A Scoping Review of the Impact of Emergency Department Nurse Practitioners on Healthcare Outcomes in Canada Patient Safety Solution

Timur Bazavluk, U. Pant, Krooti Vyas, Kathleen Hunter, Elisavet Papathanasoglou
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Impact of Emergency Department Nurse Practitioners on Healthcare Outcomes in Canada Patient Safety Solution","authors":"Timur Bazavluk, U. Pant, Krooti Vyas, Kathleen Hunter, Elisavet Papathanasoglou","doi":"10.29173/ijcc43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are a valuable yet untapped resource in Canadian healthcare – especially in the emergency department (ED). Multiple international studies showed positive outcomes associated with NPs working in EDs, but limited Canadian studies are available. \nAim: The objective of this study was to review the literature available in Canada on the outcomes associated with having NPs in the ED. These outcomes include wait times, length of stay (LOS), rates of patients who left without being seen (LWBS), willingness to be treated by an NP, and patient satisfaction with their treatment by an NP. \nMethods: This scoping review was informed by the procedures outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Reporting was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Two independent reviewers systematically searched CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE in January 2022. All peer-reviewed articles that met the eligibility criteria were included. A pair of independent reviewers completed the selection process, screening, and data extraction. The reviewers discussed disagreements until they reached a consensus. \nResults: A total of five studies met the inclusion criteria. Decrease in wait times, LOS, rates of patients who LWBS, and increase in patient throughput were noted. One study did not find significant improvement in wait times, LOS, and rates of patients who LWBS. There was also a high rate of patient satisfaction and willingness to see an NP. \nConclusion: This review shows evidence of positive change on the outcomes of decreased wait times, LOS, rates of patients who LWBS, and patient satisfaction associated with having NPs in EDs. However, there is limited up-to-date evidence in the Canadian literature leaving room for future research. Future research needs to address outcomes associated with NPs working in the ED in Canadian provinces other than British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, research that is more in line with the current political climate of the pandemic and lack of resources, and how NPs can be best integrated into EDs","PeriodicalId":13937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are a valuable yet untapped resource in Canadian healthcare – especially in the emergency department (ED). Multiple international studies showed positive outcomes associated with NPs working in EDs, but limited Canadian studies are available. Aim: The objective of this study was to review the literature available in Canada on the outcomes associated with having NPs in the ED. These outcomes include wait times, length of stay (LOS), rates of patients who left without being seen (LWBS), willingness to be treated by an NP, and patient satisfaction with their treatment by an NP. Methods: This scoping review was informed by the procedures outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Reporting was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Two independent reviewers systematically searched CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE in January 2022. All peer-reviewed articles that met the eligibility criteria were included. A pair of independent reviewers completed the selection process, screening, and data extraction. The reviewers discussed disagreements until they reached a consensus. Results: A total of five studies met the inclusion criteria. Decrease in wait times, LOS, rates of patients who LWBS, and increase in patient throughput were noted. One study did not find significant improvement in wait times, LOS, and rates of patients who LWBS. There was also a high rate of patient satisfaction and willingness to see an NP. Conclusion: This review shows evidence of positive change on the outcomes of decreased wait times, LOS, rates of patients who LWBS, and patient satisfaction associated with having NPs in EDs. However, there is limited up-to-date evidence in the Canadian literature leaving room for future research. Future research needs to address outcomes associated with NPs working in the ED in Canadian provinces other than British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, research that is more in line with the current political climate of the pandemic and lack of resources, and how NPs can be best integrated into EDs
加拿大患者安全解决方案中急诊科护士从业人员对医疗保健结果影响的范围审查
背景:执业护士(NPs)是加拿大医疗保健中宝贵的尚未开发的资源,特别是在急诊科(ED)。多项国际研究表明,NPs在急诊室工作有积极的结果,但加拿大的研究有限。目的:本研究的目的是回顾加拿大现有的与急诊科NPs相关的结果的文献。这些结果包括等待时间、住院时间(LOS)、未就诊而离开的患者比例(LWBS)、接受NP治疗的意愿以及患者对NP治疗的满意度。方法:这项范围审查是由乔安娜布里格斯研究所概述的程序通知。报告由系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指导。两位独立审稿人于2022年1月系统地检索了CINAHL、EMBASE、SCOPUS、Cochrane Library和MEDLINE。所有符合入选标准的同行评议文章均被纳入。一对独立的审稿人完成了选择过程、筛选和数据提取。审稿人讨论分歧,直到达成一致意见。结果:共有5项研究符合纳入标准。观察到等待时间、LOS、LWBS患者率的减少以及患者吞吐量的增加。一项研究没有发现在等待时间、LOS和LWBS患者发生率方面有显著改善。患者满意度和求诊意愿也很高。结论:本综述显示了与急诊NPs相关的等待时间、LOS、LWBS患者率和患者满意度等结果的积极变化。然而,在加拿大文献中有有限的最新证据,为未来的研究留下了空间。未来的研究需要解决除不列颠哥伦比亚省、阿尔伯塔省和安大略省以外的加拿大各省在急诊室工作的国家卫生服务人员的相关结果,研究更符合当前大流行的政治气候和缺乏资源,以及如何将国家卫生服务人员最好地纳入急诊室
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信