Cost Effective Solution for Replacing Amine Columns

Ibrahim Al Awadhi, Ashok Sharma, Saleimah Al Zeyoudi
{"title":"Cost Effective Solution for Replacing Amine Columns","authors":"Ibrahim Al Awadhi, Ashok Sharma, Saleimah Al Zeyoudi","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22610-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Amine Regenerator column is in operation since 1980 and severe internal corrosion / erosion observed since 2000 and subsequent local shell course replacement in 2015 and 2017 were done. Therefore, to avoid frequent maintenance and repair cost and to ensure long-term measure of integrity and availability of the equipment, it was concluded to replace the existing CS column with enhanced metallurgy\n \n \n \n The convectional approach of replacing the full column with CS +SS 3mm clad material which typically take around 12 month schedule for fabrication activities in dedicated shutdown in 2021. In addition, this replacement was planned to include replacement of full internals of amine column, existing foundation, pipe support and platform. Moreover, the execution strategy planned to be through FEED/EPC. However, looking for enhanced metallurgy and studying the local market stock of raw material and manufacturer have a big role to carry out the replacement job in planned shutdown in 2020 and within planned budget.\n \n \n \n The solution in going with solid SS vessel instead of clad will not only improve integrity but also will lead to enhanced schedule into 6.5 months and it is the most commercially attractive option. Moreover, going with solid SS material will reduce the fabrication time and avoid the issues associated with cladded materials and the requirements of the NDT due to welding job. In addition, it was planned to replace partially the column internals after reviewing the inspection history instead of replacing them fully. Further, the column and column internals procurement were accomplish with in in-house resources. The installation job of column, column internals, and foundation carried out within available planed June 2020 shutdown.\n The development of execution strategy/in-house engineering led to avoid of 35-days unit 2021 shutdown. Also, achieving direct cost saving of USD 1 million in procurement of Column and Column Internal from the planned budget.\n Further, the availability of SS solid material in UAE ex-stock and local manufacturer, were considered in minimizing the transportation and delivery schedule.\n \n \n \n The column replacement was the solution to tackle the repetitive corrosion/ thickness loss failures in the vessel. The way forward of replacing full column with SS solid material will improve integrity, enhanced delivery schedule, commercially it is an attractive option and has direct support to ADNOC ICV strategy. Hence, this job will avoid the dedicated 35 days in 2021 shutdown and accordingly the revenues losses of OPCOs shutdown\n","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22610-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amine Regenerator column is in operation since 1980 and severe internal corrosion / erosion observed since 2000 and subsequent local shell course replacement in 2015 and 2017 were done. Therefore, to avoid frequent maintenance and repair cost and to ensure long-term measure of integrity and availability of the equipment, it was concluded to replace the existing CS column with enhanced metallurgy The convectional approach of replacing the full column with CS +SS 3mm clad material which typically take around 12 month schedule for fabrication activities in dedicated shutdown in 2021. In addition, this replacement was planned to include replacement of full internals of amine column, existing foundation, pipe support and platform. Moreover, the execution strategy planned to be through FEED/EPC. However, looking for enhanced metallurgy and studying the local market stock of raw material and manufacturer have a big role to carry out the replacement job in planned shutdown in 2020 and within planned budget. The solution in going with solid SS vessel instead of clad will not only improve integrity but also will lead to enhanced schedule into 6.5 months and it is the most commercially attractive option. Moreover, going with solid SS material will reduce the fabrication time and avoid the issues associated with cladded materials and the requirements of the NDT due to welding job. In addition, it was planned to replace partially the column internals after reviewing the inspection history instead of replacing them fully. Further, the column and column internals procurement were accomplish with in in-house resources. The installation job of column, column internals, and foundation carried out within available planed June 2020 shutdown. The development of execution strategy/in-house engineering led to avoid of 35-days unit 2021 shutdown. Also, achieving direct cost saving of USD 1 million in procurement of Column and Column Internal from the planned budget. Further, the availability of SS solid material in UAE ex-stock and local manufacturer, were considered in minimizing the transportation and delivery schedule. The column replacement was the solution to tackle the repetitive corrosion/ thickness loss failures in the vessel. The way forward of replacing full column with SS solid material will improve integrity, enhanced delivery schedule, commercially it is an attractive option and has direct support to ADNOC ICV strategy. Hence, this job will avoid the dedicated 35 days in 2021 shutdown and accordingly the revenues losses of OPCOs shutdown
成本有效的解决方案,以取代胺柱
胺再生塔自1980年开始运行,自2000年以来观察到严重的内部腐蚀/侵蚀,随后在2015年和2017年进行了局部壳层更换。因此,为了避免频繁的维护和维修成本,并确保设备的长期完整性和可用性,结论是用强化冶金取代现有的CS柱。传统的方法是用CS +SS 3mm包覆材料替换整个柱,这通常需要大约12个月的时间来完成制造活动,并在2021年专门停工。此外,此次更换计划包括更换胺柱、现有基础、管道支撑和平台的全部内部构件。此外,执行策略计划通过FEED/EPC。然而,在2020年计划停产和计划预算范围内,寻找加强的冶金和研究当地原材料和制造商的市场库存对开展替代工作具有重要作用。采用固体SS容器代替覆层的解决方案不仅可以提高完整性,还可以将工期延长至6.5个月,这是最具商业吸引力的选择。此外,使用固体SS材料将减少制造时间,避免与包覆材料相关的问题以及由于焊接工作而导致的无损检测要求。此外,计划在审查检查历史后部分更换柱内件,而不是全部更换。此外,柱和柱内部采购完成在内部资源。柱、柱内部和基础的安装工作在计划的2020年6月停工期间进行。执行策略/内部工程的发展避免了2021年35天的停工。同时,从计划预算中直接节省了100万美元的Column和Column Internal采购成本。此外,考虑到阿联酋库存和当地制造商的SS固体材料的可用性,以最大限度地减少运输和交货时间表。柱更换是解决容器中反复腐蚀/厚度损失故障的解决方案。用SS固体材料替代全柱将提高完整性,加快交付进度,在商业上是一个有吸引力的选择,并直接支持ADNOC ICV战略。因此,该作业将避免在2021年关闭35天,从而避免opco关闭的收入损失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信