CRT, information, and disability: An intersectional commentary

Mondrea (Mondo) Vaden
{"title":"CRT, information, and disability: An intersectional commentary","authors":"Mondrea (Mondo) Vaden","doi":"10.3233/efi-220055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grounded in my perspective as a Deaf, Black, and Trans librarian who has worked in many Library and Information Science (LIS) roles, I argue in this paper that information scientists and professionals could close the gap in representation and information access by applying a knowledge of intersectionality to our work. I make the case for this by presenting examples of three Black historical “hidden figures” who shaped life as we know it in the USA, highlighting the erased dimensions of their lives as disabled people. Despite this geographical setting, these intersectional counter stories are relevant to addressing local areas of inequity in information access and resources worldwide. This community commentary paper addresses a serious gap in scholarship and practice around the erasure of disability from both Black History and LIS theory and practice, and follows in the Critical Race Theory (CRT) traditions of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991) and counter-storytelling (Solórzano & Yosso, 2002) to bridge this gulf. Applying CRT and related concepts to LIS work prepares the ground for immediate and future needs for equitable access to resources, by acknowledging those who may be hindered by their racial/ableist/queerphobic biases and the way they may unknowingly play into systemic oppression, just by their participation. This will maintain relevance and contribute to the creation of equity for Black and brown marginalized LIS staff and community members going forward. Having additional systemic support for our most marginalized staff members would create ripple effects in information access and cultural competency in the way we are able to see barriers and opportunities, and the field as a whole would benefit.","PeriodicalId":84661,"journal":{"name":"Environmental education and information","volume":"58 1","pages":"339-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental education and information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-220055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grounded in my perspective as a Deaf, Black, and Trans librarian who has worked in many Library and Information Science (LIS) roles, I argue in this paper that information scientists and professionals could close the gap in representation and information access by applying a knowledge of intersectionality to our work. I make the case for this by presenting examples of three Black historical “hidden figures” who shaped life as we know it in the USA, highlighting the erased dimensions of their lives as disabled people. Despite this geographical setting, these intersectional counter stories are relevant to addressing local areas of inequity in information access and resources worldwide. This community commentary paper addresses a serious gap in scholarship and practice around the erasure of disability from both Black History and LIS theory and practice, and follows in the Critical Race Theory (CRT) traditions of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991) and counter-storytelling (Solórzano & Yosso, 2002) to bridge this gulf. Applying CRT and related concepts to LIS work prepares the ground for immediate and future needs for equitable access to resources, by acknowledging those who may be hindered by their racial/ableist/queerphobic biases and the way they may unknowingly play into systemic oppression, just by their participation. This will maintain relevance and contribute to the creation of equity for Black and brown marginalized LIS staff and community members going forward. Having additional systemic support for our most marginalized staff members would create ripple effects in information access and cultural competency in the way we are able to see barriers and opportunities, and the field as a whole would benefit.
CRT,信息和残疾:交叉评论
作为一个聋人、黑人和跨性别图书管理员,我曾担任过许多图书馆和信息科学(LIS)的角色,我在本文中认为,信息科学家和专业人员可以通过将交叉性知识应用到我们的工作中来缩小表征和信息获取方面的差距。为了证明这一点,我举了三个黑人历史上“隐藏人物”的例子,他们塑造了我们所知道的美国生活,突出了他们作为残疾人生活中被抹去的方面。尽管地理环境如此,但这些相互交织的反故事与解决世界各地信息获取和资源不平等的地方问题有关。这篇社区评论论文解决了关于黑人历史和美国理论与实践中消除残疾的学术和实践中的严重差距,并遵循了批判性种族理论(CRT)的交叉性传统(Crenshaw, 1991)和反叙事(Solórzano & Yosso, 2002)来弥合这一鸿沟。将CRT和相关概念应用到LIS工作中,通过承认那些可能受到种族/残疾主义/同性恋偏见阻碍的人,以及他们可能不知不觉地参与系统压迫的方式,为当前和未来公平获取资源的需求奠定了基础。这将保持相关性,并有助于为黑人和棕色人种被边缘化的LIS员工和社区成员创造平等。为我们最边缘化的工作人员提供额外的系统支持,将在我们能够看到障碍和机会的方式上,在信息获取和文化能力方面产生连锁反应,整个领域将受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信