DIALECTIC OF THE MEANING OF ABORTUS PROVOCATEUR ON THE CRIME OF RAPE VICTIMS

Cepalo Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.25041/cepalo.v6no2.2590
N. Satrio, Wiend Sakti Myharto, M. S. Anwar
{"title":"DIALECTIC OF THE MEANING OF ABORTUS PROVOCATEUR ON THE CRIME OF RAPE VICTIMS","authors":"N. Satrio, Wiend Sakti Myharto, M. S. Anwar","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v6no2.2590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legalization of abortion for rape victims creates a dialectic in substance as well as the application of the theories and principles that surround it. The author tries to see the meaning from two different sides, namely from the interests of protecting rape victims and the interests of the children conceived by rape victims. The method used by the author is a normative juridical approach.\nThe meaning contained in abortion provocatus from the point of view of a rape victim is actually a protection for the victim. This protection is certainly protection from the effects or impacts of the actions of the perpetrators of rape. Meanwhile, the meaning contained in abortion provocatus from the point of view of Human Rights (HAM) clearly leads to the fulfillment of the right to life of the fetus mentioned in the previous description, which is called a child who is still in the womb. the author provides suggestions as solutions to problems that may arise, including: (1) the need for synchronization and harmonization of existing regulations, in this case between regulations on health and regulations on human rights; (2) legislators must prioritize higher interests in the event of a similar situation. The human rights interests of children who are in the womb according to the author must be prioritized.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cepalo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v6no2.2590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legalization of abortion for rape victims creates a dialectic in substance as well as the application of the theories and principles that surround it. The author tries to see the meaning from two different sides, namely from the interests of protecting rape victims and the interests of the children conceived by rape victims. The method used by the author is a normative juridical approach. The meaning contained in abortion provocatus from the point of view of a rape victim is actually a protection for the victim. This protection is certainly protection from the effects or impacts of the actions of the perpetrators of rape. Meanwhile, the meaning contained in abortion provocatus from the point of view of Human Rights (HAM) clearly leads to the fulfillment of the right to life of the fetus mentioned in the previous description, which is called a child who is still in the womb. the author provides suggestions as solutions to problems that may arise, including: (1) the need for synchronization and harmonization of existing regulations, in this case between regulations on health and regulations on human rights; (2) legislators must prioritize higher interests in the event of a similar situation. The human rights interests of children who are in the womb according to the author must be prioritized.
奸淫犯对强奸被害人犯罪意义的辨证
强奸受害者堕胎合法化在本质上创造了一种辩证法,以及围绕它的理论和原则的应用。笔者试图从保护强奸受害者的利益和强奸受害者所孕育的孩子的利益两个不同的角度来看待这一意义。作者使用的方法是一种规范的司法方法。从强奸受害者的角度来看,堕胎挑衅所包含的含义实际上是对受害者的保护。这种保护当然是保护妇女不受强奸犯行为的影响或影响。同时,从人权(HAM)的角度来看,“挑衅堕胎”(abortion provocatus)所包含的含义显然导致了前面描述中提到的胎儿的生命权的实现,这被称为仍在子宫内的儿童。提交人提出了解决可能出现的问题的建议,包括:(1)需要同步和协调现有条例,在这种情况下是卫生条例和人权条例之间的同步和协调;(2)在类似情况下,立法者必须优先考虑更高的利益。根据发件人的说法,必须优先考虑子宫内儿童的人权利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信