Is Saline Injection a True Sham/Placebo Treatment in Randomized Controlled Trials? A Systematic Review

N. Mekhail, Youssef Saweris, Lou-Anne Acevedo-Moreno
{"title":"Is Saline Injection a True Sham/Placebo Treatment in Randomized Controlled Trials? A Systematic Review","authors":"N. Mekhail, Youssef Saweris, Lou-Anne Acevedo-Moreno","doi":"10.31487/j.nnb.2021.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore whether saline is a real sham/placebo agent, or it has potential therapeutic effects when used as control treatment in randomized controlled trials for the management of discogenic low back pain.\nMethods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted investigating the effects of saline as a placebo in the treatment of chronic pain when administered into the intervertebral disc. Following stepwise filtering, selected articles were assessed for their levels of evidence, followed by a discussion of their contribution to the understanding of the role of saline in chronic pain management.\nResults: Out of 95 articles that described the administration of intradiscal saline solution used as a placebo for chronic pain management, 8 articles met all of the inclusion criteria. Their levels of evidence ranged from 1a to 4 (Oxford Centre CEBM). Intradiscal administration of saline solution was found to have measurable therapeutic benefits. In some studies, the pain relief was similar to that provided by local anaesthetics and steroids.\nConclusion: Although the exact mechanism of the analgesic effects of saline is not clear, yet the use of intradiscal saline appears to have some analgesic benefits like local anaesthetics and steroids when used individually. Researchers should practice caution when designing RCTs using intradiscal saline injection as a sham/placebo treatment for the control arm or maybe, when possible, avoid the use of intradiscal saline injection as a sham treatment.\n","PeriodicalId":19179,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Neurobiology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.nnb.2021.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To explore whether saline is a real sham/placebo agent, or it has potential therapeutic effects when used as control treatment in randomized controlled trials for the management of discogenic low back pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted investigating the effects of saline as a placebo in the treatment of chronic pain when administered into the intervertebral disc. Following stepwise filtering, selected articles were assessed for their levels of evidence, followed by a discussion of their contribution to the understanding of the role of saline in chronic pain management. Results: Out of 95 articles that described the administration of intradiscal saline solution used as a placebo for chronic pain management, 8 articles met all of the inclusion criteria. Their levels of evidence ranged from 1a to 4 (Oxford Centre CEBM). Intradiscal administration of saline solution was found to have measurable therapeutic benefits. In some studies, the pain relief was similar to that provided by local anaesthetics and steroids. Conclusion: Although the exact mechanism of the analgesic effects of saline is not clear, yet the use of intradiscal saline appears to have some analgesic benefits like local anaesthetics and steroids when used individually. Researchers should practice caution when designing RCTs using intradiscal saline injection as a sham/placebo treatment for the control arm or maybe, when possible, avoid the use of intradiscal saline injection as a sham treatment.
在随机对照试验中,生理盐水注射是一种真正的假/安慰剂治疗吗?系统回顾
目的:探讨生理盐水是否是一种真正的假/安慰剂剂,或者在随机对照试验中作为对照治疗椎间盘源性腰痛有潜在的治疗效果。方法:进行了全面的文献检索,调查生理盐水作为安慰剂在治疗慢性疼痛时给药到椎间盘的效果。在逐步筛选之后,选定的文章被评估其证据水平,然后讨论他们对理解生理盐水在慢性疼痛管理中的作用的贡献。结果:在95篇描述将硬膜内生理盐水溶液作为安慰剂用于慢性疼痛治疗的文章中,有8篇文章符合所有纳入标准。他们的证据等级从1a到4(牛津中心CEBM)。经研究发现,椎间盘内给予生理盐水溶液具有可测量的治疗效果。在一些研究中,镇痛效果与局部麻醉剂和类固醇相似。结论:虽然生理盐水镇痛作用的确切机制尚不清楚,但椎间盘内生理盐水单独使用具有局部麻醉剂和类固醇的镇痛作用。研究人员在设计随机对照试验时应谨慎使用椎间盘内生理盐水注射作为对照组的假/安慰剂治疗,或者在可能的情况下,避免使用椎间盘内生理盐水注射作为假治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信