Health Services Research, Medicare, and Medicaid: A Deep Bow and a Rechartered Agenda.

D. Berwick
{"title":"Health Services Research, Medicare, and Medicaid: A Deep Bow and a Rechartered Agenda.","authors":"D. Berwick","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F rom their inception, Medicare and Medicaid have been shaped and guided by health services research (HSR) and its people. The linkages are numerous: ideas (like Diagnostic Related Groups, or DRGs, Resource-Based Relative Value Scale, or RBRVS, and Accountable Care Organizations, or ACOs), tools (like those from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, the Medical Outcome Study, and the HCAHPS family), frameworks, and, of course, people who oscillated between academia and government, to the benefit of both. As administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from 2010 to 2011, I saw productive contributions of HSR to CMS policy, regulation, and operations every day. That is a track record to be proud of. But there are gaps, some big ones, and a rechartered agenda for HSR could help boost American health care to its next and needed levels of performance. The following are 10 suggested topics for HSR to focus on in the next decade, more understanding of which would help health care leaders, including CMS, to move more rapidly toward better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower per capita cost through improvement: the “Triple Aim.”1,2","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"88 13 1","pages":"659-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

F rom their inception, Medicare and Medicaid have been shaped and guided by health services research (HSR) and its people. The linkages are numerous: ideas (like Diagnostic Related Groups, or DRGs, Resource-Based Relative Value Scale, or RBRVS, and Accountable Care Organizations, or ACOs), tools (like those from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, the Medical Outcome Study, and the HCAHPS family), frameworks, and, of course, people who oscillated between academia and government, to the benefit of both. As administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from 2010 to 2011, I saw productive contributions of HSR to CMS policy, regulation, and operations every day. That is a track record to be proud of. But there are gaps, some big ones, and a rechartered agenda for HSR could help boost American health care to its next and needed levels of performance. The following are 10 suggested topics for HSR to focus on in the next decade, more understanding of which would help health care leaders, including CMS, to move more rapidly toward better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower per capita cost through improvement: the “Triple Aim.”1,2
医疗服务研究、医疗保险和医疗补助:深鞠躬和重新安排议程。
从一开始,医疗保险和医疗补助就受到卫生服务研究(HSR)及其人员的影响和指导。联系是很多的:想法(如诊断相关组,或DRGs,基于资源的相对价值量表,或RBRVS,和负责任的医疗组织,或ACOs),工具(如来自兰德健康保险实验,医疗结果研究和HCAHPS家庭的工具),框架,当然,在学术界和政府之间摇摆的人,为了双方的利益。在2010年至2011年担任医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的管理员期间,我每天都看到高铁对CMS的政策、法规和运营做出了卓有成效的贡献。这是一个值得骄傲的记录。但是差距还是存在的,有些差距很大,重新制定高铁议程可以帮助美国医疗保健达到下一个和需要的水平。以下是高铁在未来十年关注的10个建议主题,更多地了解这些主题将有助于医疗保健领导者,包括CMS,通过改进更快地向更好的个人护理,更好的人群健康和更低的人均成本迈进:“三重目标”1,2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信