Phrase final lengthening modulates categorization of vowel length as a cue to obstruent voicing in English

Jeremy Steffman
{"title":"Phrase final lengthening modulates categorization of vowel length as a cue to obstruent voicing in English","authors":"Jeremy Steffman","doi":"10.1121/2.0000832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how perceptual sensitivities to contextual variability might extend to prosodically conditioned variation, a recent topic of interest in the literature. In English, vowel duration is reliably longer preceding a voiced obstruent, as opposed to a voiceless obstruent, and listeners use preceding length as a cue to obstruent voicing. Segmental duration also co-varies systematically with prosodic position, being longer phrase-finally (in phrase-final lengthening). With this in mind, The present study tested the extent to which listeners’ categorization of word-final obstruents is influenced by the prosodic position of the target sound. Participants heard a continuum that varied only in vowel length, and categorized stimuli as either “coat” or “code”. Prosodic position in a carrier phrase was manipulated by splicing the target word into either a phrase-final or phrase-medial context. Results suggest expectations about phrase-final lengthening shift categorization, with significantly longer vowel durations required in phrase-final position for a “code” response. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for further research and in relation to speech rate normalization.This study explores how perceptual sensitivities to contextual variability might extend to prosodically conditioned variation, a recent topic of interest in the literature. In English, vowel duration is reliably longer preceding a voiced obstruent, as opposed to a voiceless obstruent, and listeners use preceding length as a cue to obstruent voicing. Segmental duration also co-varies systematically with prosodic position, being longer phrase-finally (in phrase-final lengthening). With this in mind, The present study tested the extent to which listeners’ categorization of word-final obstruents is influenced by the prosodic position of the target sound. Participants heard a continuum that varied only in vowel length, and categorized stimuli as either “coat” or “code”. Prosodic position in a carrier phrase was manipulated by splicing the target word into either a phrase-final or phrase-medial context. Results suggest expectations about phrase-final lengthening shift categorization, with significantly longer v...","PeriodicalId":20469,"journal":{"name":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explores how perceptual sensitivities to contextual variability might extend to prosodically conditioned variation, a recent topic of interest in the literature. In English, vowel duration is reliably longer preceding a voiced obstruent, as opposed to a voiceless obstruent, and listeners use preceding length as a cue to obstruent voicing. Segmental duration also co-varies systematically with prosodic position, being longer phrase-finally (in phrase-final lengthening). With this in mind, The present study tested the extent to which listeners’ categorization of word-final obstruents is influenced by the prosodic position of the target sound. Participants heard a continuum that varied only in vowel length, and categorized stimuli as either “coat” or “code”. Prosodic position in a carrier phrase was manipulated by splicing the target word into either a phrase-final or phrase-medial context. Results suggest expectations about phrase-final lengthening shift categorization, with significantly longer vowel durations required in phrase-final position for a “code” response. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for further research and in relation to speech rate normalization.This study explores how perceptual sensitivities to contextual variability might extend to prosodically conditioned variation, a recent topic of interest in the literature. In English, vowel duration is reliably longer preceding a voiced obstruent, as opposed to a voiceless obstruent, and listeners use preceding length as a cue to obstruent voicing. Segmental duration also co-varies systematically with prosodic position, being longer phrase-finally (in phrase-final lengthening). With this in mind, The present study tested the extent to which listeners’ categorization of word-final obstruents is influenced by the prosodic position of the target sound. Participants heard a continuum that varied only in vowel length, and categorized stimuli as either “coat” or “code”. Prosodic position in a carrier phrase was manipulated by splicing the target word into either a phrase-final or phrase-medial context. Results suggest expectations about phrase-final lengthening shift categorization, with significantly longer v...
短语末段拉长调节了元音长度的分类,提示了英语发音的障碍
本研究探讨了对语境变化的感知敏感性如何扩展到韵律条件变化,这是最近的一个有趣的文献话题。在英语中,元音在发声障碍前的持续时间比在不发声障碍前的持续时间要长,听者会把前面的长度作为发声障碍的线索。音段持续时间也与韵律位置系统地共变,在短语末延长(在短语末延长)。考虑到这一点,本研究测试了听者对词尾障碍的分类在多大程度上受到目标音韵律位置的影响。参与者听到的是一个连续体,只有元音长度不同,并将刺激分类为“外套”或“代码”。载体短语的韵律位置是通过将目标词拼接到短语末语境或短语中间语境来实现的。结果表明,在“代码”反应中,短语末位置需要更长的元音持续时间。本文讨论了这些结果对进一步研究的意义以及与语速规范化的关系。本研究探讨了对语境变化的感知敏感性如何扩展到韵律条件变化,这是最近的一个有趣的文献话题。在英语中,元音在发声障碍前的持续时间比在不发声障碍前的持续时间要长,听者会把前面的长度作为发声障碍的线索。音段持续时间也与韵律位置系统地共变,在短语末延长(在短语末延长)。考虑到这一点,本研究测试了听者对词尾障碍的分类在多大程度上受到目标音韵律位置的影响。参与者听到的是一个连续体,只有元音长度不同,并将刺激分类为“外套”或“代码”。载体短语的韵律位置是通过将目标词拼接到短语末语境或短语中间语境来实现的。结果表明,对短语-最终延长移位分类的预期,显著延长了v。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信