Influence of sodium hypochlorite and chlorexidine on the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Finisher instruments

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elson Lopes Medeiros Junior, A. Limoeiro, Alexandra Tanomaro, Adriana de Jesus Soares, Gabriel Fillipe Centini Campos, Nelson T. Mohara, Wayne Martins, Danilo de Luca Campos, M. Frozoni
{"title":"Influence of sodium hypochlorite and chlorexidine on the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Finisher instruments","authors":"Elson Lopes Medeiros Junior, A. Limoeiro, Alexandra Tanomaro, Adriana de Jesus Soares, Gabriel Fillipe Centini Campos, Nelson T. Mohara, Wayne Martins, Danilo de Luca Campos, M. Frozoni","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study evaluated the cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), associated with two different irrigation solutions: sodium hypochlorite 6% (NaOCl) or chlorhexidine digluconate gel 2% (CHX) in a dynamic model. The null hypothesis tested was that there was no statistically significant difference. \nMethodology: 30 new files were divided into three groups (n=10) based on the irrigation solution used. Group 1: XPF using CHX as an irrigation solution; Group 2: XPF using NaOCl as an irrigation solution; Group 3 (control group): XPF using lubricating oil (LO). The artificial canal was manufactured measuring 1.5 mm wide, 20 mm long, and 3.5 mm deep with a straight cervical segment measuring 14.29 mm. A curved apical segment 4.71 mm with 3 mm radius and 90° of curvature and an ending with straight apical portion measuring 1 mm long. Resistance to cyclic fatigue was determined by recording time to fracture, and the file surface was examined under scanning electron microscopy. \nResults: Data were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis of variance. Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5%. The average time took for file fracture was 306.7 seconds for 2% chlorhexidine and 67,6 for 6% sodium hypochlorite. 2% CHX was significantly different from the NaOCl and LO groups (P< .001). \nConclusions: XPF presented the best results of fracture time and the number of cycles to fracture when used along with 2% chlorhexidine in canals with severe apical curvature, and there was no statistical difference in fragment size.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), associated with two different irrigation solutions: sodium hypochlorite 6% (NaOCl) or chlorhexidine digluconate gel 2% (CHX) in a dynamic model. The null hypothesis tested was that there was no statistically significant difference. Methodology: 30 new files were divided into three groups (n=10) based on the irrigation solution used. Group 1: XPF using CHX as an irrigation solution; Group 2: XPF using NaOCl as an irrigation solution; Group 3 (control group): XPF using lubricating oil (LO). The artificial canal was manufactured measuring 1.5 mm wide, 20 mm long, and 3.5 mm deep with a straight cervical segment measuring 14.29 mm. A curved apical segment 4.71 mm with 3 mm radius and 90° of curvature and an ending with straight apical portion measuring 1 mm long. Resistance to cyclic fatigue was determined by recording time to fracture, and the file surface was examined under scanning electron microscopy. Results: Data were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis of variance. Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5%. The average time took for file fracture was 306.7 seconds for 2% chlorhexidine and 67,6 for 6% sodium hypochlorite. 2% CHX was significantly different from the NaOCl and LO groups (P< .001). Conclusions: XPF presented the best results of fracture time and the number of cycles to fracture when used along with 2% chlorhexidine in canals with severe apical curvature, and there was no statistical difference in fragment size.
次氯酸钠和氯乙胺对XP-Endo精加工仪动态抗循环疲劳性能的影响
目的:本研究在动态模型中评估了XPF - endo Finisher (XPF)与两种不同灌溉溶液(次氯酸钠6% (NaOCl)或二光酸氯己定凝胶2% (CHX))的循环疲劳抗性。检验的零假设是没有统计学上的显著差异。方法:将30个新锉按冲洗液的不同分为3组(n=10)。第一组:以CHX为灌洗液的XPF;第二组:以NaOCl为灌洗液的XPF;第三组(对照组):XPF使用润滑油(LO)。人工管宽1.5 mm,长20 mm,深3.5 mm,颈段直长14.29 mm。一个弯曲的根尖部分,直径4.71毫米,半径3mm,曲率90°,根尖部分直,长度1mm。通过记录断裂时间来测定锉的抗循环疲劳性能,并在扫描电镜下对锉表面进行了观察。结果:将数据制成表格,进行方差统计分析。Student-Newman-Keuls多重比较检验,显著性水平为5%。2%氯己定和6%次氯酸钠的平均骨折时间分别为306.7秒和67.6秒。2% CHX与NaOCl、LO组比较差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001)。结论:XPF与2%氯己定联合应用于严重根尖弯曲管的骨折时间和骨折循环次数最佳,且碎片大小无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信