Effect of Extraction Techniques on Phytochemicals and Antioxidants Activity of Garcinia quaesita Leaves

Q3 Engineering
S. Kokilananthan, V. Bulugahapitiya, H. Manawadu, C. S. Gangabadage
{"title":"Effect of Extraction Techniques on Phytochemicals and Antioxidants Activity of Garcinia quaesita Leaves","authors":"S. Kokilananthan, V. Bulugahapitiya, H. Manawadu, C. S. Gangabadage","doi":"10.31357/ait.v2i1.5444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Garcinia quaesita is an endemic plant in Sri Lanka with a wide array of domestic and medicinal values, yet very limited studies have been reported. The goal of this study was to investigate the phytochemicals and antioxidants capacity of leaves of G. quaesita under different extraction techniques in order to monitor the effect of extraction techniques on the above parameters. Water was used as the solvent and four extraction methods, namely sonication (EN01, one-hour,RT, 40 kHz), Soxhlet (EN02, six-hours, 105 ºC), maceration with agitation (EN03, six-hours, RT, 1000 rpm), and maceration with agitation upon heating (EN04, six-hours, 60 ºC, 1000 rpm), were applied. Phytochemical screenings and quantification of polyphenolics (TPC), flavonoids (TFC), tannins (TTC), terpenoids (TC), saponins (SC), and alkaloids (AC) were performed using standard methods, whereas antioxidants capacity was assessed using FRAP and DPPH assays. The results revealed that G. quaesita contains a wide range of phytochemicals and the TPC, TTC and SC profiles appeared to be higher in the extraction process of EN04 (60.73 ± 0.06 mg GAE/g, 60.12 ± 0.06 mg TAE/g, and 257.64 ± 0.72 mg SE/g, respectively) whereas those were lower in the technique EN01. In addition, TFC and TC levels were high in EN02 (3.02 ± 0.00 mg QE/g and 17.75 ± 0.04 mM LE/g respectively) and besides, TFC was low in method EN03, whereas TC was low in EN01. Interestingly, AC was found to be higher in EN03 (1.16 ± 0.03 mg AE/g) and lesser in EN02. Total antioxidant capacity ( FRAP value) was calculated to be higher in extraction method EN04 (72.08 ± 0.00 mg Trolox Eq/g) whereas it was lower in extraction method EN01. The method, EN03 gave the lower IC50 value in DPPH radical scavenging assay (10.49 ± 0.12 mg/ml), indicating high scavenging activity. In conclusion, the extraction technique EN04 is well suitable to extract polyphenolics and antioxidants from G. quaesita leaves. Though G. quaesita leaves contain a diverse range of bioactive compounds and antioxidants properties, it is important to choose the correct extraction technique based on the objectives of the desired research work, as the number of phytochemicals extracted, and antioxidant capacity varies depending on the extraction technique used.\nFull paper submission of ICIET 2021","PeriodicalId":52314,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Technology Innovation","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Technology Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/ait.v2i1.5444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Garcinia quaesita is an endemic plant in Sri Lanka with a wide array of domestic and medicinal values, yet very limited studies have been reported. The goal of this study was to investigate the phytochemicals and antioxidants capacity of leaves of G. quaesita under different extraction techniques in order to monitor the effect of extraction techniques on the above parameters. Water was used as the solvent and four extraction methods, namely sonication (EN01, one-hour,RT, 40 kHz), Soxhlet (EN02, six-hours, 105 ºC), maceration with agitation (EN03, six-hours, RT, 1000 rpm), and maceration with agitation upon heating (EN04, six-hours, 60 ºC, 1000 rpm), were applied. Phytochemical screenings and quantification of polyphenolics (TPC), flavonoids (TFC), tannins (TTC), terpenoids (TC), saponins (SC), and alkaloids (AC) were performed using standard methods, whereas antioxidants capacity was assessed using FRAP and DPPH assays. The results revealed that G. quaesita contains a wide range of phytochemicals and the TPC, TTC and SC profiles appeared to be higher in the extraction process of EN04 (60.73 ± 0.06 mg GAE/g, 60.12 ± 0.06 mg TAE/g, and 257.64 ± 0.72 mg SE/g, respectively) whereas those were lower in the technique EN01. In addition, TFC and TC levels were high in EN02 (3.02 ± 0.00 mg QE/g and 17.75 ± 0.04 mM LE/g respectively) and besides, TFC was low in method EN03, whereas TC was low in EN01. Interestingly, AC was found to be higher in EN03 (1.16 ± 0.03 mg AE/g) and lesser in EN02. Total antioxidant capacity ( FRAP value) was calculated to be higher in extraction method EN04 (72.08 ± 0.00 mg Trolox Eq/g) whereas it was lower in extraction method EN01. The method, EN03 gave the lower IC50 value in DPPH radical scavenging assay (10.49 ± 0.12 mg/ml), indicating high scavenging activity. In conclusion, the extraction technique EN04 is well suitable to extract polyphenolics and antioxidants from G. quaesita leaves. Though G. quaesita leaves contain a diverse range of bioactive compounds and antioxidants properties, it is important to choose the correct extraction technique based on the objectives of the desired research work, as the number of phytochemicals extracted, and antioxidant capacity varies depending on the extraction technique used. Full paper submission of ICIET 2021
提取工艺对猕猴桃叶片化学成分及抗氧化活性的影响
黄藤黄(Garcinia quaesita)是斯里兰卡的一种特有植物,具有广泛的家庭和药用价值,但报道的研究非常有限。本研究旨在研究不同提取工艺条件下,猕猴桃叶片的化学成分和抗氧化能力,以监测不同提取工艺对上述参数的影响。以水为溶剂,采用超声(EN01, 1小时,RT, 40 kHz)、索氏(EN02, 6小时,105℃)、搅拌浸渍(EN03, 6小时,RT, 1000 rpm)和加热搅拌浸渍(EN04, 6小时,60℃,1000 rpm)四种提取方法。采用标准方法对多酚类物质(TPC)、黄酮类物质(TFC)、单宁类物质(TTC)、萜类物质(TC)、皂苷类物质(SC)和生物碱类物质(AC)进行植物化学筛选和定量,采用FRAP和DPPH法评估抗氧化能力。结果表明,黄芪含有广泛的植物化学成分,在EN04工艺中,黄芪的TPC、TTC和SC含量较高(分别为60.73±0.06 mg GAE/g、60.12±0.06 mg TAE/g和257.64±0.72 mg SE/g),而在EN01工艺中,黄芪的TPC、TTC和SC含量较低。EN02法TFC和TC含量较高(分别为3.02±0.00 mg QE/g和17.75±0.04 mM LE/g),且EN03法TFC含量较低,EN01法TC含量较低。有趣的是,EN03组AC较高(1.16±0.03 mg AE/g), EN02组AC较低。计算总抗氧化能力(FRAP值),提取方法EN04(72.08±0.00 mg Trolox Eq/g)较高,而提取方法EN01较低。结果表明,EN03对DPPH自由基的IC50值较低(10.49±0.12 mg/ml),具有较强的清除活性。综上所述,EN04提取技术是提取山核桃叶中多酚类物质和抗氧化剂的较好方法。虽然猕猴桃叶含有多种生物活性化合物和抗氧化剂,但重要的是要根据所需研究工作的目标选择正确的提取技术,因为提取的植物化学物质的数量和抗氧化能力取决于所使用的提取技术。ICIET 2021论文全文提交
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Technology Innovation
Advances in Technology Innovation Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信