{"title":"Editor’s Note","authors":"Jane Tylus","doi":"10.1086/708191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue opens with a Florentine wedding and speculations on its mysterious host (Judith Bryce’s “Decoding Codename 16”). The Berenson collection features several works related to weddings, but the one that particularly caught my eye features trumpeters, coy maidens, dejected suitors, and a haggard looking husband-to-be: Francesco Botticini’s Sposalizio della Vergine (fig. 1). What’s more, it was painted for a church in Florence—San Felice in Piazza on the Oltrarno— some five years before the marriage ceremony discussed by Bryce. And even though in 1918 Bernard Berenson thought the panel he had recently purchased was by the Perugian painter Giovanni Boccati, he cited the plausibility of earlier arguments attributing it to Fra Angelico, given that “much . . . in the composition suggests Florence.” Botticini’s Marriage of the Virgin may indeed be reminiscent of Florentine weddings and sites, and not simply because Botticini was Florentine. The seven pillars may look to the library of San Marco designed by Michelozzo, the same architect behind the Renaissance facade of the church where Botticini’s work was once housed. The trumpeters themselves, awash in red and by far the most colorful members of the wedding party (although Mary’s now-gray dress was once a glowing purple, as Laurence Kanter notes) were staples at Florentine ceremonies. The painting features a daring asymmetry—the space behind Joseph is much more crowded and busier than the comparatively vacant space occupied by Mary’s calm handmaidens—and at least one tantalizing puzzle: of the four doors that line the room, the one to Mary’s right is slightly ajar. Perhaps it’s out of carelessness, or perhaps it’s a sign of the opening into a new life for Mary and her husband— and for all future Christians. But Botticini seems to make this moment more solemn than festive, judging from Joseph's concentrated expression and Mary's modest demeanor as she shuts her eyes. (The jilted male suitors, two of whom are seen breaking their rods, would no doubt describe the occasion differently.)","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This issue opens with a Florentine wedding and speculations on its mysterious host (Judith Bryce’s “Decoding Codename 16”). The Berenson collection features several works related to weddings, but the one that particularly caught my eye features trumpeters, coy maidens, dejected suitors, and a haggard looking husband-to-be: Francesco Botticini’s Sposalizio della Vergine (fig. 1). What’s more, it was painted for a church in Florence—San Felice in Piazza on the Oltrarno— some five years before the marriage ceremony discussed by Bryce. And even though in 1918 Bernard Berenson thought the panel he had recently purchased was by the Perugian painter Giovanni Boccati, he cited the plausibility of earlier arguments attributing it to Fra Angelico, given that “much . . . in the composition suggests Florence.” Botticini’s Marriage of the Virgin may indeed be reminiscent of Florentine weddings and sites, and not simply because Botticini was Florentine. The seven pillars may look to the library of San Marco designed by Michelozzo, the same architect behind the Renaissance facade of the church where Botticini’s work was once housed. The trumpeters themselves, awash in red and by far the most colorful members of the wedding party (although Mary’s now-gray dress was once a glowing purple, as Laurence Kanter notes) were staples at Florentine ceremonies. The painting features a daring asymmetry—the space behind Joseph is much more crowded and busier than the comparatively vacant space occupied by Mary’s calm handmaidens—and at least one tantalizing puzzle: of the four doors that line the room, the one to Mary’s right is slightly ajar. Perhaps it’s out of carelessness, or perhaps it’s a sign of the opening into a new life for Mary and her husband— and for all future Christians. But Botticini seems to make this moment more solemn than festive, judging from Joseph's concentrated expression and Mary's modest demeanor as she shuts her eyes. (The jilted male suitors, two of whom are seen breaking their rods, would no doubt describe the occasion differently.)
这期杂志以一场佛罗伦萨的婚礼和对其神秘主人的猜测(朱迪思·布莱斯的《解码代号16》)开篇。贝伦森的藏品中有几幅与婚礼有关的作品,但其中最吸引我的是号手、腼腆的少女、沮丧的追求者和一位面容憔悴的未婚夫:弗朗西斯科·波提西尼的《新娘》(Sposalizio della Vergine)(图1)。更重要的是,这幅画是为奥尔特拉诺广场上佛罗伦萨圣菲利斯的一座教堂画的,比布莱斯讨论的婚礼早了大约五年。尽管在1918年伯纳德·贝伦森认为他最近购买的画板是秘鲁画家乔瓦尼·博卡蒂的作品,但他引用了早先的论点,认为它是弗拉·安杰利科的作品,因为“太多……这幅画暗示了弗洛伦斯。”波提西尼的《圣母的婚礼》可能确实让人想起了佛罗伦萨的婚礼和场所,这并不仅仅是因为波提西尼是佛罗伦萨人。这七根柱子可能指向圣马可图书馆,该图书馆由米凯洛佐(Michelozzo)设计,这座教堂文艺复兴时期的立面也是由米凯洛佐设计的,波提西尼的作品曾存放在那里。号手们一身红色,是婚礼上色彩最鲜艳的成员(尽管正如劳伦斯·坎特(Laurence Kanter)所写,玛丽现在穿的灰色礼服曾经是闪闪发光的紫色),他们是佛罗伦萨仪式上的主要人物。这幅画的特点是大胆的不对称——约瑟夫身后的空间比玛丽平静的女仆们占据的相对空旷的空间要拥挤和繁忙得多——至少有一个诱人的谜题:房间里有四扇门,玛丽右边的那扇门微微半掩着。也许这是粗心大意,也许这是玛丽和她丈夫——以及所有未来的基督徒——开始新生活的标志。但波提西尼似乎使这一刻更加庄严而不是节日,从约瑟夫集中的表情和玛丽闭上眼睛时的谦虚举止来判断。(被抛弃的男性追求者,其中两人被看到折断了他们的棍棒,毫无疑问,他们会以不同的方式描述这个场合。)