Employer-Sponsored Career Development Practices and Employee Performance and Turnover: A Meta-Analysis

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Thomas W. H. Ng, F. Yim, Haoyang Chen, Yinuo Zou
{"title":"Employer-Sponsored Career Development Practices and Employee Performance and Turnover: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Thomas W. H. Ng, F. Yim, Haoyang Chen, Yinuo Zou","doi":"10.1177/01492063221125143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational programs and policies are important facilitators of employees’ career development. However, organizations face a developmental paradox: Their career-aiding programs and policies might increase the employability of their employees, who might then leave the company. Guided by organizational support theory, we propose a theory-driven reciprocation view that explains why organization-sponsored career development practices might actually strengthen the current employment relationship. We argued that by offering career aids and resources, an organization can promote its employees’ perceptions of organizational support. These perceptions evoke reciprocation, manifested in strengthened organizational attachment that enhances job performance and lowers turnover. In a meta-analysis of over 1,000 articles, we found that employer-sponsored career development practices were related to employees’ job performance and turnover via the mechanisms of perceived organizational support and organizational attachment. Further, this relationship was even stronger when career development practices signaled greater care by being available (vs. used), institutionally embedded (vs. relational), and career focused (vs. job focused).","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221125143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Organizational programs and policies are important facilitators of employees’ career development. However, organizations face a developmental paradox: Their career-aiding programs and policies might increase the employability of their employees, who might then leave the company. Guided by organizational support theory, we propose a theory-driven reciprocation view that explains why organization-sponsored career development practices might actually strengthen the current employment relationship. We argued that by offering career aids and resources, an organization can promote its employees’ perceptions of organizational support. These perceptions evoke reciprocation, manifested in strengthened organizational attachment that enhances job performance and lowers turnover. In a meta-analysis of over 1,000 articles, we found that employer-sponsored career development practices were related to employees’ job performance and turnover via the mechanisms of perceived organizational support and organizational attachment. Further, this relationship was even stronger when career development practices signaled greater care by being available (vs. used), institutionally embedded (vs. relational), and career focused (vs. job focused).
雇主赞助的职业发展实践与员工绩效和离职:一项元分析
组织计划和政策是员工职业发展的重要促进因素。然而,组织面临着一个发展悖论:他们的职业援助计划和政策可能会提高员工的就业能力,而这些员工可能会离开公司。在组织支持理论的指导下,我们提出了一个理论驱动的互惠观点来解释为什么组织赞助的职业发展实践实际上可能会加强当前的雇佣关系。我们认为,通过提供职业帮助和资源,组织可以提高员工对组织支持的看法。这些感知唤起了回报,表现在加强组织依恋,提高工作绩效和降低人员流动率。通过对1000多篇文章的荟萃分析,我们发现雇主赞助的职业发展实践通过感知组织支持和组织依恋的机制与员工的工作绩效和离职有关。此外,当职业发展实践通过可用性(vs.使用性)、制度嵌入性(vs.关系性)和以职业为中心(vs.工作为中心)表明了更大的关注时,这种关系甚至更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信