Nuclear Dry Cask Storage Container CFD Model Experimental Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

Kimbal Hall, A. Zigh, J. Solı́s
{"title":"Nuclear Dry Cask Storage Container CFD Model Experimental Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","authors":"Kimbal Hall, A. Zigh, J. Solı́s","doi":"10.1115/vvs2019-5142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n CFD is a valuable tool for showing compliance with peak temperatures in dry cask storage systems (DCSS). When demonstrating compliance, it is valuable to quantify the uncertainty in the simulation result as a function of the computational mesh and simulation inputs. USNRC was a participant in a CFD validation test using the TN-32B cask, with extensive temperature measurements throughout the DCSS, including measurements on the cask surface and in fuel bundles.\n This paper discusses validation and uncertainty quantification of a CFD model using experimental data. Uncertainty quantification follows the procedures outlined in ASME V&V20-2009 [1]. Sources of uncertainty that were examined in the analysis include iterative uncertainty, spacial discretization, and uncertainty due to approximately twenty input parameters. Input parameters investigated include environmental conditions, material properties, decay heat, and the spacing of the many small gaps in the installation. The uncertainty in gap size was found to be a particularly large source of uncertainty in this particular installation.\n Results of a “base case” using the conservative estimates outlined in the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) [2] are presented, as well as a “best estimate case” that uses more realistic values. These results are compared to experimentally measured values, which fall within the uncertainty band of the analysis. This work is also the subject of an upcoming NUREG/CR.","PeriodicalId":87343,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ASME Verification and Validation Symposium -2019- : VVS2019 : presented at ASME 2019 Verification and Validation Symposium, May 15-17, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. ASME Verification and Validation Symposium (2019 : L...","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ASME Verification and Validation Symposium -2019- : VVS2019 : presented at ASME 2019 Verification and Validation Symposium, May 15-17, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. ASME Verification and Validation Symposium (2019 : L...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/vvs2019-5142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CFD is a valuable tool for showing compliance with peak temperatures in dry cask storage systems (DCSS). When demonstrating compliance, it is valuable to quantify the uncertainty in the simulation result as a function of the computational mesh and simulation inputs. USNRC was a participant in a CFD validation test using the TN-32B cask, with extensive temperature measurements throughout the DCSS, including measurements on the cask surface and in fuel bundles. This paper discusses validation and uncertainty quantification of a CFD model using experimental data. Uncertainty quantification follows the procedures outlined in ASME V&V20-2009 [1]. Sources of uncertainty that were examined in the analysis include iterative uncertainty, spacial discretization, and uncertainty due to approximately twenty input parameters. Input parameters investigated include environmental conditions, material properties, decay heat, and the spacing of the many small gaps in the installation. The uncertainty in gap size was found to be a particularly large source of uncertainty in this particular installation. Results of a “base case” using the conservative estimates outlined in the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) [2] are presented, as well as a “best estimate case” that uses more realistic values. These results are compared to experimentally measured values, which fall within the uncertainty band of the analysis. This work is also the subject of an upcoming NUREG/CR.
核干桶贮存容器CFD模型实验验证及不确定度量化
CFD是一种有价值的工具,可以显示干桶存储系统(DCSS)中峰值温度的符合性。在演示顺应性时,将仿真结果中的不确定性作为计算网格和仿真输入的函数进行量化是有价值的。USNRC使用TN-32B桶参与了CFD验证测试,在整个dcs中进行了广泛的温度测量,包括桶表面和燃料束的温度测量。本文用实验数据讨论了CFD模型的验证和不确定度的量化。不确定度量化遵循ASME V&V20-2009[1]中概述的程序。在分析中检查的不确定性来源包括迭代不确定性、空间离散化和由于大约20个输入参数引起的不确定性。研究的输入参数包括环境条件、材料特性、衰减热以及安装中许多小间隙的间距。在这种特殊的安装中,发现间隙尺寸的不确定性是一个特别大的不确定性来源。本文给出了使用最新的最终安全分析报告(UFSAR)[2]中概述的保守估计的“基本情况”的结果,以及使用更现实值的“最佳估计情况”的结果。这些结果与实验测量值进行了比较,实验测量值落在分析的不确定范围内。这项工作也是即将到来的NUREG/CR的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书