When impairment impairs: a reply to ‘Fairness, generosity and conditionality in the welfare system: the case of UK disability benefits’ by Johnson and Nettle

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Global Discourse Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1332/204378921x16364800477981

T. Shakespeare

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provides a response to Johnson and Nettle’s paper, discussing justifications for the UK welfare state, and associated perceptions of disability and fairness. Rather than the ‘stick’ of sanctions and conditionality, more investment is required in return to work efforts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

当损害损害:对“福利制度中的公平、慷慨和条件限制:英国残疾福利的案例”的回复，约翰逊和内特尔

对Johnson和Nettle的论文进行了回应，讨论了英国福利国家的理由，以及对残疾和公平的相关看法。而不是制裁和条件限制的“大棒”，需要更多的投资来回报工作努力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Global Discourse Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Discourse is an interdisciplinary, problem-oriented journal of applied contemporary thought operating at the intersection of politics, international relations, sociology and social policy. The journal’s scope is broad, encouraging interrogation of current affairs with regard to core questions of distributive justice, wellbeing, cultural diversity, autonomy, sovereignty, security and recognition. All issues are themed and aimed at addressing pressing issues as they emerge.