The Surgical Outcome for Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Based on Visual Analog Scores

Tanweer Ahmed, Lal Rehman, Rabail Akbar, Farrukh Javeed, Sana Akbar, Raheel Gohar
{"title":"The Surgical Outcome for Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Based on Visual Analog Scores","authors":"Tanweer Ahmed, Lal Rehman, Rabail Akbar, Farrukh Javeed, Sana Akbar, Raheel Gohar","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i3.783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  To determine the surgical Outcome for a prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc based on a visual analog score. \nMaterials and Methods:  A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Questionnaires were used to collect demographic data, presenting symptoms, and the level of the herniated discs. The patients underwent different surgical interventions and then these patients were followed for 2 weeks postoperatively and the surgical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). \nResults:  A total of 34 (61.8%) males and 21 (38.2%) females were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 36.14 ± 9.30 years. L5/S1 was the most commonly affected level. Laminar fenestration was the most common surgical procedure done in 23 (41.8%) patients followed by hemilaminectomy in 19 (34.5%) patients and bilateral laminectomy in 13 (23.6%). Post-operative pain was relieved in the majority of patients which is 43 (78.2%). \nConclusion:  Medical management remains the mainstay in the majority of patients having lumbar disc prolapse. However, in cases where the pain is refractory to conservative management, surgery is considered after careful patient selection. It was seen that surgical intervention successfully reduced the intensity of pain and resulted in a symptomatically improved patient. Hence it is safe to conclude that surgery is an effective measure and ultimately enhances the quality of life.","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  To determine the surgical Outcome for a prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc based on a visual analog score. Materials and Methods:  A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Questionnaires were used to collect demographic data, presenting symptoms, and the level of the herniated discs. The patients underwent different surgical interventions and then these patients were followed for 2 weeks postoperatively and the surgical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). Results:  A total of 34 (61.8%) males and 21 (38.2%) females were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 36.14 ± 9.30 years. L5/S1 was the most commonly affected level. Laminar fenestration was the most common surgical procedure done in 23 (41.8%) patients followed by hemilaminectomy in 19 (34.5%) patients and bilateral laminectomy in 13 (23.6%). Post-operative pain was relieved in the majority of patients which is 43 (78.2%). Conclusion:  Medical management remains the mainstay in the majority of patients having lumbar disc prolapse. However, in cases where the pain is refractory to conservative management, surgery is considered after careful patient selection. It was seen that surgical intervention successfully reduced the intensity of pain and resulted in a symptomatically improved patient. Hence it is safe to conclude that surgery is an effective measure and ultimately enhances the quality of life.
基于视觉模拟评分的腰椎间盘突出症的手术效果
目的:根据视觉模拟评分确定腰椎间盘突出症的手术结果。材料和方法:在卡拉奇真纳研究生医学中心神经外科进行了一项前瞻性研究。共有55名患者被纳入研究。调查问卷用于收集人口统计数据、表现症状和椎间盘突出程度。术后随访2周,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价手术效果。结果:共纳入男性34例(61.8%),女性21例(38.2%)。患者平均年龄36.14±9.30岁。L5/S1是最常见的受累节段。椎板开窗是23例(41.8%)患者中最常见的手术方式,其次是19例(34.5%)的半椎板切除术和13例(23.6%)的双侧椎板切除术。大多数患者术后疼痛得到缓解,为43例(78.2%)。结论:医学治疗仍然是大多数腰椎间盘突出症患者的主要治疗方法。然而,在疼痛难以保守治疗的情况下,在仔细选择患者后考虑手术。手术干预成功地减轻了疼痛的强度,并使患者的症状得到改善。因此,可以肯定地说手术是一种有效的措施,并最终提高了生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信