The prognostic value of HLA loss of heterozygosity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with relapsed acute leukemia

Q4 Medicine
L. Tsvetkova, A. V. Evdokimov, I. Barkhatov, O. V. Paina, O. Epifanovskaya, E. Babenko, N. Ivanova, Z. Rakhmanova, P. Kozhokar, A. Frolova, A. Osipova, S. V. Ryabenko, D. V. Kozlov, T. Gindina, E. Semenova, A. Kulagin, L. S. Zubarovskaya
{"title":"The prognostic value of HLA loss of heterozygosity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with relapsed acute leukemia","authors":"L. Tsvetkova, A. V. Evdokimov, I. Barkhatov, O. V. Paina, O. Epifanovskaya, E. Babenko, N. Ivanova, Z. Rakhmanova, P. Kozhokar, A. Frolova, A. Osipova, S. V. Ryabenko, D. V. Kozlov, T. Gindina, E. Semenova, A. Kulagin, L. S. Zubarovskaya","doi":"10.24287/1726-1708-2023-22-2-44-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   The loss of a patient-specific HLA haplotype on the surface of the blast cell population is one of the ways a tumor can evade the immune surveillance of donor cells. This phenomenon is observed in approximately 30 % of relapses in patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent partially mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, for the first time, a large cohort of pediatric patients (n = 80) with relapsed acute myeloid (AML) or acute lymphoblastic (ALL) leukemia after allogeneic HSCT was analyzed with the help of the STR method (highlypolymorphic microsatellite marker analysis) using 6 HLA haplotype markers. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the I. P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was observed in 18 / 80 (22 %) relapsed patients with various types of acute leukemia: out of these, 8 / 44 (18 %) patients had B-cell ALL, 4 / 10 (40 %) patients – T-cell ALL and 6 / 25 (24 %) patients – AML. All relapses with LOH were observed in patients who had undergone haploidentical HSCT, and were found to occur later than relapses without loss of the HLA haplotype (median time to relapse: 8.8 months vs 6.2 months, p = 0.043). In the patients treated with haploidentical HSCT (n = 61), we assessed factors increasing the risk of LOH at relapse. The number of previous therapy lines in the patients with AML (n = 17) and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease in the patients with ALL (n = 44) were associated with an increasedrisk of genetic loss of the HLA haplotype (p = 0.008 and p = 0.015 respectively). A relapse following the second allogeneic HSCT was associated with LOH in 4 / 5 (80 %) patients, p = 0.008. The prognosis of the patients with LOH was extremely poor. At a median follow-up of 6 months, the overall survival from relapse was 22 % in the LOH group and 37 % in the non-LOH group. The median overall survival was 4.5 months (95 % confidence interval 3–NA) and 10.3 months (95 % confidence interval 5.7–16.1) respectively, p = 0.063. Among the patients with LOH, the best survival rates were observed in those who had undergone a repeat allogeneic HSCT from a different donor. Thus, the analysis of LOH is an important tool for determining the prognosis and further treatment in pediatric patients with acute leukemias. We strongly recommend that this diagnostic test should be included into standard testing of patients after partially-mismatched allogeneic HSCT.","PeriodicalId":38370,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24287/1726-1708-2023-22-2-44-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

   The loss of a patient-specific HLA haplotype on the surface of the blast cell population is one of the ways a tumor can evade the immune surveillance of donor cells. This phenomenon is observed in approximately 30 % of relapses in patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent partially mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, for the first time, a large cohort of pediatric patients (n = 80) with relapsed acute myeloid (AML) or acute lymphoblastic (ALL) leukemia after allogeneic HSCT was analyzed with the help of the STR method (highlypolymorphic microsatellite marker analysis) using 6 HLA haplotype markers. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the I. P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was observed in 18 / 80 (22 %) relapsed patients with various types of acute leukemia: out of these, 8 / 44 (18 %) patients had B-cell ALL, 4 / 10 (40 %) patients – T-cell ALL and 6 / 25 (24 %) patients – AML. All relapses with LOH were observed in patients who had undergone haploidentical HSCT, and were found to occur later than relapses without loss of the HLA haplotype (median time to relapse: 8.8 months vs 6.2 months, p = 0.043). In the patients treated with haploidentical HSCT (n = 61), we assessed factors increasing the risk of LOH at relapse. The number of previous therapy lines in the patients with AML (n = 17) and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease in the patients with ALL (n = 44) were associated with an increasedrisk of genetic loss of the HLA haplotype (p = 0.008 and p = 0.015 respectively). A relapse following the second allogeneic HSCT was associated with LOH in 4 / 5 (80 %) patients, p = 0.008. The prognosis of the patients with LOH was extremely poor. At a median follow-up of 6 months, the overall survival from relapse was 22 % in the LOH group and 37 % in the non-LOH group. The median overall survival was 4.5 months (95 % confidence interval 3–NA) and 10.3 months (95 % confidence interval 5.7–16.1) respectively, p = 0.063. Among the patients with LOH, the best survival rates were observed in those who had undergone a repeat allogeneic HSCT from a different donor. Thus, the analysis of LOH is an important tool for determining the prognosis and further treatment in pediatric patients with acute leukemias. We strongly recommend that this diagnostic test should be included into standard testing of patients after partially-mismatched allogeneic HSCT.
异基因造血干细胞移植后HLA杂合性缺失对复发性急性白血病患儿预后的价值
原细胞群表面患者特异性HLA单倍型的缺失是肿瘤逃避供体细胞免疫监视的途径之一。在接受部分不匹配的同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的血液恶性肿瘤患者中,大约30%的复发患者观察到这种现象。本研究首次使用6种HLA单倍型标记,采用STR(高多态性微卫星标记分析)方法对异基因造血干细胞移植后复发急性髓系(AML)或急性淋巴母细胞(ALL)白血病患儿(n = 80)进行大队列分析。该研究得到了俄罗斯联邦卫生部巴甫洛夫第一圣彼得堡国立医科大学独立伦理委员会和科学委员会的批准。不同类型的急性白血病复发患者中有18 / 80(22%)观察到杂合性(LOH)的丧失:其中8 / 44(18%)患者为b细胞ALL, 4 / 10(40%)患者为t细胞ALL, 6 / 25(24%)患者为AML。所有LOH复发都发生在接受了单倍相同HSCT的患者中,并且发现复发时间比复发时间晚,但没有丢失HLA单倍型(中位复发时间:8.8个月vs 6.2个月,p = 0.043)。在接受单倍体HSCT治疗的患者中(n = 61),我们评估了增加LOH复发风险的因素。AML患者(n = 17)和ALL患者(n = 44)的急性或慢性移植物抗宿主病患者(n = 44)的既往治疗系数与HLA单倍型遗传丢失的风险增加相关(p = 0.008和p = 0.015)。在4 / 5(80%)的患者中,第二次异体造血干细胞移植后复发与LOH相关,p = 0.008。LOH患者预后极差。在中位随访6个月时,LOH组复发后的总生存率为22%,非LOH组为37%。中位总生存期分别为4.5个月(95%可信区间3-NA)和10.3个月(95%可信区间5.7-16.1),p = 0.063。在LOH患者中,接受不同供体重复同种异体造血干细胞移植的患者生存率最高。因此,LOH的分析是判断小儿急性白血病患者预后和进一步治疗的重要工具。我们强烈建议将此诊断测试纳入部分不匹配的同种异体造血干细胞移植后患者的标准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology
Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信