Introduction to Special Section: Detroit

N. Tobier
{"title":"Introduction to Special Section: Detroit","authors":"N. Tobier","doi":"10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special section on Detroit is about the roles large cities play in university servicelearning pedagogies and campuscommunity engagement. The University of Michigan’s three campuses sit anywhere from 5 to 75 miles from the City of Detroit today – but the founding location of the University in 1817 was in the City itself. In the intervening two centuries, the ways we think about and engage in projects with the City of Detroit has run the spectrum from intertwined to separate. over the past decade, narratives of Detroit in scholarly research and the media have ranged from the fate of the shrinking city through the drama of bankruptcy to the rising crisis of gentrification. This is reminiscent of the cultural climate of the 1970s, particularly in the United States, when academics experienced a series of radical shifts in approaches to research, practice, and relationships that reflected Detroit’s evolving presence within the region, the state, and the country. Decades later, in the midst of very different cultural, economic, and technological circumstances, and on the 50 anniversary of the Detroit rebellion, we ask how have approaches to communityengaged practice and research themselves adapted? Rhetorical shifts away from ‘community growth’ toward a proliferation of ‘creative innovation’ are occurring in academia and in urban policy. Creative and experimental modes of development have become absorbed into normative, marketdriven systems with an increasing emphasis on the value of the brand of “Detroit.” These processes may be instrumental in spurring the growth of the City, but they often occur at the expense of social values, inclusivity, and public engagement. The development of a wide variety of frameworks for university and communitybased educational and research efforts has responded to the increasing neoliberalization of Detroit on the one hand and renewed interest in radical collaborative models on the other. Social and economic developments, driven by market logic and declines in municipal funding for making, thinking, learning, and doing, occur sidebyside with ambitious grassroots projects emphasizing the social values of cocreation and social justice. What are the critical questions that need to be asked in order to promote authentic and meaningful engagement with the City today, in this rapidly evolving context? We invited proposals for Detroitfocused articles from academics, artists, educators, and researchers that comment on, propose, and reflect programs and approaches to research and practice and their relation to historical and contemporary models. By offering examples and analysis of what is happening now, we hope that the following provides some critical perspectives on this emerging work with a focus on preparing student, faculty, and community partners for authentic engagement. By building on the foundations of social justice, creativity, imagination, and experiment, we advocate for the consideration of Detroit as a point of comparison for campuscommunity engagement practice, education, and research in other cities. In these examples, rooted in experiential modes of thinking, learning, and doing, we see engagements oriented toward current and future cultural and social conditions that can be integrated into developing modes of education and research.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special section on Detroit is about the roles large cities play in university servicelearning pedagogies and campuscommunity engagement. The University of Michigan’s three campuses sit anywhere from 5 to 75 miles from the City of Detroit today – but the founding location of the University in 1817 was in the City itself. In the intervening two centuries, the ways we think about and engage in projects with the City of Detroit has run the spectrum from intertwined to separate. over the past decade, narratives of Detroit in scholarly research and the media have ranged from the fate of the shrinking city through the drama of bankruptcy to the rising crisis of gentrification. This is reminiscent of the cultural climate of the 1970s, particularly in the United States, when academics experienced a series of radical shifts in approaches to research, practice, and relationships that reflected Detroit’s evolving presence within the region, the state, and the country. Decades later, in the midst of very different cultural, economic, and technological circumstances, and on the 50 anniversary of the Detroit rebellion, we ask how have approaches to communityengaged practice and research themselves adapted? Rhetorical shifts away from ‘community growth’ toward a proliferation of ‘creative innovation’ are occurring in academia and in urban policy. Creative and experimental modes of development have become absorbed into normative, marketdriven systems with an increasing emphasis on the value of the brand of “Detroit.” These processes may be instrumental in spurring the growth of the City, but they often occur at the expense of social values, inclusivity, and public engagement. The development of a wide variety of frameworks for university and communitybased educational and research efforts has responded to the increasing neoliberalization of Detroit on the one hand and renewed interest in radical collaborative models on the other. Social and economic developments, driven by market logic and declines in municipal funding for making, thinking, learning, and doing, occur sidebyside with ambitious grassroots projects emphasizing the social values of cocreation and social justice. What are the critical questions that need to be asked in order to promote authentic and meaningful engagement with the City today, in this rapidly evolving context? We invited proposals for Detroitfocused articles from academics, artists, educators, and researchers that comment on, propose, and reflect programs and approaches to research and practice and their relation to historical and contemporary models. By offering examples and analysis of what is happening now, we hope that the following provides some critical perspectives on this emerging work with a focus on preparing student, faculty, and community partners for authentic engagement. By building on the foundations of social justice, creativity, imagination, and experiment, we advocate for the consideration of Detroit as a point of comparison for campuscommunity engagement practice, education, and research in other cities. In these examples, rooted in experiential modes of thinking, learning, and doing, we see engagements oriented toward current and future cultural and social conditions that can be integrated into developing modes of education and research.
专题介绍:底特律
这个关于底特律的特别部分是关于大城市在大学服务、学习教学法和校园社区参与方面所扮演的角色。密歇根大学的三个校区距离今天的底特律市5到75英里不等,但1817年密歇根大学的建校地点就在底特律市。在这中间的两个世纪里,我们思考和参与底特律市项目的方式从交织到分离。在过去的十年里,学术研究和媒体对底特律的描述五花八门,从这个萎缩城市的命运,到破产的戏剧性事件,再到日益严重的中产阶级化危机。这让人想起20世纪70年代的文化氛围,尤其是在美国,当时学术界在研究、实践和关系方面经历了一系列激进的转变,反映了底特律在该地区、州和国家中不断发展的存在。几十年后,在不同的文化、经济和技术环境中,在底特律叛乱50周年之际,我们问,社区参与实践和研究的方法是如何适应的?学术界和城市政策中出现了从“社区增长”向“创造性创新”扩散的修辞转变。创造性和实验性的发展模式已被纳入规范的、市场驱动的体系,并日益强调“底特律”这个品牌的价值。这些过程可能有助于促进城市的发展,但它们往往以牺牲社会价值观、包容性和公众参与为代价。大学和社区为基础的教育和研究努力开发了各种各样的框架,一方面回应了底特律日益增长的新自由主义化,另一方面对激进的合作模式重新产生了兴趣。在市场逻辑的驱动下,社会和经济的发展,以及用于制造、思考、学习和行动的市政资金的减少,与强调共同创造和社会正义的社会价值的雄心勃勃的基层项目同时发生。在这种快速发展的背景下,为了促进与伦敦金融城进行真实而有意义的接触,需要提出哪些关键问题?我们邀请学者、艺术家、教育工作者和研究人员对底特律的文章进行评论、建议和反映研究和实践的项目和方法,以及它们与历史和当代模式的关系。通过举例和分析目前正在发生的事情,我们希望以下内容能够为这一新兴工作提供一些批判性的观点,重点是让学生、教师和社区合作伙伴为真正的参与做好准备。通过建立在社会正义、创造力、想象力和实验的基础上,我们提倡将底特律作为其他城市校园社区参与实践、教育和研究的一个比较点。在这些根植于经验思维、学习和行动模式的例子中,我们看到了面向当前和未来文化和社会条件的参与,这些参与可以整合到发展中的教育和研究模式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信