Wireline logs vs drilling events: Which one to believe in implying subsurface pressure?

IF 0.1 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Ramdhan, Arifin Arifin, Rusmawan Suwarman
{"title":"Wireline logs vs drilling events: Which one to believe in implying subsurface pressure?","authors":"A. Ramdhan, Arifin Arifin, Rusmawan Suwarman","doi":"10.14203/risetgeotam2021.v31.1176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As generally known, subsurface pressure can be implied using both wireline logs and drilling events. However, there may be a case where wireline logs and drilling events do not indicate the same subsurface pressure. Data from four vertical wells located in the South Sumatra Basin, Indonesia, were analyzed as a case study. Two wells, Wells A and D, encountered high overpressured zones, confirmed by drilling events and wireline logs data. The two others, Wells B and C, only encountered low overpressured zones, inferred by the relatively low mudweight used during the drilling. However, the wireline logs of Wells B and C show a reversal as Wells A and D. There are two hypotheses to explain the condition in Wells B and C. First, the wireline logs reversal is due to shallow carbonate cementation. Second, Wells B and C were drilled in an unintentional underbalanced condition. The method used includes XRD, SEM, and titration analysis. The results show that the first hypothesis is false, while the second is true. It may be due to some missing information related to drilling events in the final well report of Wells B and C.","PeriodicalId":41045,"journal":{"name":"Riset Geologi dan Pertambangan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Riset Geologi dan Pertambangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/risetgeotam2021.v31.1176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As generally known, subsurface pressure can be implied using both wireline logs and drilling events. However, there may be a case where wireline logs and drilling events do not indicate the same subsurface pressure. Data from four vertical wells located in the South Sumatra Basin, Indonesia, were analyzed as a case study. Two wells, Wells A and D, encountered high overpressured zones, confirmed by drilling events and wireline logs data. The two others, Wells B and C, only encountered low overpressured zones, inferred by the relatively low mudweight used during the drilling. However, the wireline logs of Wells B and C show a reversal as Wells A and D. There are two hypotheses to explain the condition in Wells B and C. First, the wireline logs reversal is due to shallow carbonate cementation. Second, Wells B and C were drilled in an unintentional underbalanced condition. The method used includes XRD, SEM, and titration analysis. The results show that the first hypothesis is false, while the second is true. It may be due to some missing information related to drilling events in the final well report of Wells B and C.
电缆测井与钻井事件:哪一个更能反映地下压力?
众所周知,地下压力可以通过电缆测井和钻井事件来推测。然而,也有可能电缆测井和钻井活动不能显示相同的地下压力。以印度尼西亚南苏门答腊盆地的4口直井数据为例进行了分析。通过钻井事件和电缆测井数据证实,A井和D井遇到了高超压区。另外两口井B和C只遇到了低超压区,这是由钻井过程中相对较低的泥浆比重推断出来的。然而,B井和C井的电缆测井显示出与a井和d井相同的反转。对于B井和C井的情况,有两种假设可以解释:第一,电缆测井反转是由于浅层碳酸盐胶结。其次,B井和C井在非故意欠平衡状态下钻井。所用方法包括XRD, SEM和滴定分析。结果表明,第一个假设是错误的,而第二个假设是正确的。这可能是由于B井和C井的最终井报告中缺少一些与钻井事件相关的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Riset Geologi dan Pertambangan
Riset Geologi dan Pertambangan GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信