The Relationship between Commit Message Detail and Defect Proneness in Java Projects on GitHub

Jacob G. Barnett, Charles K. Gathuru, Luke S. Soldano, Shane McIntosh
{"title":"The Relationship between Commit Message Detail and Defect Proneness in Java Projects on GitHub","authors":"Jacob G. Barnett, Charles K. Gathuru, Luke S. Soldano, Shane McIntosh","doi":"10.1145/2901739.2903496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction models aim to predict the commits that will introduce defects in the future. Traditionally, JIT defect prediction models are trained using metrics that are primarily derived from aspects of the code change itself (e.g., the size of the change, the author’s prior experience). In addition to the code that is submitted during a commit, authors write commit messages, which describe the commit for archival purposes. It is our position that the level of detail in these commit messages can provide additional explanatory power to JIT defect prediction models. Hence, in this paper, we analyze the relationship between the defect proneness of commits and commit message volume (i.e., the length of the commit message) and commit message content (approximated using spam filtering technology). Through analysis of JIT models that were trained using 342 GitHub repositories, we find that our JIT models outperform random guessing models, achieving AUC and Brier scores that range between 0.63-0.96 and 0.01-0.21, respectively. Furthermore, our metrics that are derived from commit message detail provide a statistically significant boost to the explanatory power to the JIT models in 43%-80% of the studied systems, accounting for up to 72% of the explanatory power. Future JIT studies should consider adding commit message detail metrics.","PeriodicalId":6621,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"120 1","pages":"496-499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2903496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction models aim to predict the commits that will introduce defects in the future. Traditionally, JIT defect prediction models are trained using metrics that are primarily derived from aspects of the code change itself (e.g., the size of the change, the author’s prior experience). In addition to the code that is submitted during a commit, authors write commit messages, which describe the commit for archival purposes. It is our position that the level of detail in these commit messages can provide additional explanatory power to JIT defect prediction models. Hence, in this paper, we analyze the relationship between the defect proneness of commits and commit message volume (i.e., the length of the commit message) and commit message content (approximated using spam filtering technology). Through analysis of JIT models that were trained using 342 GitHub repositories, we find that our JIT models outperform random guessing models, achieving AUC and Brier scores that range between 0.63-0.96 and 0.01-0.21, respectively. Furthermore, our metrics that are derived from commit message detail provide a statistically significant boost to the explanatory power to the JIT models in 43%-80% of the studied systems, accounting for up to 72% of the explanatory power. Future JIT studies should consider adding commit message detail metrics.
GitHub上Java项目中提交消息细节与缺陷倾向的关系
即时(JIT)缺陷预测模型旨在预测将来会引入缺陷的提交。传统上,JIT缺陷预测模型是使用主要来源于代码变更本身方面的度量来训练的(例如,变更的大小,作者先前的经验)。除了在提交过程中提交的代码之外,作者还编写提交消息,这些消息描述了用于存档的提交。我们的立场是,这些提交消息中的细节级别可以为JIT缺陷预测模型提供额外的解释力。因此,在本文中,我们分析了提交的缺陷倾向与提交消息数量(即提交消息的长度)和提交消息内容(使用垃圾邮件过滤技术近似)之间的关系。通过对使用342个GitHub存储库训练的JIT模型的分析,我们发现我们的JIT模型优于随机猜测模型,AUC和Brier得分分别在0.63-0.96和0.01-0.21之间。此外,我们从提交消息细节中导出的指标在统计上显著地提高了43%-80%所研究系统中JIT模型的解释能力,占解释能力的72%。未来的JIT研究应该考虑添加提交消息细节指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信