Evaluation of online learning in Natural Science for junior high school

Nurrana Fitria Luthfi, S. Hamdi
{"title":"Evaluation of online learning in Natural Science for junior high school","authors":"Nurrana Fitria Luthfi, S. Hamdi","doi":"10.21831/pep.v24i2.35015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the online learning system for natural science subjects at the junior high school level (Sekolah Menengah Pertama) in Yogyakarta. using the CIPP (Contex, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The research subjects included 2 school principals, 5 biology teachers and 267 grade VII, VIII, and IX students at SMP N 9 Yogyakarta and MTs Nurul Ummah Kotagede Yogyakarta. Data is collected through interviews and questionnaires to prove validity using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the reliability of the instrument was analyzed using Alpha Cronbach in the good category, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study on the context aspect in the form of school online program objectives to meet the needs of flexibility, ideal operational technology tools, and professionalism of science teachers in practicum activities in a fairly good category; the input aspect of the online application system, support for internet access infrastructure, scheduling and procedures and the capabilities of science teachers are in the good category; the process aspect in the form of online learning online is in the good category; and product aspects of quality achievement on learning outcomes and supporting the implementation of the online learning system fall into the good category.","PeriodicalId":33364,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.35015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the online learning system for natural science subjects at the junior high school level (Sekolah Menengah Pertama) in Yogyakarta. using the CIPP (Contex, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The research subjects included 2 school principals, 5 biology teachers and 267 grade VII, VIII, and IX students at SMP N 9 Yogyakarta and MTs Nurul Ummah Kotagede Yogyakarta. Data is collected through interviews and questionnaires to prove validity using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the reliability of the instrument was analyzed using Alpha Cronbach in the good category, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study on the context aspect in the form of school online program objectives to meet the needs of flexibility, ideal operational technology tools, and professionalism of science teachers in practicum activities in a fairly good category; the input aspect of the online application system, support for internet access infrastructure, scheduling and procedures and the capabilities of science teachers are in the good category; the process aspect in the form of online learning online is in the good category; and product aspects of quality achievement on learning outcomes and supporting the implementation of the online learning system fall into the good category.
初中自然科学在线学习的评价
摘要本研究旨在评估日惹市初中自然科学课程在线学习系统。使用CIPP(上下文、输入、过程、产品)评估模型。研究对象包括2名校长、5名生物教师和267名七、八、九年级的学生,他们分别来自日惹SMP n9和MTs Nurul Ummah Kotagede。通过访谈和问卷收集数据,采用探索性因素分析(EFA)证明效度,使用Alpha Cronbach在良好类别中分析仪器的可靠性,并进行定性描述性分析。本研究结果在情境方面体现了学校在线课程目标的灵活性、理想的操作技术工具、以及科学教师在实践活动类别中的专业性等方面的较好表现;在线申请系统的输入方面,对互联网接入基础设施的支持,调度和程序以及科学教师的能力都处于良好的类别;在线学习形式中的过程方面属于好的范畴;而产品方面的质量成就对学习成果的影响以及支持在线学习系统的实施都属于良好的范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信