Multiple facets of conflict of interest.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
R. Balon
{"title":"Multiple facets of conflict of interest.","authors":"R. Balon","doi":"10.12788/acp.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most physicians, the phrase “conflict of interest” (COI) usually refers to a financial COI, such as physicians receiving payments from a pharmaceutical company. Financial COI is the most frequently discussed COI, and the one disclosed at the end of articles in professional journals. However, financial COI is not the only COI an individual may have. The recent debate about the origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 and the possibility that it escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, revealed another facet of COI—the impact of ideology and personal belief. Some researchers strongly opposed the lab leak theory and attacked those who proposed it. For many, the fact that President Donald J. Trump proposed the virus originated in China was argument enough to label the lab leak theory as yet another conspiracy theory. Additionally, there is what I call “ideological bias” or “ideological COI,” eg, some of the opponents of the lab leak theory were probably impacted by the fact that their reputation would be ruined if it turned out to be true. Unbelievably, Facebook and Wikipedia initially banned any suggestion that the virus may had leaked from the Wuhan laboratory. Interestingly, with President Trump’s departure from office, more people were willing to entertain the possibility that the virus that causes COVID-19 escaped from the laboratory and were willing to investigate this theory. I believe this tale does not paint a very laudatory picture of many scientists and the state of present-day science. It also raises serious questions about nonfinancial COIs. I believe that compared to financial COIs, nonfinancial COIs have a similar, if not worse, impact on scientific conduct. As a profession, psychiatry has focused on discussing and disclosing financial COIs. Yet, there are numerous nonfinancial pressures and COIs. As Korn wrote, “These pressures ... include the desire for faculty advancement, to compete successfully and repetitively for sponsored research funding, to receive academic accolades from professional peers and win Richard Balon, MD Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences and Anesthesiology Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan, USA","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"59 1","pages":"73-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For most physicians, the phrase “conflict of interest” (COI) usually refers to a financial COI, such as physicians receiving payments from a pharmaceutical company. Financial COI is the most frequently discussed COI, and the one disclosed at the end of articles in professional journals. However, financial COI is not the only COI an individual may have. The recent debate about the origin of the virus that causes COVID-19 and the possibility that it escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, revealed another facet of COI—the impact of ideology and personal belief. Some researchers strongly opposed the lab leak theory and attacked those who proposed it. For many, the fact that President Donald J. Trump proposed the virus originated in China was argument enough to label the lab leak theory as yet another conspiracy theory. Additionally, there is what I call “ideological bias” or “ideological COI,” eg, some of the opponents of the lab leak theory were probably impacted by the fact that their reputation would be ruined if it turned out to be true. Unbelievably, Facebook and Wikipedia initially banned any suggestion that the virus may had leaked from the Wuhan laboratory. Interestingly, with President Trump’s departure from office, more people were willing to entertain the possibility that the virus that causes COVID-19 escaped from the laboratory and were willing to investigate this theory. I believe this tale does not paint a very laudatory picture of many scientists and the state of present-day science. It also raises serious questions about nonfinancial COIs. I believe that compared to financial COIs, nonfinancial COIs have a similar, if not worse, impact on scientific conduct. As a profession, psychiatry has focused on discussing and disclosing financial COIs. Yet, there are numerous nonfinancial pressures and COIs. As Korn wrote, “These pressures ... include the desire for faculty advancement, to compete successfully and repetitively for sponsored research funding, to receive academic accolades from professional peers and win Richard Balon, MD Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences and Anesthesiology Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan, USA
利益冲突的多个方面。
对于大多数医生来说,术语“利益冲突”(COI)通常指的是财务上的COI,例如医生从制药公司收取报酬。财务COI是讨论频率最高的COI,也是在专业期刊文章末尾披露的COI。然而,财务COI并不是个人可能拥有的唯一COI。最近关于导致COVID-19的病毒的来源以及病毒可能从中国武汉的一个实验室逃逸的争论,揭示了coi的另一个方面——意识形态和个人信仰的影响。一些研究人员强烈反对实验室泄漏理论,并攻击提出这一理论的人。对许多人来说,唐纳德·j·特朗普总统提出病毒起源于中国这一事实足以让实验室泄密论成为又一个阴谋论。此外,还有我所说的“意识形态偏见”或“意识形态COI”,例如,实验室泄密理论的一些反对者可能受到这样一个事实的影响,即如果它被证明是真的,他们的声誉将被毁。令人难以置信的是,Facebook和维基百科最初禁止任何关于病毒可能从武汉实验室泄露的说法。有趣的是,随着特朗普总统的离任,更多人愿意接受导致COVID-19的病毒从实验室逃逸的可能性,并愿意调查这一理论。我相信这个故事并没有描绘出许多科学家和当今科学状况的美好图景。这也引发了有关非金融投资组合的严重问题。我认为,与金融coi相比,非金融coi对科学行为的影响即使不是更糟,也是相似的。作为一种职业,精神病学一直专注于讨论和披露财务coi。然而,还有许多非金融压力和投资回报率。正如科恩所写,“这些压力……包括对教师进步的渴望,成功地竞争和反复获得赞助的研究资金,从专业同行那里获得学术荣誉,并赢得美国密歇根州底特律韦恩州立大学精神病学和行为神经科学和麻醉学博士理查德·巴隆
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信