Development of Fluorescence Tagged Scale Inhibitors for Squeeze Applications in Gulf of Mexico

Ya Liu, Dong Lee, Haiping Lu, Jeffrey Russek
{"title":"Development of Fluorescence Tagged Scale Inhibitors for Squeeze Applications in Gulf of Mexico","authors":"Ya Liu, Dong Lee, Haiping Lu, Jeffrey Russek","doi":"10.2118/204349-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fluorescence tagged (F-tagged) scale inhibitors are drawing more interest in the oil industry and are being applied in the field. One main reason is being easily detectable and differentiable from other scale inhibitors. However, when applied to a new oilfield, it is necessary to evaluate their thermal stability, limit of detection (LOD), and fluorescence measurement interference from other chemicals. Two F-tagged scale inhibitors were tested in this study. They are the same polymeric inhibitors with different and differentiable fluorescent tags. Both F-tagged inhibitors were able to be detected in synthetic brine and field brine from a Gulf of Mexico (GoM) field, with LOD of 1ppm. A coreflood test was also conducted for inhibitor squeeze treatment evaluation. The residual scale inhibitor in core flooding samples was measured by both fluorescence method and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results from two methods generally match with each other. This strongly indicates that the F-tag is stable on scale inhibitors and fluorescence measurement is a reliable method for scale inhibitor detection. Thermal aging test and long storage test were conducted. For both F-tagged scale inhibitors, the thermal aged samples and samples with different storage lifetime did not show significant difference on scale inhibition performance and fluorescence measurement. The two F-tagged inhibitors tested can tolerate high temperature up to at least 130°C (266°F). With proper storage, F-tagged inhibitors after long shelf storage were still as effective as fresh inhibitors. Based on all the test results in this paper, these two scale inhibitors are ready for squeeze application in GoM.","PeriodicalId":11099,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, December 06, 2021","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, December 06, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204349-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluorescence tagged (F-tagged) scale inhibitors are drawing more interest in the oil industry and are being applied in the field. One main reason is being easily detectable and differentiable from other scale inhibitors. However, when applied to a new oilfield, it is necessary to evaluate their thermal stability, limit of detection (LOD), and fluorescence measurement interference from other chemicals. Two F-tagged scale inhibitors were tested in this study. They are the same polymeric inhibitors with different and differentiable fluorescent tags. Both F-tagged inhibitors were able to be detected in synthetic brine and field brine from a Gulf of Mexico (GoM) field, with LOD of 1ppm. A coreflood test was also conducted for inhibitor squeeze treatment evaluation. The residual scale inhibitor in core flooding samples was measured by both fluorescence method and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results from two methods generally match with each other. This strongly indicates that the F-tag is stable on scale inhibitors and fluorescence measurement is a reliable method for scale inhibitor detection. Thermal aging test and long storage test were conducted. For both F-tagged scale inhibitors, the thermal aged samples and samples with different storage lifetime did not show significant difference on scale inhibition performance and fluorescence measurement. The two F-tagged inhibitors tested can tolerate high temperature up to at least 130°C (266°F). With proper storage, F-tagged inhibitors after long shelf storage were still as effective as fresh inhibitors. Based on all the test results in this paper, these two scale inhibitors are ready for squeeze application in GoM.
荧光标记阻垢剂在墨西哥湾挤压应用的发展
荧光标记(F-tagged)阻垢剂在石油工业中引起了越来越多的兴趣,并在该领域得到了应用。一个主要原因是易于检测和区分其他阻垢剂。然而,当应用于新油田时,有必要评估它们的热稳定性、检出限(LOD)以及其他化学品对荧光测量的干扰。本研究测试了两种f标记的阻垢剂。它们是相同的聚合物抑制剂,具有不同的和可区分的荧光标签。两种f标记抑制剂都能够在墨西哥湾(GoM)油田的合成盐水和现场盐水中检测到,LOD为1ppm。还进行了岩心注水试验,以评估抑制剂挤压处理的效果。采用荧光法和高效液相色谱法测定岩心驱替样品中阻垢剂残留量。两种方法的结果通常是一致的。这强烈表明f -标签在阻垢剂上是稳定的,荧光测量是一种可靠的阻垢剂检测方法。进行了热老化试验和长时间贮藏试验。对于两种f标记的阻垢剂,热老化样品和不同储存寿命的样品在阻垢性能和荧光测量上没有显著差异。测试的两种F标记抑制剂可以耐受高达至少130°C(266°F)的高温。通过适当的储存,f标记的抑制剂在长时间的货架储存后仍然与新鲜抑制剂一样有效。根据本文的所有测试结果,这两种阻垢剂已经准备好在GoM中进行挤压应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信