{"title":"Planet of the Apes","authors":"De Witt Douglas Kilgore","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planet of the Apes, directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, was released in April 1968 and became an unexpected commercial success with modest critical support. That success inspired four sequels, two television series, comic books, toys, video games, and other merchandise. Thus it inspired the almost organic evolution of producing and exploiting popular film in a new way: the cultural business model we now call the franchise. The Apes franchise advanced into the 21st century with a 2001 remake of the first film by Tim Burton, succeeded by a reboot trilogy that has benefited from advances in performance capture acting: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (directed by Rupert Wyatt, 2011), Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (directed by Matt Reeves, 2014), and War for the Planet of the Apes (directed by Matt Reeves, 2017). The source of the inaugural film is Pierre Boulle’s novel La Planéte des singes, a satire that tests the pretensions of Western (as human) civilization against the achievements of a futuristic society of intelligent apes. The motion picture reshapes Boulle’s scenario into an allegory for the sociopolitical concerns of 1960s America. Issues such as civil rights, racial conflict, cold war militarism, women’s roles, and the generation gap all have a place in its estranged diegesis. Planet of the Apes follows Taylor (Charlton Heston), an astronaut who lands on a planet that flips the order between human beings and sentient apes. He becomes a caged beast, denied the dignity of membership in a dominant species. Escaping captivity, he is shocked to find a half-buried Statue of Liberty. He is not on some distant planet but in the future of his own world. Written by Michael Wilson and Rod Serling, this fantastic adventure continues to engage cultural critics as a grim allegory of the inevitable wages of racial conflict. Its persistence in American culture seems due to the nation’s irresolution about race, white male identity, and national destiny. What began as a modest exercise in French colonial critique (Boulle) is now a global cinematic phenomenon that forecasts the end of human (as white, Western, and male) primacy and its displacement by either another mode of being or universal destruction.","PeriodicalId":41388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","volume":"88 23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Planet of the Apes, directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, was released in April 1968 and became an unexpected commercial success with modest critical support. That success inspired four sequels, two television series, comic books, toys, video games, and other merchandise. Thus it inspired the almost organic evolution of producing and exploiting popular film in a new way: the cultural business model we now call the franchise. The Apes franchise advanced into the 21st century with a 2001 remake of the first film by Tim Burton, succeeded by a reboot trilogy that has benefited from advances in performance capture acting: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (directed by Rupert Wyatt, 2011), Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (directed by Matt Reeves, 2014), and War for the Planet of the Apes (directed by Matt Reeves, 2017). The source of the inaugural film is Pierre Boulle’s novel La Planéte des singes, a satire that tests the pretensions of Western (as human) civilization against the achievements of a futuristic society of intelligent apes. The motion picture reshapes Boulle’s scenario into an allegory for the sociopolitical concerns of 1960s America. Issues such as civil rights, racial conflict, cold war militarism, women’s roles, and the generation gap all have a place in its estranged diegesis. Planet of the Apes follows Taylor (Charlton Heston), an astronaut who lands on a planet that flips the order between human beings and sentient apes. He becomes a caged beast, denied the dignity of membership in a dominant species. Escaping captivity, he is shocked to find a half-buried Statue of Liberty. He is not on some distant planet but in the future of his own world. Written by Michael Wilson and Rod Serling, this fantastic adventure continues to engage cultural critics as a grim allegory of the inevitable wages of racial conflict. Its persistence in American culture seems due to the nation’s irresolution about race, white male identity, and national destiny. What began as a modest exercise in French colonial critique (Boulle) is now a global cinematic phenomenon that forecasts the end of human (as white, Western, and male) primacy and its displacement by either another mode of being or universal destruction.
由富兰克林·j·沙夫纳(Franklin J. Schaffner)执导的《人猿星球》于1968年4月上映,在口碑不佳的情况下取得了意想不到的商业成功。这一成功激发了四部续集、两部电视剧、漫画书、玩具、视频游戏和其他商品的灵感。因此,它激发了以一种新的方式制作和开发流行电影的几乎有机进化:我们现在称之为特许经营的文化商业模式。2001年,蒂姆·伯顿翻拍了《猩球崛起》第一部,《猩球崛起》系列电影进入21世纪,随后又推出了得益于表演捕捉技术进步的三部曲:《猩球崛起》(鲁伯特·怀亚特执导,2011年)、《猩球崛起:黎明》(马特·里夫斯执导,2014年)和《猩球崛起:终极之战》(马特·里夫斯执导,2017年)。这部电影的起源是皮埃尔·布勒(Pierre Boulle)的小说《生命的计划》(La plan des singes),这是一部讽刺小说,它考验了西方文明(作为人类)的虚饰与未来智能猿社会的成就。这部电影将Boulle的场景重塑为20世纪60年代美国社会政治问题的寓言。民权、种族冲突、冷战军国主义、女性角色和代沟等问题都在这本疏远的传记中占有一席之地。《人猿星球》讲述的是宇航员泰勒(查尔顿·赫斯顿饰)降落在一个星球上的故事,这个星球颠覆了人类和有知觉的猿类之间的秩序。他变成了一只被关在笼子里的野兽,被剥夺了作为优势物种成员的尊严。从囚禁中逃脱后,他惊讶地发现了一座半埋的自由女神像。他不是在某个遥远的星球上,而是在他自己世界的未来。由迈克尔·威尔逊(Michael Wilson)和罗德·塞林(Rod Serling)撰写的这部奇妙的冒险小说,作为种族冲突不可避免的后果的残酷寓言,继续吸引着文化评论家。它在美国文化中的持续存在似乎是由于这个国家对种族、白人男性身份和国家命运的犹豫不决。最初作为法国殖民批判(Boulle)的一种适度的尝试,现在是一种全球电影现象,它预测了人类(作为白人、西方人和男性)首要地位的终结,以及它被另一种存在模式或普遍毁灭所取代。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies is an English-language forum for theoretical, methodological and critical debate on Italian film and media production, reception and consumption. It provides a platform for dialogue between academics, filmmakers, cinema and media professionals. This peer-reviewed journal invites submissions of scholarly articles relating to the artistic features, cultural themes, international influence and history of Italian film and media. Furthermore, the journal intends to revive a critical discussion on the auteurs, revisit the historiography of Italian cinema and celebrate the dynamic role played by new directors. The journal includes a book and film review section as well as notes on Italian film festivals abroad and international conference reports. The profound transformation undergone by the rapidly expanding media environment under the impact of digital technology, has lead scholars in the field of media studies to elaborate new theoretical paradigms and methodological approaches to account for the complexities of a changing landscape of convergence and hybridization. The boundaries between cinema and media as art forms and fields of inquiry are increasingly hybridized too. Taking into account this evolving scenario, the JICMS provides an international arena for critical engagement with a wider range of issues related to the current media environment. The journal welcomes in particular contributions that discuss any aspects of Italian media production, distribution and consumption within national and transnational, social, political, economic and historical contexts.