Comparison of Two Surgical Hand Antiseptic Techniques: Hand Rubbing and Hand Washing With Alcohol-Based Agent and 7.5% Povidone Iodine

Ziba Asadpoor-Dezaki, A. Barabady, D. Abtahi
{"title":"Comparison of Two Surgical Hand Antiseptic Techniques: Hand Rubbing and Hand Washing With Alcohol-Based Agent and 7.5% Povidone Iodine","authors":"Ziba Asadpoor-Dezaki, A. Barabady, D. Abtahi","doi":"10.17795/CCN-8255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hand disinfection is a major part of infection control during a surgical procedure. In contrast to developed countries, where the use of alcohol-based solutions (ABS) is routine, the usual practice in Iran is hand scrubbing using Povidone Iodine Solution (PVI). Most researchers have concluded that ABS might be superior to PVI, but others have found no differences. In this study the disinfection efficacy of ABS was compared to PVI. Methods: Thirty-one volunteers including surgeons and operating room nurses (OR-nurses) participated in this cross over design study. For one week they used ABS and the next week they used PVI for pre-surgical hand disinfection. Samples were obtained from the hands of all participants before, immediately after and two hours after hand washing. The bacterial contamination rate was evaluated by a microbiologist. Results: Our results demonstrated that ABS led to significantly lower mean Colony Forming Units (CFU) immediately after hand disinfection, but no significant differences were found between the two groups after two hours. Also, alcohol-based solution revealed a significantly higher logarithmic reduction factor (RF) of skin flora as an instantaneous effect. Both solutions were effective against Staphylococcus aureus, but the minimum reduction rate was in eliminating the Bacillus group. Conclusions: In conclusion, ABS can be promoted as the best choice for surgical hand disinfection solution amongst emergency situations, in that it has a time saving character and better instantaneous effect on bacterial skin flora reduction.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/CCN-8255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Hand disinfection is a major part of infection control during a surgical procedure. In contrast to developed countries, where the use of alcohol-based solutions (ABS) is routine, the usual practice in Iran is hand scrubbing using Povidone Iodine Solution (PVI). Most researchers have concluded that ABS might be superior to PVI, but others have found no differences. In this study the disinfection efficacy of ABS was compared to PVI. Methods: Thirty-one volunteers including surgeons and operating room nurses (OR-nurses) participated in this cross over design study. For one week they used ABS and the next week they used PVI for pre-surgical hand disinfection. Samples were obtained from the hands of all participants before, immediately after and two hours after hand washing. The bacterial contamination rate was evaluated by a microbiologist. Results: Our results demonstrated that ABS led to significantly lower mean Colony Forming Units (CFU) immediately after hand disinfection, but no significant differences were found between the two groups after two hours. Also, alcohol-based solution revealed a significantly higher logarithmic reduction factor (RF) of skin flora as an instantaneous effect. Both solutions were effective against Staphylococcus aureus, but the minimum reduction rate was in eliminating the Bacillus group. Conclusions: In conclusion, ABS can be promoted as the best choice for surgical hand disinfection solution amongst emergency situations, in that it has a time saving character and better instantaneous effect on bacterial skin flora reduction.
两种外科手部消毒技术:酒精基消毒剂和7.5%聚维酮碘搓手和洗手的比较
背景:手部消毒是外科手术过程中感染控制的重要组成部分。与常规使用酒精基溶液(ABS)的发达国家不同,伊朗的通常做法是使用聚维酮碘溶液(PVI)进行手洗。大多数研究人员得出结论,ABS可能优于PVI,但其他人没有发现差异。本研究比较了ABS与PVI的消毒效果。方法:包括外科医生和手术室护士在内的31名志愿者参与了这项交叉设计研究。他们先用ABS消毒一周,再用PVI消毒一周。从所有参与者洗手前、洗手后和洗手后两小时的手上采集样本。微生物学家评估了细菌污染率。结果:我们的研究结果表明,ABS在手部消毒后立即显著降低了平均菌落形成单位(CFU),但在2小时后两组之间没有显著差异。此外,基于酒精的溶液显示皮肤菌群的对数减少因子(RF)显着更高,作为瞬时效应。两种溶液对金黄色葡萄球菌均有效,但对芽孢杆菌群的抑制率最低。结论:ABS可作为紧急情况下手术手消液的最佳选择,具有节省时间的特点,对皮肤细菌菌群的瞬时减少效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信