The Relationship Between the Full Biophysical Profile and Rapid Biophysical Profile in Antepartum Fetal Surveillance

H. Pakniat, Ezzatalsadat Haji Seid Javadi, Venus Chegini, Nahid Khajevand, Simindokht Molaverdikhani
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Full Biophysical Profile and Rapid Biophysical Profile in Antepartum Fetal Surveillance","authors":"H. Pakniat, Ezzatalsadat Haji Seid Javadi, Venus Chegini, Nahid Khajevand, Simindokht Molaverdikhani","doi":"10.32598/jid.26.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the best tests for the assessment of a fetus is the biophysical profile test which has a significant effect on the fetus’s health and the outcome of pregnancy. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the full biophysical profile (FBP) and the rapid biophysical profile (RBP) tests in antepartum fetal surveillance. Methods: In this prospective study, Singleton pregnancies (n=209) with more than 34 weeks of gestational age were chosen. Both FBP and RBP tests were performed for all the patients. The main outcome is the Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission analyzed by SPSS software, version 24. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were calculated. Findings: Out of 209 people who entered the study, 48 women (23.0%) had gestational diabetes, 84 women (40.2%) had hypertension pregnancy (preeclampsia), 45 people (21.5%) had intrauterine growth restriction, and 45 women (21.5%) had post-date pregnancy. For predicting adverse fetal outcomes of pregnancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were 95%, 73%, 52%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the statistically significant positive correlation between RBP and FBP and its simple and rapid application, RBP might be an acceptable alternative method for primary antepartum fetal screening tests in overcrowded obstetrics centers.","PeriodicalId":91544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","volume":"6401 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jid.26.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the best tests for the assessment of a fetus is the biophysical profile test which has a significant effect on the fetus’s health and the outcome of pregnancy. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the full biophysical profile (FBP) and the rapid biophysical profile (RBP) tests in antepartum fetal surveillance. Methods: In this prospective study, Singleton pregnancies (n=209) with more than 34 weeks of gestational age were chosen. Both FBP and RBP tests were performed for all the patients. The main outcome is the Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission analyzed by SPSS software, version 24. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were calculated. Findings: Out of 209 people who entered the study, 48 women (23.0%) had gestational diabetes, 84 women (40.2%) had hypertension pregnancy (preeclampsia), 45 people (21.5%) had intrauterine growth restriction, and 45 women (21.5%) had post-date pregnancy. For predicting adverse fetal outcomes of pregnancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were 95%, 73%, 52%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the statistically significant positive correlation between RBP and FBP and its simple and rapid application, RBP might be an acceptable alternative method for primary antepartum fetal screening tests in overcrowded obstetrics centers.
产前胎儿监测中全生物物理特征与快速生物物理特征的关系
背景:生物体格检查是评估胎儿的最佳检查之一,它对胎儿的健康和妊娠结局有重要影响。本研究旨在确定全生物物理特征(FBP)和快速生物物理特征(RBP)试验在产前胎儿监测中的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,选择胎龄大于34周的单胎妊娠(n=209)。所有患者均行FBP和RBP试验。主要观察指标为Apgar评分和新生儿重症监护病房入住情况,采用SPSS软件进行分析。计算RBP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:在209名参与研究的女性中,48名女性(23.0%)患有妊娠糖尿病,84名女性(40.2%)患有高血压妊娠(先兆子痫),45名女性(21.5%)患有宫内生长受限,45名女性(21.5%)患有产后妊娠。预测妊娠不良胎儿结局,RBP的敏感性为95%,特异性为73%,阳性预测值为52%,阴性预测值为98%。结论:RBP与FBP呈正相关,且应用简便、快速,可作为拥挤产科中心产前胎儿筛查的一种可接受的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信