Writing the Naked Body: Sex and Nudity in Nuala Ní Chonchuír’s Nude

4区 文学
Máximo Aláez Corral
{"title":"Writing the Naked Body: Sex and Nudity in Nuala Ní Chonchuír’s Nude","authors":"Máximo Aláez Corral","doi":"10.24162/ei2016-6193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction John Berger says about the female nude in painting: \"She is not naked as she is. She is naked as the spectator sees her\" (1972: 50). Berger's work directly addresses the differences between nakedness and nudity, especially when connected with voyeurism, and was one of the first efforts to bring awareness to the phenomenon of objectification--i.e. treating a subject as an object--of women in art. Sexual objectification has been analysed repeatedly from different perspectives, but probably the feminist approach remains the more interesting, even despite the high level of diversity and occasional confrontations deriving from each analysis within the feminist methodological paradigm. Laura Mulvey also established a cornerstone in the critical analysis of the male gaze and objectification of women in Hollywood's classic cinema with her 1975 essay \"Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema\". (1) A couple of decades later, Martha Nussbaum (1995) defined the basic ingredients in the production of objectification in her analysis of texts by several authors, ranging from D.H. Lawrence to James Joyce or Henry James. Nussbaum cited seven key factors or notions for a process of objectification to be complete: \"instrumentality\", \"denial of autonomy\", \"inertness\", \"fungibility\", \"violability\", \"ownership\", and \"denial of subjectivity\" (1995: 257). In between Mulvey's and Nussbaum's essays other feminists released their own analyses of objectification in contemporary cultural manifestations. This was the case of Andrea Dworkin and her book Pornography: Men Possessing Women (1979), or Catherine Mackinnon's Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women's Equality (1988), written in collaboration with Dworkin. The topic I would like to focus on in this essay, however, is not so much pornography as objectification and the way(s) in which the latter is connected to the representation of nudity, as exemplified in Nuala Ni Chonchuir's (2) collection of short stories Nude (2009). (3) Far from shying away from such a delicate subject-matter, Ni Chonchuir boldly explores the possibilities of representing/narrating the naked body (both male and female), in tight connection with a preference for the sexual reading of the body as it is gazed upon by a far from innocent gendered \"gaze\". It is precisely this particular way of depicting and interpreting the naked body that interests me, for both sexual objectification and the (fe)male gaze are combined in Nude to produce a piece of literature that unexpectedly reverses the orthodox normative dichotomies concerning nudity and at the same time blurs gender differences between male and female \"ways of seeing\". Can we, therefore, identify a 'genuine' non-objectifying gaze in Ni Chonchuir's stories? Probably the best way to find an answer to this question would be to briefly examine some aspects of both (sexual) objectification and the male gaze, in order to reach some insight for the analysis of these evasive stories. The Sexualized Gaze: Objectified Bodies Much has been written about the 'male gaze' as regards the process of objectification of women--especially regarding the representation of women in cinema. Although the work I intend to analyse is a literary piece and not a film, the theoretical framework on the 'male gaze' may prove useful for the purposes of my research: thus, it is my contention that Ni Chonchuir plays with the representation of the naked body in an ambiguous way in order to bring out a heteronormative discriminatory approach found both in literature and in the visual arts. By so doing she manages to turn conventional assumptions around nudity and nakedness into a scenario filled with dysfunction, consequently establishing a new ground for a non-normative--and non-discriminatory--representation of both women and men. Laura Mulvey and John Berger, as has already been stated, devoted some of their finest reflections to explain the way in which women are objectified in Hollywood cinema and in European visual arts, respectively. …","PeriodicalId":29863,"journal":{"name":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","volume":"83 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24162/ei2016-6193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction John Berger says about the female nude in painting: "She is not naked as she is. She is naked as the spectator sees her" (1972: 50). Berger's work directly addresses the differences between nakedness and nudity, especially when connected with voyeurism, and was one of the first efforts to bring awareness to the phenomenon of objectification--i.e. treating a subject as an object--of