaccine hesitancy as a leading threat to health throughout the globe even in the top 10. This study looks to analyze peer reviewed literature to explore barriers to vaccination. Methodologically, this is desk research and systematic review. Numerous databases were searched with key words and purposively studies were selected for this study. A total of 17 most relevant studies were sampled. Findings show that there are four major factors hindering vaccination. 1st cultural and ethnic background matters whereby religion and the belief system are predominant factors. 2nd awareness and educational variables are also there, for instance, it is noted that many people are not aware of vaccination process specifically in case of HPV vaccination. 3rd social media plays a pivotal role whereby misinformation internalizes negative attitudes and misperceptions about vaccines. 4th social media is a key dimension whereby disinformation and misinformation are communicated through platforms whereby some are intentionally circulated. It is suggested that culturally relativism perspective can be helpful in increasing vaccination percentages. It pertains to intervention through culturally approved methods, for example, sensitizing the ethnic backgrounds through their leadership. In addition, vaccination tracking, media campaigns, focus on school level education to include health related course can be helpful.
意识、社交媒体、种族和宗教:它们是疫苗接种犹豫的原因吗?带注释参考书目的系统综述
疫苗接种不仅是一个医学术语,而且是在社会文化观点和辩论下形成的。人类历史上充满了由细菌和病毒引起的疾病,导致数百万人死亡,包括儿童和成人。卫生部门的技术发展使人们能够通过不同的方法来防治致病性疾病,接种疫苗就是其中之一。然而,疫苗接种面临许多障碍,包括后勤障碍,但最重要的是社会文化和宗教障碍,这是一个困境。2019年,世卫组织披露,疫苗犹豫是全球健康的主要威胁,即使在前10名中也是如此。本研究旨在分析同行评议的文献,以探索接种疫苗的障碍。方法上,这是案头研究和系统回顾。通过关键词检索大量的数据库,选择有目的的研究进行本研究。总共抽样了17项最相关的研究。研究结果表明,有四个主要因素阻碍疫苗接种。第一,文化和民族背景问题,其中宗教和信仰体系是主要因素。第二,意识和教育变量也存在,例如,值得注意的是,许多人不了解疫苗接种过程,特别是HPV疫苗接种。第三,社交媒体在错误信息内化对疫苗的负面态度和误解方面发挥着关键作用。第四,社交媒体是虚假信息和错误信息通过平台传播的关键维度,其中一些是故意传播的。建议文化相对主义观点有助于提高疫苗接种率。它涉及通过文化上认可的方法进行干预,例如,通过他们的领导使种族背景敏感。此外,疫苗接种跟踪、媒体宣传、侧重于学校一级的教育,包括与健康相关的课程,可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention
Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信