Can Headache Help to Rule out Stroke Mimics during Stroke Alert

E. Sidorov, David Thompson, V. Pandav, Joshua Santucci, B. Bohnstedt, Bappaditya Ray
{"title":"Can Headache Help to Rule out Stroke Mimics during Stroke Alert","authors":"E. Sidorov, David Thompson, V. Pandav, Joshua Santucci, B. Bohnstedt, Bappaditya Ray","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: When patients present to the emergency department (ED) with acute focal neurological deficit, sometimes it is hard to make a decision about IV thrombolysis. In such situations, neurologists need to make a judgment call about it. According to some studies, IV thrombolysis is safe for patients with stroke mimics; however, a small possibility of hemorrhage still exists. Furthermore, unnecessary IV thrombolysis in stroke mimics significantly increases cost of care. We aimed to determine if presence of headache in patients with focal neurological deficit during stroke alerts makes a difference in the neurologist decision about IV thrombolysis. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review of 326 patients who presented to The University of Oklahoma Medical Center (OUMC) as a stroke alert in 2013. \nResults: At OUMC, 151 patients were ineligible for IV thrombolysis. Out of the remaining 175 patients, 62 presented with and 113 without headache. Seven out of the 62 patients with headache were initially diagnosed in the ED with ischemic stroke and received IV thrombolysis. On later evaluation, all of these 62 patients turned out to be stroke mimics. Forty-five out of 113 patients without headache were initially diagnosed as ischemic stroke in the ED and received IV thrombolysis. Nine of these 45 patients were later diagnosed as stroke mimics while 36 had ischemic stroke. Out of the remaining 68 patients without headache, who were initially diagnosed with stroke mimics and did not receive IV thrombolysis, 4 were later diagnosed with ischemic stroke and 64 were confirmed stroke mimics. In general, patients with headache had much less frequent IV thrombolysis 7/62 (11%) than patients without headache 45/113 (40%) (p<0.0001). No patients with headache, compared to 40 patients (36 who had IV thrombolysis+4 who did not) without headache, were later diagnosed with ischemic stroke (p<0.0001). \nConclusion: Patients with headache and acute focal neurological deficit less frequently receive IV thrombolysis and are less frequently diagnosed with ischemic stroke after completion of workup. Presence of headache may help neurologists to decide whether to do IV thrombolysis.","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"52 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: When patients present to the emergency department (ED) with acute focal neurological deficit, sometimes it is hard to make a decision about IV thrombolysis. In such situations, neurologists need to make a judgment call about it. According to some studies, IV thrombolysis is safe for patients with stroke mimics; however, a small possibility of hemorrhage still exists. Furthermore, unnecessary IV thrombolysis in stroke mimics significantly increases cost of care. We aimed to determine if presence of headache in patients with focal neurological deficit during stroke alerts makes a difference in the neurologist decision about IV thrombolysis. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 326 patients who presented to The University of Oklahoma Medical Center (OUMC) as a stroke alert in 2013. Results: At OUMC, 151 patients were ineligible for IV thrombolysis. Out of the remaining 175 patients, 62 presented with and 113 without headache. Seven out of the 62 patients with headache were initially diagnosed in the ED with ischemic stroke and received IV thrombolysis. On later evaluation, all of these 62 patients turned out to be stroke mimics. Forty-five out of 113 patients without headache were initially diagnosed as ischemic stroke in the ED and received IV thrombolysis. Nine of these 45 patients were later diagnosed as stroke mimics while 36 had ischemic stroke. Out of the remaining 68 patients without headache, who were initially diagnosed with stroke mimics and did not receive IV thrombolysis, 4 were later diagnosed with ischemic stroke and 64 were confirmed stroke mimics. In general, patients with headache had much less frequent IV thrombolysis 7/62 (11%) than patients without headache 45/113 (40%) (p<0.0001). No patients with headache, compared to 40 patients (36 who had IV thrombolysis+4 who did not) without headache, were later diagnosed with ischemic stroke (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Patients with headache and acute focal neurological deficit less frequently receive IV thrombolysis and are less frequently diagnosed with ischemic stroke after completion of workup. Presence of headache may help neurologists to decide whether to do IV thrombolysis.
在中风警报期间,头痛能帮助排除中风模仿吗
目的:急性局灶性神经功能缺损患者在急诊科就诊时,有时难以决定是否进行静脉溶栓治疗。在这种情况下,神经科医生需要对此做出判断。根据一些研究,静脉溶栓对脑卒中模拟患者是安全的;然而,出血的可能性很小。此外,卒中模拟患者不必要的静脉溶栓显著增加了护理成本。我们的目的是确定脑卒中预警期间局灶性神经功能障碍患者出现头痛是否会影响神经科医生对静脉溶栓的决定。方法:对2013年向俄克拉何马大学医学中心(OUMC)提出卒中预警的326例患者进行回顾性分析。结果:在OUMC, 151例患者不适合静脉溶栓。在剩下的175名患者中,62名出现头痛,113名没有头痛。62例头痛患者中有7例最初在ED诊断为缺血性卒中并接受静脉溶栓治疗。在后来的评估中,这62名患者都是中风模拟患者。113例无头痛的患者中有45例在ED中最初被诊断为缺血性卒中并接受静脉溶栓治疗。这45名患者中有9名后来被诊断为中风模拟,36名为缺血性中风。其余68例无头痛患者,最初诊断为卒中模拟,未接受静脉溶栓治疗,其中4例后来诊断为缺血性卒中,64例确诊为卒中模拟。总的来说,头痛患者静脉溶栓次数7/62(11%)远低于无头痛患者45/113 (40%)(p<0.0001)。与40名无头痛的患者(36例静脉溶栓+4例未溶栓)相比,没有头痛的患者后来被诊断为缺血性卒中(p<0.0001)。结论:头痛和急性局灶性神经功能缺损患者接受静脉溶栓治疗的频率较低,完成检查后诊断为缺血性脑卒中的频率较低。头痛的出现可以帮助神经科医生决定是否进行静脉溶栓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信