women in art. Sexual objectification has been analysed repeatedly from different perspectives, but probably the feminist approach remains the more interesting, even despite the high level of diversity and occasional confrontations deriving from each analysis within the feminist methodological paradigm. Laura Mulvey also established a cornerstone in the critical analysis of the male gaze and objectification of women in Hollywood's classic cinema with her 1975 essay "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema". (1) A couple of decades later, Martha Nussbaum (1995) defined the basic ingredients in the production of objectification in her analysis of texts by several authors, ranging from D.H. Lawrence to James Joyce or Henry James. Nussbaum cited seven key factors or notions for a process of objectification to be complete: "instrumentality", "denial of autonomy", "inertness", "fungibility", "violability", "ownership", and "denial of subjectivity" (1995: 257). In between Mulvey's and Nussbaum's essays other feminists released their own analyses of objectification in contemporary cultural manifestations. This was the case of Andrea Dworkin and her book Pornography: Men Possessing Women (1979), or Catherine Mackinnon's Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women's Equality (1988), written in collaboration with Dworkin. The topic I would like to focus on in this essay, however, is not so much pornography as objectification and the way(s) in which the latter is connected to the representation of nudity, as exemplified in Nuala Ni Chonchuir's (2) collection of short stories Nude (2009). (3) Far from shying away from such a delicate subject-matter, Ni Chonchuir boldly explores the possibilities of representing/narrating the naked body (both male and female), in tight connection with a preference for the sexual reading of the body as it is gazed upon by a far from innocent gendered "gaze". It is precisely this particular way of depicting and interpreting the naked body that interests me, for both sexual objectification and the (fe)male gaze are combined in Nude to produce a piece of literature that unexpectedly reverses the orthodox normative dichotomies concerning nudity and at the same time blurs gender differences between male and female "ways of seeing". Can we, therefore, identify a 'genuine' non-objectifying gaze in Ni Chonchuir's stories? Probably the best way to find an answer to this question would be to briefly examine some aspects of both (sexual) objectification and the male gaze, in order to reach some insight for the analysis of these evasive stories. The Sexualized Gaze: Objectified Bodies Much has been written about the 'male gaze' as regards the process of objectification of women--especially regarding the representation of women in cinema. Although the work I intend to analyse is a literary piece and not a film, the theoretical framework on the 'male gaze' may prove useful for the purposes of my research: thus, it is my contention that Ni Chonchuir plays with the representation of the naked body in an ambiguous way in order to bring out a heteronormative discriminatory approach found both in literature and in the visual arts. By so doing she manages to turn conventional assumptions around nudity and nakedness into a scenario filled with dysfunction, consequently establishing a new ground for a non-normative--and non-discriminatory--representation of both women and men. Laura Mulvey and John Berger, as has already been stated, devoted some of their finest reflections to explain the way in which women are objectified in Hollywood cinema and in European visual arts, respectively. …
写裸体:Nuala Ní Chonchuír的裸体中的性和裸体
约翰·伯杰(John Berger)这样评价绘画中的女性裸体:“她并不像她自己那样裸体。在观众眼中,她是赤裸的”(1972:50)。伯杰的作品直接解决了裸体和裸体之间的差异,特别是当与窥阴癖联系在一起时,这是第一个让人们意识到物化现象的努力之一。把主体当作客体——艺术中的女性。性物化已经从不同的角度被反复分析,但可能女权主义的方法仍然更有趣,即使在女权主义方法论范式的每种分析中都有高度的多样性和偶尔的对抗。劳拉·穆尔维1975年发表的论文《视觉愉悦与叙事电影》也为好莱坞经典电影中男性凝视和女性物化的批判性分析奠定了基石。(1)几十年后,玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum, 1995)在分析从d·h·劳伦斯到詹姆斯·乔伊斯或亨利·詹姆斯等几位作家的作品时,定义了物化产生的基本要素。Nussbaum列举了客观化过程完成的七个关键因素或概念:“工具性”、“否定自主性”、“惰性”、“可替代性”、“可侵犯性”、“所有权”和“否定主体性”(1995:257)。在穆尔维和努斯鲍姆的文章之间,其他女权主义者发表了他们自己对当代文化表现中的物化的分析。安德里亚·德沃金和她的《色情:男人占有女人》(1979),以及凯瑟琳·麦金农与德沃金合作的《色情与民权:女性平等的新一天》(1988)就是这样的例子。然而,在这篇文章中,我想关注的主题不是色情,而是物化,以及物化与裸体表现的联系方式,就像Nuala Ni Chonchuir的短篇小说集《Nude》(2009)中所体现的那样。(3)倪春秋并没有回避这样一个微妙的主题,而是大胆地探索了表现/叙述裸体(男性和女性)的可能性,并与对身体的性阅读的偏好紧密联系在一起,因为它被一种远非无辜的性别“凝视”所凝视。正是这种描绘和解释裸体的特殊方式引起了我的兴趣,因为性物化和(非)男性凝视在《裸体》中结合在一起,产生了一种意想不到的文学作品,颠覆了关于裸体的正统规范二分法,同时模糊了男性和女性“观看方式”之间的性别差异。因此,我们能否在倪春春的故事中找到一种“真正的”非物化的凝视?也许找到这个问题答案的最好方法是简单地检查一下(性)物化和男性凝视的某些方面,以便对这些逃避的故事进行分析。关于女性物化过程中的“男性凝视”——尤其是关于女性在电影中的表现——已经有很多文章。尽管我打算分析的作品是一部文学作品而不是一部电影,但“男性凝视”的理论框架可能对我的研究目的有用:因此,我的论点是,倪春春以一种模棱两可的方式玩弄裸体的表现,以引出一种在文学和视觉艺术中都能找到的异性恋规范的歧视方法。通过这样做,她成功地将关于裸体和裸体的传统假设变成了一个充满功能障碍的场景,从而为女性和男性的非规范和非歧视性代表建立了一个新的基础。前面已经说过,劳拉·穆尔维和约翰·伯杰分别用他们最精彩的反思来解释女性在好莱坞电影和欧洲视觉艺术中被物化的方式。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书