Analysis of Difference between Fencing Sabre's Score and Loss : Focusing on National Athletes Participated in the Tokyo Olympics 2020

Jin-Seok Lee, Ji-Eung Kim, S. Im
{"title":"Analysis of Difference between Fencing Sabre's Score and Loss : Focusing on National Athletes Participated in the Tokyo Olympics 2020","authors":"Jin-Seok Lee, Ji-Eung Kim, S. Im","doi":"10.24985/kjss.2022.33.3.511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE This study aimed to analyze the difference between scores and loss of world-class fencing sabre players. METHODS A total of 78 match videos and 1969 points of international competition over 3 years were analyzed for the nine major competitors of the national fencing team (Males = 5, Females = 4). The characteristics of each skill, body section and location according to the score were analyzed by dividing them into male and female groups. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0. RESULTS First, in the situation analysis according to the men's sabre score, attack skills were the most common in the winning situation (447 points, 73%) and in the situation of losing points (389 points, 72%); however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the piste location according to the score, B4 was the most common appearing 254 times (41.5%) in the scoring situation and A4, 243 (45%) times in the losing situation, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). Second, in the situation analysis according to the women’s sabre score, 315 attacks (70.6%) were found in the winning situation and 277 (74.7%) in the losing situation; however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the scoring body part, the Sixte area scored the highest with 121 points (27.1%), and the arm area lost the most points with 105 points (28.3%); however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the piste location according to the score, A4 was the most common in, appearing 179 times (40.1%) in the scoring situation, and 182 times (48.8%) in the losing situation, with no significant difference at the p < 0.001 level. CONCLUSIONS In the men's game, there were many scored points in B4 and many lost points in A4. In the women's game, there were many scored points and lost points in A4; therefore, the difference in goals and losses according to the piste position was confirmed. These results suggest that it is possible to infer the game management patterns of world sabre players and the flow of world fencing.","PeriodicalId":17892,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2022.33.3.511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to analyze the difference between scores and loss of world-class fencing sabre players. METHODS A total of 78 match videos and 1969 points of international competition over 3 years were analyzed for the nine major competitors of the national fencing team (Males = 5, Females = 4). The characteristics of each skill, body section and location according to the score were analyzed by dividing them into male and female groups. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0. RESULTS First, in the situation analysis according to the men's sabre score, attack skills were the most common in the winning situation (447 points, 73%) and in the situation of losing points (389 points, 72%); however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the piste location according to the score, B4 was the most common appearing 254 times (41.5%) in the scoring situation and A4, 243 (45%) times in the losing situation, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). Second, in the situation analysis according to the women’s sabre score, 315 attacks (70.6%) were found in the winning situation and 277 (74.7%) in the losing situation; however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the scoring body part, the Sixte area scored the highest with 121 points (27.1%), and the arm area lost the most points with 105 points (28.3%); however, the difference was not significant. In the analysis of the piste location according to the score, A4 was the most common in, appearing 179 times (40.1%) in the scoring situation, and 182 times (48.8%) in the losing situation, with no significant difference at the p < 0.001 level. CONCLUSIONS In the men's game, there were many scored points in B4 and many lost points in A4. In the women's game, there were many scored points and lost points in A4; therefore, the difference in goals and losses according to the piste position was confirmed. These results suggest that it is possible to infer the game management patterns of world sabre players and the flow of world fencing.
击剑计分与失分差异分析——以参加2020年东京奥运会的国家运动员为例
目的分析世界一流击剑运动员成绩与损失的差异。方法对国家击剑队9名主力选手(男5人,女4人)近3年来的78场比赛录像和1969个国际比赛积分进行分析,并按成绩分为男女两组,分析各技术、身体部位和位置的特点。数据采用IBM SPSS ver进行分析。25.0. 结果第一,在男子佩剑得分态势分析中,攻技在获胜态势(447分,73%)和输分态势(389分,72%)中最为常见;然而,差异并不显著。在根据得分进行的滑雪道位置分析中,得分情况下B4出现次数最多,为254次(41.5%),输球情况下A4出现次数最多,为243次(45%),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。其次,根据女子佩剑得分进行态势分析,发现胜局有315次(70.6%),败局有277次(74.7%);然而,差异并不显著。在得分部位的分析中,腰部区域得分最高,为121分(27.1%),手臂区域得分最高,为105分(28.3%);然而,差异并不显著。在根据得分进行的雪道位置分析中,A4最常见,在得分情况下出现179次(40.1%),在失分情况下出现182次(48.8%),在p < 0.001水平上无显著差异。结论男子比赛中,B4得分多,A4失分多。在女子比赛中,A4的得分和失分都很多;因此,根据滑道位置确定进球和损失的差异。这些结果表明,可以推断世界佩剑玩家的游戏管理模式和世界击剑的流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信