Discordance of Tracer Transport and Particulate Matter Fate in a Baffled Clarification System

IF 1.8 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Haochen Li, S. Balachandar, J. Sansalone
{"title":"Discordance of Tracer Transport and Particulate Matter Fate in a Baffled Clarification System","authors":"Haochen Li, S. Balachandar, J. Sansalone","doi":"10.1115/1.4049690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Large eddy simulation (LES) and coupled physical laboratory-scale modeling are performed to elucidate tracer transport and particulate matter (PM) fate in a baffled clarification system. Such baffled systems are common for urban water unit operations and processes. Flow hydrodynamic indices of these systems such as short-circuiting are often examined with measurement of inert tracer transport as a surrogate for chemical or PM transport and fate. Results of this study illustrate complex interactions between turbulent flow, tracer, and various PM diameters at the system scale. PM preferential accumulation and the discordance of PM transport with respect to flow hydrodynamics are observed based on the modeling results; otherwise not practical with physical model testing. Results demonstrate that baffling can promote system tracer mixing and improve volumetric utilization by extending the mean flow path through flow separation and bifurcation. The baffle tested produced high turbulence kinetic energy near the sedimentation floor and reduced PM separation (clarification) as compared to the unbaffled system used as a control. The unbaffled system in this study yields the highest PM separation, even though significant short-circuiting occurs during the residence time distribution (RTD) of the tracer. Further analysis demonstrates the mechanistic difference between the tracer transport and the finer suspended PM as compared to larger settleable and sediment PM diameters. Results illustrate that the tracer RTD, residence time (RT) and hydraulic efficiency indices are not reliable surrogates for PM or PM-bound chemical/pathogen separation. In addition, simulations suggest a site, system or condition-specific design approach given the coupled dependence on flow and design geometry.","PeriodicalId":54833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Large eddy simulation (LES) and coupled physical laboratory-scale modeling are performed to elucidate tracer transport and particulate matter (PM) fate in a baffled clarification system. Such baffled systems are common for urban water unit operations and processes. Flow hydrodynamic indices of these systems such as short-circuiting are often examined with measurement of inert tracer transport as a surrogate for chemical or PM transport and fate. Results of this study illustrate complex interactions between turbulent flow, tracer, and various PM diameters at the system scale. PM preferential accumulation and the discordance of PM transport with respect to flow hydrodynamics are observed based on the modeling results; otherwise not practical with physical model testing. Results demonstrate that baffling can promote system tracer mixing and improve volumetric utilization by extending the mean flow path through flow separation and bifurcation. The baffle tested produced high turbulence kinetic energy near the sedimentation floor and reduced PM separation (clarification) as compared to the unbaffled system used as a control. The unbaffled system in this study yields the highest PM separation, even though significant short-circuiting occurs during the residence time distribution (RTD) of the tracer. Further analysis demonstrates the mechanistic difference between the tracer transport and the finer suspended PM as compared to larger settleable and sediment PM diameters. Results illustrate that the tracer RTD, residence time (RT) and hydraulic efficiency indices are not reliable surrogates for PM or PM-bound chemical/pathogen separation. In addition, simulations suggest a site, system or condition-specific design approach given the coupled dependence on flow and design geometry.
挡板澄清系统中示踪剂输运与颗粒物命运的不一致
采用大涡模拟(LES)和耦合物理实验室尺度模型来阐明在挡板澄清系统中示踪剂输运和颗粒物(PM)的命运。这种挡板系统在城市水单元操作和过程中很常见。这些系统的流体动力学指标,如短路,通常用惰性示踪剂输运的测量来检测,作为化学或PM输运和命运的替代。本研究的结果说明了湍流、示踪剂和不同PM直径之间在系统尺度上的复杂相互作用。根据模拟结果观察到PM优先积累和PM输运与流动流体动力学的不一致性;否则不适合物理模型测试。结果表明,挡板可以通过流动分离和分岔扩大平均流道,从而促进体系示踪剂的混合,提高体积利用率。测试的挡板在沉降底附近产生了高湍流动能,与用作对照的未挡板系统相比,减少了PM分离(澄清)。在这项研究中,即使在示踪剂的停留时间分布(RTD)期间发生显著的短路,该系统也能产生最高的PM分离。进一步的分析表明,与较大的可沉降PM和沉积物PM直径相比,示踪剂输运和较细的悬浮PM之间的机制差异。结果表明,示踪剂RTD、停留时间(RT)和水力效率指标不能可靠地代替PM或PM结合的化学/病原体分离。此外,模拟还提出了一种基于流量和设计几何的耦合依赖的场地、系统或特定条件的设计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
165
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: Multiphase flows; Pumps; Aerodynamics; Boundary layers; Bubbly flows; Cavitation; Compressible flows; Convective heat/mass transfer as it is affected by fluid flow; Duct and pipe flows; Free shear layers; Flows in biological systems; Fluid-structure interaction; Fluid transients and wave motion; Jets; Naval hydrodynamics; Sprays; Stability and transition; Turbulence wakes microfluidics and other fundamental/applied fluid mechanical phenomena and processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信