Mobile health may improve evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms

C. Gomes, J. Moromizato, Lucia S Ribeiro
{"title":"Mobile health may improve evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms","authors":"C. Gomes, J. Moromizato, Lucia S Ribeiro","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0211.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is primarily based on clinical history and physical examination. Measuring the frequency and severity of LUTS adds important information for the characterization and management of lower urinary tract disorders (1, 2). Bladder diaries and uroflowmetry may be invaluable for symptom characterization. The recording of volume and time of each void by the patient is referred to as a frequency volume chart (FVC). Inclusion of information like fluid intake, use of pads, incontinence episodes or symptom severity is termed a bladder diary (1). The FVC provides data on total voided volume, day-time and night-time voiding frequency, nocturnal urinary volume and individual voided volumes. The maximum voided volume (MVV) is an important parameter of the voiding diary as it corresponds to the functional bladder capacity. It may be important to improve our understanding of bladder sensation, overactive bladder symptoms, polyuria and overflow incontinence (3). It may be used to clinically phenotype patients and help counseling regarding fluid intake and timed voiding (3). It may also assist in monitoring patient ́s response to treatment (2). The amount of information to be included and the duration of a bladder diary is variable, but typically should take from three to seven days (4). In this study, based on the perception that patients often have a greater MVV during office uroflowmetry than that seen in the bladder diary, the authors compared these two non-invasive methods by which MVV can be determined. They used a database of over seven hundred patients evaluated for LUTS who completed a 24-hour bladder diary independently using a smartphone application. They found that there is a difference between the two measurement tools, and that the maximum voided volume recorded in a bladder diary (BD-MVV) is usually greater than that obtained at the time of uroflow (Q-MVV). They suggested that for a more reliable assessment of MVV in men and women, both Q-MVV and BD-MVV should be assessed and that the larger of the two values is a more reliable assessment of MVV (5). It is important to highlight the use of a mobile app for the completion of the voiding diary in this study. Mobile health (mHealth) is an attractive and expanding tendency within LUTS care, both from the viewpoint of urologists and also by health systems and for research (6, 7). Typically, mHealth is based on a smartphone app that may help in the evaluation, monitoring and/or treatment of a health condition. mHealth has been used in urology for prostate cancer, urinary stones, LUTS, urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections and its use has gained importance with the COVID-19 pandemic (8). In the urinary stone field, apps may prevent forgetting a double-J catheter (9). For prostate cancer, apps may help physicians to stage patients and calculate disease risk and they EDITORIAL COMMENT Vol. 47 (6): 1195-1197, November December, 2021","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"65 1","pages":"1195 - 1197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0211.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is primarily based on clinical history and physical examination. Measuring the frequency and severity of LUTS adds important information for the characterization and management of lower urinary tract disorders (1, 2). Bladder diaries and uroflowmetry may be invaluable for symptom characterization. The recording of volume and time of each void by the patient is referred to as a frequency volume chart (FVC). Inclusion of information like fluid intake, use of pads, incontinence episodes or symptom severity is termed a bladder diary (1). The FVC provides data on total voided volume, day-time and night-time voiding frequency, nocturnal urinary volume and individual voided volumes. The maximum voided volume (MVV) is an important parameter of the voiding diary as it corresponds to the functional bladder capacity. It may be important to improve our understanding of bladder sensation, overactive bladder symptoms, polyuria and overflow incontinence (3). It may be used to clinically phenotype patients and help counseling regarding fluid intake and timed voiding (3). It may also assist in monitoring patient ́s response to treatment (2). The amount of information to be included and the duration of a bladder diary is variable, but typically should take from three to seven days (4). In this study, based on the perception that patients often have a greater MVV during office uroflowmetry than that seen in the bladder diary, the authors compared these two non-invasive methods by which MVV can be determined. They used a database of over seven hundred patients evaluated for LUTS who completed a 24-hour bladder diary independently using a smartphone application. They found that there is a difference between the two measurement tools, and that the maximum voided volume recorded in a bladder diary (BD-MVV) is usually greater than that obtained at the time of uroflow (Q-MVV). They suggested that for a more reliable assessment of MVV in men and women, both Q-MVV and BD-MVV should be assessed and that the larger of the two values is a more reliable assessment of MVV (5). It is important to highlight the use of a mobile app for the completion of the voiding diary in this study. Mobile health (mHealth) is an attractive and expanding tendency within LUTS care, both from the viewpoint of urologists and also by health systems and for research (6, 7). Typically, mHealth is based on a smartphone app that may help in the evaluation, monitoring and/or treatment of a health condition. mHealth has been used in urology for prostate cancer, urinary stones, LUTS, urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections and its use has gained importance with the COVID-19 pandemic (8). In the urinary stone field, apps may prevent forgetting a double-J catheter (9). For prostate cancer, apps may help physicians to stage patients and calculate disease risk and they EDITORIAL COMMENT Vol. 47 (6): 1195-1197, November December, 2021
移动医疗可改善对下尿路症状的评估
下尿路症状(LUTS)患者的评估主要基于临床病史和体格检查。测量LUTS的频率和严重程度为下尿路疾病的表征和治疗提供了重要的信息(1,2)。膀胱日记和尿流测量对于症状表征可能是非常宝贵的。患者记录每个空洞的体积和时间称为频率体积图(FVC)。膀胱日记包括液体摄入量、尿垫使用情况、尿失禁发作或症状严重程度等信息(1)。膀胱日记提供总排尿量、白天和夜间排尿频率、夜间排尿量和个人排尿量等数据。最大排尿量(MVV)是排尿日记的一个重要参数,因为它对应于膀胱功能容量。提高我们对膀胱感觉、膀胱过度活跃症状、多尿和溢尿失禁的理解可能很重要(3)。它可以用于临床表型患者,并帮助咨询有关液体摄入和定时排尿(3)。它也可以帮助监测患者对治疗的反应(2)。要包括的信息量和膀胱日记的持续时间是可变的,但通常应该从3到7天(4)。在这项研究中,基于患者在办公室尿流测量中通常比膀胱日记中看到的MVV更大的认知,作者比较了这两种可以确定MVV的非侵入性方法。他们使用了一个数据库,该数据库包含了700多名LUTS患者,这些患者使用智能手机应用程序独立完成了24小时膀胱日记。他们发现两种测量工具之间存在差异,膀胱日记(BD-MVV)中记录的最大空气量通常大于尿流(Q-MVV)时获得的空气量。他们建议,为了更可靠地评估男性和女性的MVV,应该同时评估Q-MVV和BD-MVV,并且两个值中较大的值对MVV的评估更可靠(5)。在本研究中,重要的是要强调使用移动应用程序来完成排尿日记。从泌尿科医生、卫生系统和研究的角度来看,移动医疗(mHealth)是LUTS护理中一个有吸引力和不断扩大的趋势(6,7)。通常,移动医疗是基于智能手机应用程序,可以帮助评估、监测和/或治疗健康状况。移动健康已经在泌尿外科中用于前列腺癌、尿路结石、LUTS、尿失禁和尿路感染,随着COVID-19大流行,它的使用变得越来越重要(8)。在尿路结石领域,应用程序可以防止忘记双j导管(9)。对于前列腺癌,应用程序可以帮助医生对患者进行分期并计算疾病风险,他们EDITORIAL COMMENT Vol. 47 (6): 1195-1197, November December, 2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信