Metric Dimension Parameterized by Feedback Vertex Set and Other Structural Parameters

Esther Galby, Liana Khazaliya, Fionn Mc Inerney, Roohani Sharma, P. Tale
{"title":"Metric Dimension Parameterized by Feedback Vertex Set and Other Structural Parameters","authors":"Esther Galby, Liana Khazaliya, Fionn Mc Inerney, Roohani Sharma, P. Tale","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.15424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a graph $G$, a subset $S \\subseteq V(G)$ is called a \\emph{resolving set} if for any two vertices $u,v \\in V(G)$, there exists a vertex $w \\in S$ such that $d(w,u) \\neq d(w,v)$. The {\\sc Metric Dimension} problem takes as input a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, and asks whether there exists a resolving set of size at most $k$. This problem was introduced in the 1970s and is known to be \\NP-hard~[GT~61 in Garey and Johnson's book]. In the realm of parameterized complexity, Hartung and Nichterlein~[CCC~2013] proved that the problem is \\W[2]-hard when parameterized by the natural parameter $k$. They also observed that it is \\FPT\\ when parameterized by the vertex cover number and asked about its complexity under \\emph{smaller} parameters, in particular the feedback vertex set number. We answer this question by proving that {\\sc Metric Dimension} is \\W[1]-hard when parameterized by the combined parameter feedback vertex set number plus pathwidth. This also improves the result of Bonnet and Purohit~[IPEC 2019] which states that the problem is \\W[1]-hard parameterized by the pathwidth. On the positive side, we show that {\\sc Metric Dimension} is \\FPT\\ when parameterized by either the distance to cluster or the distance to co-cluster, both of which are smaller parameters than the vertex cover number.","PeriodicalId":21749,"journal":{"name":"SIAM J. Discret. Math.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM J. Discret. Math.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.15424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For a graph $G$, a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called a \emph{resolving set} if for any two vertices $u,v \in V(G)$, there exists a vertex $w \in S$ such that $d(w,u) \neq d(w,v)$. The {\sc Metric Dimension} problem takes as input a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, and asks whether there exists a resolving set of size at most $k$. This problem was introduced in the 1970s and is known to be \NP-hard~[GT~61 in Garey and Johnson's book]. In the realm of parameterized complexity, Hartung and Nichterlein~[CCC~2013] proved that the problem is \W[2]-hard when parameterized by the natural parameter $k$. They also observed that it is \FPT\ when parameterized by the vertex cover number and asked about its complexity under \emph{smaller} parameters, in particular the feedback vertex set number. We answer this question by proving that {\sc Metric Dimension} is \W[1]-hard when parameterized by the combined parameter feedback vertex set number plus pathwidth. This also improves the result of Bonnet and Purohit~[IPEC 2019] which states that the problem is \W[1]-hard parameterized by the pathwidth. On the positive side, we show that {\sc Metric Dimension} is \FPT\ when parameterized by either the distance to cluster or the distance to co-cluster, both of which are smaller parameters than the vertex cover number.
由反馈顶点集和其他结构参数参数化度量维度
对于图$G$,如果对于任意两个顶点$u,v \in V(G)$,存在一个顶点$w \in S$使得$d(w,u) \neq d(w,v)$,则子集$S \subseteq V(G)$称为\emph{解析集}。{\scMetric Dimension}问题以一个图$G$和一个正整数$k$作为输入,并询问是否存在一个大小不超过$k$的解析集。这个问题是在20世纪70年代提出的,已知是\NP -hard [Garey和Johnson的书中的GT 61]。在参数化复杂度领域,Hartung和Nichterlein [CCC 2013]证明了当用自然参数$k$参数化时问题是\W[2] -hard。他们还观察到,当用顶点覆盖数参数化时,它是\FPT,并询问了它在\emph{较小}参数下的复杂性,特别是反馈顶点集数。我们通过证明用参数反馈顶点集数加路径宽度的组合参数化{\sc度量维度}是\W[1] -hard来回答这个问题。这也改进了Bonnet和Purohit [IPEC 2019]的结果,该结果指出问题是\W[1] -硬参数化的路径宽度。从积极的方面来看,我们表明,当用到簇的距离或到共簇的距离参数化时,{\sc度量维度}是\FPT,这两个参数都比顶点覆盖数小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信