Nietzsche and Gadamer on Truth and Interpretation

4区 社会学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Nibras Chehayed
{"title":"Nietzsche and Gadamer on Truth and Interpretation","authors":"Nibras Chehayed","doi":"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.2.0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the first glance, Nietzsche does not appear in the Gadamerian text as a crucial figure. Nonetheless, a careful reading will dissipate this first impression. Gadamer mentions Nietzsche on several occasions, and two of them are extremely significant. The first occasion is Gadamer’s dialogue with Derrida; the second is Gadamer’s interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. The latter is noteworthy insofar as it shows how Gadamer develops a hermeneutical reading of an enormously complicated book. The first is even more significant insofar as it concerns the concept of hermeneutics: to distinguish hermeneutics from a deconstructive reading, Gadamer and Derrida resort to Nietzsche as the key figure. The aim of this paper is to examine the question of truth and interpretation in Nietzsche’s and Gadamer’s respective philosophies, their differences and similarities.","PeriodicalId":45935,"journal":{"name":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.2.0251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the first glance, Nietzsche does not appear in the Gadamerian text as a crucial figure. Nonetheless, a careful reading will dissipate this first impression. Gadamer mentions Nietzsche on several occasions, and two of them are extremely significant. The first occasion is Gadamer’s dialogue with Derrida; the second is Gadamer’s interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. The latter is noteworthy insofar as it shows how Gadamer develops a hermeneutical reading of an enormously complicated book. The first is even more significant insofar as it concerns the concept of hermeneutics: to distinguish hermeneutics from a deconstructive reading, Gadamer and Derrida resort to Nietzsche as the key figure. The aim of this paper is to examine the question of truth and interpretation in Nietzsche’s and Gadamer’s respective philosophies, their differences and similarities.
尼采与伽达默尔论真理与解释
乍一看,尼采并没有出现在伽达美尔文本中,作为一个关键人物。然而,仔细阅读会消除这种第一印象。伽达默尔在几个场合提到尼采,其中两个非常重要。第一次是伽达默尔与德里达的对话;第二个是伽达默尔对查拉图斯特拉如是说的解释。后者是值得注意的,因为它显示了伽达默尔是如何对一本极其复杂的书进行解释学解读的。第一个是更重要的,因为它涉及解释学的概念:为了区分解释学和解构主义的阅读,伽达默尔和德里达求助于尼采作为关键人物。本文的目的是考察尼采和伽达默尔各自哲学中的真理和解释问题,他们的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The New Centennial Review is devoted to comparative studies of the Americas that suggest possibilities for a different future. Centennial Review is published three times a year under the editorship of Scott Michaelsen (Department of English, Michigan State University) and David E. Johnson (Department of Comparative Literature, SUNY at Buffalo). The journal recognizes that the language of the Americas is translation, and that questions of translation, dialogue, and border crossings (linguistic, cultural, national, and the like) are necessary for rethinking the foundations and limits of the Americas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信